We report on the first experimental tests of the integration of status characteristics theory and self-categorization theory. Using 3-person and 6-person group interaction studies, we find mixed support. While members who have higher status in the group, or who have traits prototypical of the group, do impart greater influence over group decision-making, for members who have both high status and prototypical characteristics, the benefits are not additive. Group members are also no more likely to direct behaviors to a fellow group member who displays prototypical traits, than either non-prothotypical fellow group members or individuals in an outgroup.
BalkwellJ. W. (1991a). From expectations to behavior: An improved postulate for expectation states theory. American Sociological Review, 56, 355–369. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096109
2.
BalkwellJ. W. (1991b). Status characteristics and social interaction: Assessment of theoretical variants. In LawlerE. J.MarkovskyB.RidgewayC.WalkerH. A. (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 8, pp. 135–176). JAI Press.
3.
BalkwellJ. W. (1995). Strong tests of expectation-states hypotheses. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(1), 44–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787142
4.
BarnumC.MarkovskyB. N. (2007). Group membership and social influence. Current Research in Social Psychology, 13(3), 22–38.
5.
BarnumC.McLeerJ.MarkovskyB. (2016). Status characteristics and self-categorization: A bridge across theoretical traditions. Current Research in Social Psychology, 24(5), 49–58.
6.
BergerJ.CohenB. P.ZelditchM.Jr. (1972). Status characteristics and social interaction. American Sociological Review, 37, 241–255. https://doi.org/10.2307/3033902
BergerJ.FişekM. H. (2006). Diffuse status characteristics and the spread of status value: A formal theory. American Journal of Sociology, 111(4), 1038–1079. https://doi.org/10.1086/498633
9.
BergerJ.FişekM. H.NormanR. Z.ZelditchM.Jr. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation states approach. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/56.2.742
10.
BergerJ.NormanR. Z.BalkwellJ.SmithR. F. (1992). Status inconsistency in task situations: A test of four status processing principles. American Sociological Review, 57(6), 843–855. https://doi.org/10.2307/2096127
11.
BergerJ.WagnerD. G.WebsterM. (2014). Expectation states theory: Growth, opportunities, and challenges. In ThyeS.LawlerE. (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 31, pp. 19–55). Emerald Group Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0882-614520140000031000
12.
BergerJ.WebsterM.Jr. (2006). Expectations, status, and behavior. In BurkeP. J. (Ed.), Contemporary social psychological theories (pp. 268–300). Stanford University Press.
CohenE. G.LotanR. A. (1995). Producing equal-status interaction in the heterogeneous classroom. American Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.2307/1163215
15.
CorrellS. J.RidgewayC. L. (2003). Expectation states theory. In DelamaterJ. (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 29–51). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers.
16.
DavidB. (2001). Majority and minority influence: A single-process self-categorization model. In De DreuC. K. W.De VriesN. K. (Eds.), Group consensus and minority influence: Implications for innovation (pp. 91–121). Blackwell Publishing.
17.
DavidB.TurnerJ. C. (1996). Studies in self-categorization and minority conversion: Is being a member of the outgroup an advantage?British Journal of Social Psychology, 35(1), 179–199. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1996.tb01091.x
18.
DeVellisR. F. (2011). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage.
19.
FişekM. H. (1974). A model for the evolution of status structures in task-oriented discussion groups. In BergerJ.ConnerT. L.FişekM. H. (Eds.), Expectation states theory: A theoretical research program (pp. 53–83). Winthrop Publishers.
20.
FişekM. H.BarlasZ. (2013). Permutation tests for goodness-of-fit testing of mathematical models to experimental data. Social Science Research, 42(2), 482–495. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2012.09.010
21.
FişekM. H.BergerJ.NormanR. Z. (1991). Participation in heterogeneous groups: A theoretical integration. American Journal of Sociology, 97(1), 114–142. https://doi.org/10.1086/229742
22.
FişekM. H.NormanR. Z.Nelson-KilgerM. (1992). Status characteristics and expectation states theory: A priori model parameters and test. Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 16(4), 285–303. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1992.9990092
GoodmanL. A. (1968). The analysis of cross-classified data: Independence, quasi-independence, and interactions in contingency tables with or without missing entries. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 63(324), 1091–1131. https://doi.org/10.2307/2285873
25.
HoggM. A.MullinB. A. (1999). Joining groups to reduce uncertainty: Subjective uncertainty reduction and group identification. In AbramsD.HoggM. A. (Eds.), Social identity and social cognition (pp. 249–279). Blackwell Publishing.
26.
KalkhoffW. (2007). An Authorware program for manipulating levels of three specific status characteristics in two-person, three-person, and four-person discussion groups [Unpublished software manual].
LovagliaM.LucasJ. W.HouserJ. A.ThyeS.MarkovskyB. (1998). Status processes and mental ability test scores. American Journal of Sociology, 104(1), 195–228. https://doi.org/10.1086/210006
McLeerJ.FrederickJ.MarkovskyB.BarnumC. (2011). Standardizing open interaction coding for status processes. In ThyeS. R.LawlerE. J. (Eds.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 28, pp. 33–58). Emerald Group. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0882-6145(2011)0000028005
31.
MelamedD.OkuwobiO.BarryL. (2024). How do nominal characteristics lose status value? Asymmetry in status deconstruction. Social Psychology Quarterly, 87(1), 44–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/01902725231162351
32.
MooreJ. C.Jr. (1968). Status and influence in small group interactions. Sociometry, 31, 47–63. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786479
NesdaleD.GriffithsJ.DurkinK.MaassA. (2007). Effects of group membership, intergroup competition, and out-group ethnicity on children’s ratings of ingroup and outgroup similarity and positivity. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 25, 359–373.
35.
NesdaleD.PelyheH. (2009). Effects of experimentally induced peer-group rejection and outgroup ethnicity on children’s anxiety, self-esteem, and ingroup and outgroup attitudes. European Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6(3), 294–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405620601112436
36.
OldmeadowJ. A.PlatowM. J.FoddyM.AndersonD. (2003). Self-categorization, status, and social influence. Social Psychology Quarterly, 66(2), 138–152. https://doi.org/10.2307/1519844
37.
RidgewayC. (1982). Status in groups: The importance of motivation. American Sociological Review, 47, 76–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095043
38.
RidgewayC. (1991). The social construction of status value: Gender and other nominal characteristics. Social Forces, 70(2), 367–386. https://doi.org/10.2307/2580244
39.
RobinsonD.BalkwellJ. W. (1995). Density, transitivity, and diffuse status in task-oriented groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 58(4), 241–254. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787126
40.
ShellyR. K.TroyerL. (2001a). Emergence and completion of structure in initially undefined and partially defined groups. Social Psychology Quarterly, 64(4), 318–332. https://doi.org/10.2307/3090157
41.
ShellyR. K.TroyerL. (2001b). Speech duration and dependencies in initially structured and unstructured task groups. Sociological Perspectives, 44(4), 419–444. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2001.44.4.419
42.
ShellyR. K.WebsterM.Jr. (1997). How formal status, liking, and ability status structure interaction: Three theoretical principles and a test. Sociological Perspectives, 40(1), 81–107. https://doi.org/10.2307/1389494
43.
Smith-LovinL.SkvoretzJ. V.HudsonC. G. (1986). Status and participation in six-person groups: A test of Skvoretz’s comparative status model. Social Forces, 64(4), 992–1005. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/64.4.992
44.
SkvoretzJ.FararoT. J. (1996). Status and participation in task groups: A dynamic network model. American Journal of Sociology, 101, 1366–1414. https://doi.org/10.1086/230826
45.
TajfelH.TurnerJ. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In AustinW. G.WorchelS. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–37). Brooks/Cole Publishing.
46.
ThyeS. R. (2000). A status value theory of power in exchange relations. American Sociological Review, 65(3), 407–432. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657464
47.
TukeyJ. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Pearson Publishing.
48.
TurnerJ. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self-concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. In LawlerE. J. (Ed.), Advances in group processes (Vol. 2, pp. 243–272). JAI Press.
49.
TurnerJ. C. (1991). Social influence. Open University Press.
50.
TurnerJ. C.HoggM. A.OakesP. J.ReicherS. D.WetherellM. S. (1987). Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theory. Blackwell Publishing.
51.
WagnerD. G.BergerJ. (2007). Expectation states theory. In RitzerG. (Ed.), The Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology (pp. 1524–1528). Blackwell Publishing.
52.
WagnerD. G.FordR. S.FordT. W. (1986). Can gender inequalities be reduced?American Sociological Review, 47–61. https://doi.org/10.2307/2095477
53.
WebsterM.DriskellJ. E. (1983). Beauty as Status. American Journal of Sociology, 89(1), 140–165. https://doi.org/10.1086/227836
54.
WebsterM.Jr.RashotteL. S. (2010). Behavior, expectations and status. Social Forces, 88(3), 1021–1049. https://doi.org/10.1353/sof.0.0308
55.
WhiteH. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–838. https://doi.org/10.2307/1912934
