‘All your image are belong to us’: heritagization,archiving and historicization of memes

Abstract

From the ‘Dancing baby’, ‘All your base are belong to us’ and the ‘Hampster dance’ in the second half of the 1990s to Bernie’s mittens at the US presidential inauguration, through to ‘Disaster girl’ and ‘Distracted boyfriend’, among others, memes have become an important part of our (visual) digital culture over the last 20 years. This article demonstrates why memes should be considered a critical part of our born-digital heritage, by examining their connections to digital histories and trajectories, as well as their role in pop, visual and digital culture. The authors then map the diversity of stakeholders who contribute to this heritagization and the many challenges involved in meme preservation and archiving, including curation, agency, meaning and value.

Keywords

digital culture heritage Know Your Meme memes platforms pop culture visual culture web archives

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ayala

(2020) Internet memes, digital cultural heritage of humanity? me-dium.com. Available at: https://medium.com/swlh/internet-memes-digital-cultural-heritage-of-humanity-82c053a0ee40 (accessed 12 Feb-ruary 2024).

Barker

(2011) Aesthetics of the error: Media art, the machine, the unforeseen, and the errant. In Nunes

(ed.) Error: Glitch, Noise, and Jam in New Media Cultures. New York, NY: Continuum, 42–58.

Brunton

(2013) Spam: A Shadow History of the Internet. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

Cannizzaro

(2016) Internet memes as Internet signs: A semiotic view of digital culture. Sign Systems Studies 44(4): 562–586.

Chan

(2021) Pepe the Frog is love and peace: His second life in Hong Kong. In: Arkenbout

, et al. (eds) Critical Meme Reader: Global Mutations of the Viral Image. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures, 289–306.

Chayka

(2014) The Great Web 1.0 Revival. Available at: gizmodo.com http://gizmodo.com/the-great-web-1-0-revival-1651487835 (accessed 12 February 2024).

Clavert

Schafer

(2023) Between marginal and mainstream: Communities and ecosystems at stake. Internet Histories 7(1): 1–5.

Davison

(2012) The language of internet memes. In: Mandiberg

(ed.) The Social Media Reader. New York, NY: New York University Press, 120–134.

Davison

(2014) Because of the pixels: On the history, form, and influence of MS Paint. Journal of Visual Culture 13(3): 275–297. DOI: 10.1177/1470412914544539.

10.

D’Armenio

(2021) Archives numériques et langages audiovisuels. Signata 12. Available at: http://journals.openedition.org/signata/3025 (accesssed 12 February 2024).

11.

Dawkins

(1976) The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

12.

Denisova

(2016) Political memes as tools of dissent and alternative digital activism in the Russian-language Twitter. PhD thesis, Westminster University.

13.

Douglas

(2014) It’s supposed to look like shit: The internet ugly aesthetic. Journal of Visual Culture 13(3): 314–339. DOI: 10.1177/1470412914544516.

14.

Galip

(2021) The ‘grotesque’ in instagram memes. In: Arkenbout

, et al. (eds) Critical Meme Reader: Global Mutations of the Viral Image. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures, 27–39.

15.

Garber

(2012) The Tao of Shutterstock: What makes a stock photo a stock photo? The Atlantic. Available at: https://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2012/05/the-tao-of-shutterstock-what-makes-a-stock-photo-a-stock-photo/257280/ (accessed 12 February 2024).

16.

Godwin

(1994) Meme, counter-meme. Wired October 1st, https://www.wired.com/1994/10/godwin-if-2/

17.

Goldberg

(2011) All Your Base Are Belong to Us: How Fifty Years of Videogames Conquered Pop Culture. New York, NY: Three River Press.

18.

Harel

(2022) Archives in the making: Documenting the January 6 capitol riot on Reddit. Internet Histories 6(4): 391–411.

19.

Herring

(2013) Discourse in web 2.0: Familiar, reconfigured, and emergent. In: Tannen

Trester

A-M

(eds) Discourse 2.0. Language and New Media. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press, 1–26.

20.

Jenkins

(2009) If it doesn’t spread, it’s dead (Part one): Media viruses and memes. Available at: http://henryjenkins.org/blog/2009/02/if_it_doesnt_spread_its_dead_p.html (accessed 12 February 2024).

21.

John

(2017) The Age of Sharing. Malden, MA: Polity.

22.

Kearney

(2019) Meme frameworks: A semiotic perspective on Internet memes. Video Journal of Education and Pedagogy 4(2): 82–89.

23.

Kuppermann

(2021) Praise Gopod: Weird tales and memetic lore on the WELL. In Arkenbout

, et al. (eds) Critical Meme Reader: Global Mutations of the Viral Image. Amsterdam: Institute of Network Cultures, 49–57.

24.

Lialina

(2005) A vernacular web. The Indigenous and the barbarian. art.teleportacia.org Available at: http://art.teleportacia.org/observation/vernacular/

25.

Marino

(2022) Semiotics of virality. Signata 13. Available at: http://journals.openedition.org/signata/3936 (accessed 12 February 2024).

26.

Milner

(2018) The World Made Meme: Public Conversations and Participatory Media. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

27.

Nakamura

(2014) ‘I WILL DO EVERYthing That Am Asked’: Scambaiting, digital show-space, and the racial violence of social media. Journal of Visual Culture 13(3): 257–274.

28.

Nooney

Portwood-Stacer

(2014) One does not simply: An introduction to the Special Issue on Internet Memes. Journal of Visual Culture 13(3): 248–252.

29.

Ogden

(2022) ‘Everything on the internet can be saved’: Archive Team, Tumblr and the cultural significance of web archiving. Internet Histories 6(1/2): 113–132. DOI: 10.1080/24701475.2021.1985835.

30.

Pailler

Schafer

(2024) Keep calm and stay focused: Historicising and intertwining scales and temporalities of online virality. In: Armaselu

Fickers

(eds) Zoomland: Exploring Scale in Digital History and Humanities. Berlin: De Gruyter, 119–149.

31.

Pettis

(2022) Know Your Meme and the homogenization of web history. Internet Histories 6(3): 263–279. DOI:10.1080/24701475.2021.1968657.

32.

Phillips

(2015) This Is Why We Can’t Have Nice Things: Mapping the Relationship Between Online Trolling and Mainstream Culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

33.

Raftery

(2010) King of Cheez: The internet’s meme maestro turns junk into gold. Wired.

34.

Rees

(2021) Collecting online memetic cultures: How to. Museum & Society 19(2): 199–219.

35.

Rheingold

(2000) The Virtual Community. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

36.

Rich

(2021) Do the memes help the movies? The New York Times Magazine. Available at: https://www.nytimes.com/2021/10/13/magazine/movie-memes.html (accessed 12 February 2024).

37.

Schafer

Winters

(2021) The values of web archives. International Journal of Digital Humanities 2: 129–144. DOI: 10.1007/s42803-021-00037-0.

38.

Shifman

(2014a) Memes in Digital Culture. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

39.

Shifman

(2014b) The cultural logic of photo-based meme genres. Journal of Visual Culture 13(3): 340–358. DOI: 10.1177/1470412914546577.

40.

Treleani

(2017) Qu’est-ce que le patrimoine numérique? Une sémiologie de la circulation des archives. Lormont, France: Le Bord de l’Eau.

41.

Wagener

(2021) The postdigital emergence of memes and gifs: Meaning, discourse, and hypernarrative creativity. Postdigital Science and Education 3(1): 831–850.

42.

Wagener

(2022) Mèmologie. Théorie postdigitale des mèmes (Memology. A postdigital theory of memes). Grenoble: UGA Éditions.

43.

Wagener

(2024, forthcoming) Memes, emotional engagement, and politics. In: Schafer

Pailler

(eds) Online Virality, Spread and Influence. Berlin: De Gruyter.

44.

White

(2020) A Unified Theory of Cats on the Internet. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

45.

Wiggins

(2019) The Discursive Power of Memes in Digital Culture: Ideology, Semiotics, and Intertextuality. London: Routledge.

46.

Zink

(2019) Affective communities. In: Slaby

Von Scheve

(eds) Affective Societies: Key Concepts. London: Routledge, 289–299.