Projective Techniques in Market Research: Valueless Subjectivity or Insightful Reality? A Look at the Evidence for the Usefulness,Reliability and Validity of Projective Techniques in Market Research
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online May, 2005
Projective Techniques in Market Research: Valueless Subjectivity or Insightful Reality? A Look at the Evidence for the Usefulness,Reliability and Validity of Projective Techniques in Market Research
BoddyC.R. (2004a) From brand image research to teaching assessment: using a projective technique borrowed from marketing research to aid an understanding of teaching effectiveness. Journal of Quality Assurance in Education, 12, 2, pp. 94–105.
4.
BoddyC.R. (2004b) Projective techniques in business research: are they useful? National Business Student Research Conference Refereed Proceedings, Curtin University Graduate School of Business, Perth.
5.
CatterallM. (1998) Academics, practitioners and qualitative market research. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 1, 2, pp. 69–76.
6.
CatterallM., & IbbotsonP. (2000) Using projective techniques in education research. British Education Research Journal, 26, 2, pp. 245–256.
ColmanA.M. (2001) A Dictionary of Psychology, Projective Tests, available at www.oxfordreference.com (23.07.2004).
9.
ColwellJ. (1990) Qualitative market research: a conceptual analysis and review of practitioner criteria. Journal of the Market Research Society, 32, 1, pp. 13–36.
EreautG. (2002) Analysis and Interpretation in Qualitative Market Research.London: Sage.
17.
FramE.H., & CibottiE. (1991) The shopping list studies and projective techniques: a 40-year view. Marketing Research, 3, 4, pp. 14–22.
18.
GlaserB.G. (1998) Doing Grounded Theory: Issues and Discussions.Mill Valley, California: Sociology Press.
19.
GlaserB.G. (2001) The Grounded Theory Perspective: Conceptualization Contrasted with Description.Mill Valley, California: Sociology Press.
20.
GlaserB.G. (2003) The Grounded Theory Perspective II: Description's Remodelling of Grounded Theory Methodology.Mill Valley, California: Sociology Press.
21.
GlaserB.G., & StraussA. (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research.Chicago: Aldine.
22.
GoodyearM. (1998) Qualitative research. In McDonaldC., & VangelderP. (eds), The ESOMAR Handbook of Market and Opinion Research (4th edn). Amsterdam: ESOMAR.
23.
GordonW., & LangmaidR. (1990) Qualitative Market Research. A Practitioner's and Buyer's Guide. Aldershot: Gower.
24.
GriggsS. (1987) Analysing qualitative data. Journal of the Market Research Society, 29, 1, pp. 15–33.
25.
HaireM. (1950) Projective techniques in marketing research. Journal of Marketing, 14, 5, pp. 649–656.
26.
HusseyM., & DuncombeN. (1999) Projecting the right image: using projective techniques to measure brand image. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 2, 1, pp. 22–30.
27.
KayD. (2001) Going beyond words: how researchers are using projective techniques to better understand people's view of brands. Marketing Magazine, 106, p. 22.
28.
KennedyM.M. (1997) So how'm I doing?Across the Board, 34, 6, pp. 53–54.
29.
LevyS.J. (1985) Dreams, fairy tales, animals and cars. Psychology and Marketing, 2, 2, pp. 67–81.
30.
LevyS.J. (1994) Interpreting consumer mythology: structural approach to consumer behavior focuses on story telling. Marketing Management, 2, 4, pp. 49.
31.
LilienfeldS.O., WoodJ.M., & GarbH.N. (2000) The scientific status of projective techniques. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 1, 2, pp. 27–66.
32.
LysakerR.L., & BradleyJ.E. (1957) What is a pictorial projective technique. Journal of Marketing, 21, pp. 339–340.
33.
MillerC. (1991) Respondents project, let psyches go crazy. Marketing News, 25, pp. 13.
34.
MollerP., & AlstedC. (1996) Understanding consumer reactions to cinema advertising in Denmark. Marketing and Research Today, 24, 2, pp. 107–115.
35.
NancarrowC., BarkerA., & WrightL.T. (2001) Engaging the right mindset in qualitative marketing research. Marketing Planning and Intelligence, 19, 4, pp. 236–244.
36.
RichmanJ. (1996) Jokes as a projective technique: the humor of psychiatric patients. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 50, 3, pp. 336–346.
37.
RobsonS. (2000) Group discussions. In BirnR.J. (ed.), The Handbook of International Market Research Techniques.London: Kogan Page, pp. 297–316.
38.
SykesW. (1990) Validity and reliability in qualitative market research: a review of the literature. Journal of the Market Research Society, 32, 3, pp. 289–323.