The general thrust of this study is exploratory. With an interest in the development of competence, and, the achievement of professionally purposeful action — as this is done by way of digital technologies — the study exploits the details of a single collaborative design/learning activity among students of architecture. The provided analysis aims at informing the discussion on the role of technically mediated visual reasoning for the emerging professional vision of the to-be architects. By demonstrating the performance of visually complex actions and events — events and actions that could not have occurred outside the particular medium used — the study raises some principled issues. The first issue pertains to the problem of separating the analytical work made by the students from the tools and other resources that enable this work. The second issue concerns how the use of the technology generates new ways of seeing, showing and doing architecture.
Cross, N. ( 2001). Designerly ways of knowing: Design disciplines versus design science. Design Issues, 17(3), 49-55.
2.
Eisner, W. ( 1992). Comics and sequential art. Princetown , WI: Kitchen Sink Press.
3.
Garfinkel, H. ( 1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
4.
Garfinkel, H. ( 2002). Ethnomethodology’s program: working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
5.
Garfinkel, H. ( 2007). Lebenswelt origins of the sciences: working out Durkheim’s aphorism. Human Studies, 30(1), 9-56.
6.
Garfinkel, H., & Liberman, K. ( 2007). Introduction: the lebenswelt origins of the sciences . Human Studies, 30(1), 3-7.
7.
Garfinkel, H., & Sacks, H. ( 1970). On formal structures of practical action. In J. C. McKinney & E. A. Tiryakian (Eds.), Theoretical sociology: Perspectives and developments. New York: Appleton-Century Crofts.
8.
Goodwin, C. ( 1994). Professional Vision. American Anthropologist , 96(3), 606-633.
9.
Greiffenhagen, C., & Watson, R. ( 2009). Visual repairables: Analysing the work of repair in human-computer interaction. Visual Communication, 8(1), 65-90.
10.
Image work (2003). Visual Studies , 18(1), 3-5.
11.
Ivarsson, J. ( 2004). Renderings & reasoning: studying artifacts in human knowing. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.
12.
Ivarsson, J. ( 2007, 18-19 May). Getting at design knowledge. The art of sequential analysis. Paper presented at the Thirteenth Annual Conference on Language, Interaction, and Social Organization , The University of California, Santa Barbara
13.
Lawson, B. ( 2004). What designers know. Oxford : Elsevier.
14.
Lawson, B. ( 2006). How designers think. London : Architectural Press.
15.
Lindwall, O., & Ivarsson, J. (in press). Differences that make a difference: contrasting the local enactment of two technologies in a kinematics lab. In S. Ludvigsen, A. Lund, I. Rasmussen & R. Säljö (Eds.), Learning across sites; new tools, infrastructures and practices. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
16.
Livingston, E. ( 1987). Making sense of ethnomethodology. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
17.
Lynch, M. ( 1985). Discipline and the material form of images: An analysis of scientific visibility. Social studies of science , 15, 37-66.
18.
McCloud, S. ( 1994). Understanding Comics. The invisible art. New York: HarperPerennial.
19.
Mondada, L. ( 2003). Working with video: how surgeons produce video records of their actions. Visual Studies, 18(1), 58-73.
20.
Nemirovsky, R., Cornelia, T., & Wright, T. ( 1998). Body motion and graphing. Cognition and Instruction, 16(2), 119-172.
21.
Nishizaka, A. ( 2000). Seeing what one sees: perception, emotion, and activity . Mind, Culture, and Activity, 7(1/2), 105-123.
22.
Psathas, G. ( 1995). Conversation analysis. The study of talk-in-interaction . Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications .
Sacks, H. ( 1984). Notes on methodology. In J. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action. Studies in conversation analysis (pp. 21-27). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, MA.
25.
Sacks, H., Schegloff, E.A., & Jefferson, G. ( 1974). A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking for conversation. Language, 50(4), 696-735.
26.
Schegloff, E.A. ( 2007). Sequence organization in interaction. A primer in conversation analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27.
Schön, D.A. ( 1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. New York, NY: Basic Books .
28.
Simon, H.A. ( 1969). The sciences of the artificial. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29.
SketchUp (2007). History Retrieved October 8 2007, from http://www.sketchup.com
30.
Wakita, O.A., & Linde, R.M. ( 1994). Study guide for the professional practice of architectural working drawings. John Wiley & Sons: New York.
31.
Wakita, O.A., & Linde, R.M. ( 2003). The professional practice of architectural working drawings . New York: John Wiley & Sons .
32.
Wartofsky, M.W. ( 1979). Models. Representation and the scientific understanding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.
33.
Yaneva, A. ( 2005). Scaling up and down. Extraction trials in architectural design. Social Studies of Science, 35(6), 867-894.
