AnkersP. (2004) The changing face of marketing academia. What can we learn from commercial market research and practitioners?Market Intelligence and Planning, 38, 5/6, pp. 492–499.
2.
AnkersP., & BrennanR. (2002) Managerial relevance in academic research: an exploratory study.Market Intelligence and Planning, 2, 1, pp. 15–21.
3.
BennisW.G., & O'TooleJ. (2005) How business schools lost their way.Harvard Business Review, May, pp. 96–104.
4.
BlackburnS. (1996) Oxford Dictionary of Philosophy.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
BoddyC.R. (2001) Perceived reasons for the success of the UK market research industry.International Journal of Market Research, 43, 1, pp. 29–41.
7.
BoddyC.R. (2005a) Groups in focus: the distinctive difference between focus group discussions and focus group interviews.Australasian Journal of Market and Social Research, 13, 2, pp. 29–38.
8.
BoddyC.R. (2005b) Post-doctoral academic directions: attitudes of international business academics to research and teaching. In: National Business Student Research Conference Refereed Proceedings.Perth: Curtin University Graduate School of Business.
9.
BoddyC.R. (2005c) Projective techniques in market research: valueless subjectivity or insightful reality? A look at the evidence for the usefulness, reliability and validity of projective techniques in market research.International Journal of Market Research, 47, 3, pp. 239–254.
10.
BoddyC.R. (2005d) A rose by any other name may smell as sweet but ‘group discussion’ is not another name for a ‘focus group’ nor should it be.Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 8, 3, pp. 248–255.
11.
BoddyC.R., & BuoyL. (2005) Publish or perish! Displaying your new knowledge in new directions through academic publication: the hows, whys and wherefores of getting published. In: National Business Student Research Conference Refereed Proceedings.Perth: Curtin University Graduate School of Business.
12.
BoddyC.R., & CroftR. (2005a) Fork in the road or end of the line: can Britain continue its dominance of international market research? British Market Research Association Annual Conference, 14-15 November.
13.
BoddyC.R., & CroftR. (2005b) Wine, women and weather or just shades of empire? British dominance of international marketing research. Academy of Marketing Conference 2005, Academy of Marketing, Dublin.
14.
BrennanR. (2004) Should we worry about an ‘academic-practitioner divide’ in marketing?Market Intelligence and Planning, 22, 5, pp. 492–500.
15.
BrennanR., & AnkersP. (2004) In search of relevance.Is there an academic-practitioner divide in business to business marketing? Market Intelligence and Planning, 22, 5, pp. 511–519.
16.
BrennanR., BainesP., & GillM. (2006) Perceptions of research in marketing: perspectives from the academic and professional marketing research communities. Academy of Marketing Annual Conference 2006, Middlesex University Business School, London.
17.
BrownS. (1993) Postmodern marketing?European Journal of Marketing, 27, 4, pp. 19–34.
18.
CalabreseR.L., & RobertsB. (2004) Self-interest and scholarly publication: the dilemma of researchers, reviewers and editors.International Journal of Educational Management, 18, 6, pp. 335–341.
19.
CarsonD., & GilmoreA. (2002) Editorial: The market for academic publications.European Journal of Marketing, 36, 11/12, pp. 1194–1195.
20.
ClaphamP. (2005) Publish or perish.Bioscience, 55, 5, pp. 390–391.
21.
EdwardsS. (2005) A World View from Synovate, available at www.bmra.org.uk/mrbusiness (accessed online 10 October 2005, 8.40 pm).
22.
GrayB.J., OttesenG.G., & MatearS. (2005) Disseminating academic research information to marketing practitioners. The receiver's perspective.Market Intelligence and Planning, 23, 2, pp. 124–135.
23.
KincheloeJ.L., & McLarenP. (2000) Rethinking critical theory and qualitative research. In: DenzinN.K., & LincolnY.S. (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 279–313.
24.
KnowlesL., & HensherD.A. (2005) The postgraduate business curriculum: the frontline in the war between professionalism and academic relevance.International Journal of Management Education, 4, 3, pp. 31–39.
25.
LincolnY.S., & GubaE.G. (2000) Paradigm controversies, contradictions and emerging influences. In: DenzinN.K., & LincolnY.S. (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research.Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 163–188.
26.
PiercyN.F. (2006) The trouble with marketing research is marketing researchers, International Journal of Market Research, 48, 3, pp. 253–254.
27.
RiegerF., & Wong-RiegerD. (1996) Doing relevant research: the essential role of the research model. In: PunnettB.J., & ShenkarO. (eds) Handbook for International Management Research.Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.
28.
RookD.W. (2003) Out-of-focus groups: it's time for focus groups to return to their original goal - understanding customers.Marketing Research: A Magazine of Management and Applications, 15, 2, pp. 10–15.
29.
RosenauP.M. (1992) Post-Modernism and the Social Sciences. Insights, Inroads, and Intrusions.Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
RossG.M., & FrancksR. (1996) Descartes. In: BunninN., & Tsui-JamesE.P. (eds) The Blackwell Companion to Philosophy.Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 509–517.
31.
SchweserC. (1983) The economics of academic publishing.Journal of Economic Education, 14, 1, pp. 60–64.
32.
SmithD. (2003) Change in time before time changes you. Annual Conference of the Market Research Society.
33.
SmithD. (2005) It's not how good you are, it's how good you want to be! Are market researchers really up for ‘reconstruction’?Annual Conference of the Market Research Society.
34.
StantonA.D.A. (2006) Bridging the academic/practitioner divide in marketing. An undergraduate course in data mining.Market Intelligence and Planning, 24, 3, pp. 233–242.
35.
TarnasR. (2000) The Passion of the Western Mind.London: Pimlico.