Sex differences in mental rotation were investigated as a function of stimulus complexity with a sample size of N = 72. Replicating earlier findings with polygons, mental rotation was faster for males than for females, and reaction time increased with more complex polygons. Additionally, sex differences increased for complex polygons. Most importantly, however, mental rotation speed decreased with increasing complexity for women but did not change for men. Thus, the sex effects reflect a difference in strategy, with women mentally rotating the polygons in an analytic, piecemeal fashion and men using a holistic mode of mental rotation.
CochranK. F.WheatleyG. H. (1989). Ability and sex-related differences in cognitive strategies on spatial tasks.The Journal of General Psychology116, 43–55.
2.
CorballisM. C. (1997). Mental rotation and the right hemisphere.Brain and Language57, 100–121.
3.
ErdfelderE.FaulF.BuchnerA. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program.Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers28, 1–11.
4.
FolkM. D.LuceR. (1987). Effects of stimulus complexity on mental rotation rate of polygons.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance13, 395–404.
5.
HalpernD. F. (1992). Sex differences in cognitive abilitiesHillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6.
HeilM. (2002). The functional significance of ERP effects during mental rotation.Psychophysiology39, 535–545.
7.
HeilM.Jansen-OsmannP. (2007). Children's left parietal brain activation during mental rotation is reliable as well as specific.Cognitive Development22, 280–288.
8.
HugdahlK.ThomsenT.ErslandL. (2006). Sex differences in visuo-spatial processing: An fMRI study of mental rotation.Neuropsychologia44, 1575–1583.
9.
Jansen-OsmannP.HeilM. (2007a). Developmental aspects of the parietal laterality of ERP effects during mental rotation.NeuroReport18, 175–178.
10.
Jansen-OsmannP.HeilM. (2007b). Suitable stimuli to obtain (no) gender differences in the speed of cognitive processes involved in mental rotation.Brain and Cognition64, 217–227.
11.
JolicœurP.RegehrS.SmithL. B. J. P.SmithG. N. (1985). Mental rotation of representations of two-dimensional and three-dimensional objects.Canadian Journal of Psychology39, 100–129.
12.
JordanK.HeinzeH. J.LutzK.KanowskiM.JänckeL. (2001). Cortical activations during the mental rotation of different visual objects.NeuroImage13, 143–152.
13.
KailR.CarterP.PellegrinoJ. W. (1979). The locus of sex differences in spatial ability.Perception and Psychophysics26, 182–186.
14.
PetersM. (2005). Sex differences and the factor of time in solving Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotation problems.Brain and Cognition57, 176–184.
15.
ShepardR. N.MetzlerJ. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects.Science171, 701–703.
16.
StoffelsE. J. (1996). Inhibition of concurrent processes in letter and orientation discrimination.Acta Psychologica91, 153–173.
17.
VandenbergS. G.KuseA. R. (1978). Mental rotation, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualisation.Perceptual and Motor Skills47, 599–604.
18.
VoyerD.ButlerT.CorderoJ.BrakeB.SilbersweigD.SternE. (2006). The relation between computerized and paper-and-pencil mental rotation tasks: A validation study.Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology28, 928–939.
19.
VoyerD.VoyerS.BrydenM. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables.Psychological Bulletin117, 250–270.
20.
WiedenbauerG.SchmidJ.Jansen-OsmannP. (2007). Manual training of mental rotation.European Journal of Cognitive Psychology19, 17–36.
