BuckS., FaircloughE.H., JephcottJ. St G., & RingerD.W.C. (1977). Conditioning and bias in consumer panels – some new results.Journal of the Market Research Society, 19, 2 (also published in Journal of the Market Research Society (1977), 39, 1.
ClintonJ.D. (2001). Panel bias from attrition and conditioning: a case study of the Knowledge Networks Panel.Montreal: AAPOR Conference.
6.
CorderL.S., & HorvitzD.G. (1989). Panel effects in the National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey. In: KasprzykD., DuncanG., KaltonG., & SinghM.P. (eds) Panel Surveys.New York, NY: Wiley.
7.
DillmanD.A., SingerE., ClarkJ.R., & TreatJ.B. (1996). Effects of benefits appeals and variations in statements of confidentiality on completion rates for census questionnaires.Public Opinion Quarterly, 60, 3, Fall.
8.
DuffyB., SmithK., TerhanianG., & BremerJ. (2005). Comparing data from online and face-to-face surveys.International Journal of Market Research, 47, 6, pp. 615–639.
9.
FerberR. (1992). Observations on a consumer panel operation.Journal of Marketing, 17, 3.
10.
GabrielC. (1990). The validity of qualitative market research.International Journal of Market Research, 32, 4.
LievesleyD.A., & WatertonJ.J. (1985). Measuring individual attitude changes. In: JowellR., & WitherspoonS. (eds) British Social Attitudes – The 1985 Report.Aldershot: Gower.
13.
MillerG.A. (1956). The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information.Psychological Review, 63, pp. 81–97.
14.
O'MuircheartaighC. (1989). Sources of nonsampling error. In: KasprzykD., DuncanG., KaltonG., & SinghM.P. (eds) Panel Surveys.New York, NY: Wiley.
PennellS., & LepkowskiJ.N. (1992). Panel Conditioning Effects in the Survey of Income and Program Participation.Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
17.
RosenthalR., & FodeK.L. (1961). The problem of experimenter outcome-bias. In: RayD.P. (ed.) Series Research in Social Psychology. Symposia studies series, no. 8, Washington, DC: National Institute of Social and Behavioural Science.
18.
SchlackmanW. (1984). A discussion of the use of sensitivity panels in market research. The use of trained respondents in qualitative studies.Journal of the Market Research Society, 26, 3, pp. 191–208.
19.
SilbersteinA.R., & JacobsC.A. (1989). Symptoms of repeated interview effects on the consumer expenditure interview survey. In: KasprzykD., DuncanG., KaltonG., & SinghM.P. (eds) Panel Surveys.New York, NY: Wiley.
20.
SingerE., HipplerH.-J., & SchwarzN. (1992). Confidentiality assurances in surveys: reassurance or threat.International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 4, 34, Autumn, pp. 256–268.
21.
SingerE., Von ThurnD.R., & MillerE.R. (1995). Confidentiality assurances and response. A quantitative review of the experimental literature.Public Opinion Quarterly, 59, 1, Spring, pp. 67–77.
22.
TourangeauR., RipsL.J., and RasinskiK (2000). The Psychology of Survey Response.Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23.
WatertonJ., & LievesleyD. (1989). Evidence of conditioning effects in the British Social Attitudes Panel. In: KasprzykD., DuncanG., KaltonG., & SinghM.P. (eds) Panel Surveys.New York, NY: Wiley.