Indigenous cultural nuances such as age-related hierarchies in South Korea have the potential to impact workers’ engagement in innovation-related behaviors (IRBs). We use self-categorization theory to examine both the relationship between employee age and IRBs and the cross-level interaction effects of team psychological safety climate. Using a multilevel sample of 282 South Korean employees working in 65 teams across 45 different organizations in various industries, we find that team psychological safety climate moderates the relationship between age and engaging in IRBs. More specifically, we find that when teams have a weaker psychological safety climate, age is positively related to engaging in IRBs. However, when teams have a stronger psychological safety climate, age is not related to engaging in IRBs. We discuss the implications of these findings for innovation and managing work teams in Eastern contexts.
AguinisHGottfredsonRKCulpepperSA (2013) Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. Journal of Management39: 1490–528.
2.
AmabileTM (1988) A Model of Creativity and Innovation in Organizations. In: StawBMCummingsLL (eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 10. Greenwich: JAI Press, pp. 123–67.
3.
AmabileTMContiRCoonH, et al. (1996) Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal39: 1154–84.
4.
AndersonNDe DreuCKWNijstadBA (2004) The routinization of innovation research: a constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior25: 147–73.
5.
AndersonNPotočnikKZhouJ (2014) Innovation and creativity in organizations: a state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management40: 1297–333.
6.
BaerMFreseM (2003) Innovation is not enough: climates for initiative and psychological safety, process innovations, and firm performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior24: 45–68.
7.
BaumannCHaminHTungRL, et al. (2016) Competitiveness and workforce performance: Asia vis-à-vis the “West.” International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management28: 2197–217.
8.
BrislinRW (1986) The Wording and Translation of Research Instruments. In: LonnerWJBerryJW (eds), Field Methods in Cross-Cultural Research. Beverly Hills: SAGE, pp. 137–64.
9.
BurkeCSStaglKCSalasE, et al. (2006) Understanding team adaptation: a conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology91: 1189–207.
10.
BurrisERDetertJRChiaburuDS (2008) Quitting before leaving: the mediating effects of psychological attachment and detachment on voice. Journal of Applied Psychology93: 912–22.
11.
CarrascoI (2014) Gender gap in innovation: an institutionalist explanation. Management Decision52: 410–24.
12.
ChenASYHouYH (2016) The effects of ethical leadership, voice behavior and climates for innovation on creativity: a moderated mediation examination. The Leadership Quarterly27: 1–13.
13.
ChenYTjosvoldDPanY (2010) Collectivist team values for Korean-Chinese co-worker relationships and job performance. International Journal of Intercultural Relations34: 475–81.
14.
CollinsCJSmithKG (2006) Knowledge exchange and combination: the role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal49: 544–60.
15.
DedahanovATLeeDHRheeJ, et al. (2016) Entrepreneur’s paternalistic leadership style and creativity: the mediating role of employee voice. Management Decision54: 2310–324.
DelizonnaL (2017) High-performing teams need psychological safety: here’s how to create it. Harvard Business Review8: 1–5.
18.
DowlingPJDonnellyN (2013) Managing people in global markets—the Asia Pacific perspective. Journal of World Business48: 171–74.
19.
EdmondsonA (1999) Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly44: 350–83.
20.
EdmondsonACLeiZ (2014) Psychological safety: the history, renaissance, and future of an interpersonal construct. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior1: 23–43.
21.
FarhJLTsuiASXinK, et al. (1998) The influence of relational demography and guanxi: the Chinese case. Organization Science9: 471–88.
22.
FrostPJEgriCP (1991) The Political Process of Innovation. In: StawBMCummingsLL (eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 13. Greenwich: JAI Press, pp. 229–95.
23.
GongYKimTYLeeDR, et al. (2013) A multilevel model of team goal orientation, information exchange, and creativity. Academy of Management Journal56: 827–51.
24.
HangL (2011) Traditional Confucianism and its contemporary relevance. Asian Philosophy21: 437–45.
25.
HarrisonDAKleinKJ (2007) What’s the difference? Diversity constructs as separation, variety, or disparity in organizations. Academy of Management Review32: 1199–228.
26.
HerbigPJacobsL (1998) Culture as an explanatory variable for the Japanese innovative processes. Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal5: 5–30.
27.
HoggMATerryDI (2000) Social identity and self-categorization processes in organizational contexts. Academy of Management Review25: 121–40.
28.
HorakSYangI (2019) Whither seniority? Career progression and performance orientation in South Korea. The International Journal of Human Resource Management30: 1419–447.
29.
HülshegerURAndersonNSalgadoJF (2009) Team-level predictors of innovation at work: a comprehensive meta-analysis spanning three decades of research. Journal of Applied Psychology94: 1128–45.
30.
HuyerSHakinN (2012) National Assessments on Gender Equality in the Knowledge Society: Gender in Science, Technology and Innovation. Organization for Women in Science for the Developing World. Toronto: Ontario Women in Global Science and Technology.
31.
JanssenO (2000) Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology73: 287–302.
32.
JanssenO (2003) Innovative behavior and job involvement at the price of conflict and less satisfactory relations with co-workers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology76: 347–64.
33.
JanssenO (2005) The joint impact of perceived influence and supervisor supportiveness on employee innovative behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology78: 573–79.
34.
JoshiA (2014) By whom and when is women’s expertise recognized? The interactive effects of gender and education in science and engineering teams. Administrative Science Quarterly59: 202–39.
35.
KangHRYangHDRowleyC (2006) Factors in team effectiveness: cognitive and demographic similarities of software development team members. Human Relations59: 1681–710.
36.
KanterRM (1983) The Change Masters: Innovation and Productivity in American Corporations. New York: Simon & Schuster.
37.
KanterRM (1988) When a thousand flowers bloom: structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organization. In: StawBMCummingsLL (eds), Research in Organizational Behavior, vol. 10. Greenwich: JAI Press, pp. 169–211.
38.
KimKH (2009) Cultural influence on creativity: the relationship between Asian culture (Confucianism) and creativity among Korean educators. The Journal of Creative Behavior43: 73–93.
39.
KimYMoonY (2011) National Assessment on Gender and Science, Technology and Innovation: Republic of Korea. Women in Global Science & Technology. Seoul: Korea Women’s Development Institute.
40.
KimAEParkGS (2003) Nationalism, Confucianism, work ethic and industrialization in South Korea. Journal of Contemporary Asia33: 37–49.
41.
LeeSYPitesaMThauS, et al. (2015) Discrimination in selection decisions: integrating stereotype fit and interdependence theories. Academy of Management Journal58: 789–812.
42.
LevineJMChoiHSMorelandRL (2003) Newcomer Innovation in Work Teams. In: PaulusPNijstadB (eds), Group Creativity: Innovation Through Collaboration. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 202–24.
43.
MaLCSmithK (1992) Social correlates of Confucian ethics in Taiwan. The Journal of Social Psychology132: 655–59.
44.
MurrayFGrahamL (2007) Buying science and selling science: gender differences in the market for commercial science. Industrial and Corporate Change16: 657–89.
45.
NählinderJ (2010) Where are all the female innovators? Nurses as innovators in a public sector innovation project. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation5: 13–29.
NgTWHFeldmanDC (2013) A meta-analysis of the relationships of age and tenure with innovation-related behavior. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology86: 585–616.
48.
NienaberA-MHoltorfVLekerJ, et al. (2015) A climate of psychological safety enhances the success of front end teams. International Journal of Innovation Management19: 1–34.
49.
ParkHRehgMTLeeD (2005) The influence of Confucian ethics and collectivism on whistleblowing intentions: a study of South Korean public employees. Journal of Business Ethics58: 387–403.
50.
PfefferJ (1985) Organizational demography: implications for management. California Management Review28: 67–81.
51.
PreacherKJCurranPJBauerDJ (2006) Computational tools for probing interaction effects in multiple linear regression, multilevel modeling, and latent curve analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics31: 437–48.
52.
RaginsBR (2007) Diversity and Workplace Mentoring Relationships: A Review and Positive Social Capital Approach. In: AllenTAEbyLT (eds), The Blackwell Handbook of Mentoring: A Multiple Perspectives Approach. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 281–300.
53.
RaudenbushSWBrykAS (2002) Hierarchical Linear Models: Applications and Data Analysis Methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
54.
RietzschelEFZacherHStroebeW (2016) A lifespan perspective on creativity and innovation at work. Work, Aging and Retirement2: 105–20.
55.
RikettaMVan DickR (2005) Foci of attachment in organizations: a meta-analytic comparison of the strength and correlates of workgroup versus organizational identification and commitment. Journal of Vocational Behavior67: 490–510.
56.
SaekiNFanXVan BusenL (2001) A comparative study of creative thinking of American and Japanese college students. The Journal of Creative Behavior35: 24–36.
57.
ShinSJKimTYLeeJY, et al. (2012) Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: a cross-level interaction. Academy of Management Journal55: 197–212.
58.
ŚleziakT (2013) The role of Confucianism in contemporary South Korean society. Rocznik Orientalistyczny/Yearbook of Oriental Studies66: 27–46.
59.
SpearsR (2011) Group Identities: The Social Identity Perspective. In: SchwartzSJLuyckxKVignolesVL (eds), Handbook of Identity Theory and Research. New York: Springer, pp. 201–24.
60.
SteffensNKShemlaMWeggeJ, et al. (2014) Organizational tenure and employee performance: a multilevel analysis. Group & Organization Management39: 664–90.
61.
SungKKimHS (2009) Elder Respect Among Young Adults: Exploration of Behavioral Forms in Korea. In: SunKKimJK (eds), Respect for the Elderly—Implications for Human Service Providers. Lanham: University Press of America, pp. 225–40.
62.
TajfelH (1978) Differentiation Between Social Groups: Studies in the Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. London: Academic Press.
63.
TajfelHTurnerJC (1986) The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior. In: WorchelSAustinWG (eds), Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Chicago: Nelson-Hall, pp. 7–24.
64.
TsuiASEganTDO’ReillyIII CA (1992) Being different: relational demography and organizational attachment. Administrative Science Quarterly37: 549–79.
65.
TurnerJC (1987) Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-categorization Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
66.
TurnerJCReynoldsKJ (2012) Self-Categorization Theory. In: Van LangePAMKruglanskiAWHigginsET (eds), Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology. London: SAGE, pp. 1–23.
67.
Van DickR (2001) Identification in organizational contexts: linking theory and research from social and organizational psychology. International Journal of Management Reviews3: 265–83.
68.
ViengkhamDBaumannCWinzarH (2018) Confucianism: measurement and association with workforce performance. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management25: 337–74.
69.
WalumbwaFOSchaubroeckJ (2009) Leader personality traits and employee voice behavior: mediating roles of ethical leadership and work group psychological safety. Journal of Applied Psychology94: 1275–86.
70.
WangJLeungKZhouF (2014) A dispositional approach to psychological climate: relationships between interpersonal harmony motives and psychological climate for communication safety. Human Relations67: 489–515.
71.
WangPRodeJCShiK, et al. (2013) A workgroup climate perspective on the relationships among transformational leadership, workgroup diversity, and employee creativity. Group & Organization Management38: 334–60.
72.
WeeH (2013, July12) Korean culture may offer clues in Asiana crash. CNBC. URL:http://www.cnbc.com/id/100869966 (accessed May 2017).
73.
WilliamsKDSommerKL (1997) Social ostracism by coworkers: Does rejection lead to loafing or compensation?Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin23: 693–706.
74.
WoodmanRWSawyerJEGriffinRW (1993) Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review18: 293–321.
75.
YuanFWoodmanRW (2010) Innovative behavior in the workplace: the role of performance and image outcome expectations. Academy of Management Journal53: 323–42.
76.
ZhouJShalleyCE (2003) Research on Employee Creativity: A Critical Review and Directions for Future Research. In: MartocchioJ (ed), Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, vol. 22. Oxford: Elsevier, pp. 165–217.
77.
ZhouJSuY (2010) A missing piece of the puzzle: the organizational context in cultural patterns of creativity. Management and Organization Review6: 391–413.
