Studies have demonstrated that utilizing spacing (spreading out study sessions at regular intervals) and self-testing strategies are optimal for learning. While some applied work has examined the relationship between these strategies on general academic achievement, there is still a need to explore how both spacing and self-testing are related to course-level learning outcomes. The goal of this study was to examine whether utilizing spacing and self-testing strategies was related to final course grade. Participants were asked to report the study strategies they utilized during the course. We found no relationship between using spacing strategies and final course grade. However, self-testing was significantly related to higher final course grades. The relationship between self-testing and final course grade remained significant even after accounting for demographic differences and prior academic achievement. Our results suggest that self-testing strategies can enhance learning even in a highly structured course.
BahrickHPHallLK (2005) The importance of retrieval failures to long-term retention: A metacognitive explanation of the spacing effect. Journal of Memory and Language52(4): 566–77.
2.
BenjaminASTullisJ (2010) What makes distributed practice effective?Cognitive Psychology61(3): 228–47.
3.
BiggsJB (1988a) Assessing student approaches to learning. Australian Psychologist23(2): 197–206.
4.
BiggsJB (1988b) The role of metacognition in enhancing learning. Australian Journal of Education32(2): 127–38.
5.
BjorkRA (1979) Information-processing analysis of college teaching. Educational Psychologist14(1): 15–23.
6.
CarpenterSK (2009) Cue strength as a moderator of the testing effect: The benefits of elaborative retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition35(6): 1563–9.
7.
CepedaNJPashlerHVulE, et al. (2006) Distributed practice in verbal recall tasks: A review and quantitative synthesis. Psychological Bulletin132(3): 354–80.
8.
CherneyID (2008) The effects of active learning on students’ memories for course content. Active Learning in Higher Education9(2): 152–71.
9.
DisethÅMartinsenØ (2003) Approaches to learning, cognitive style, and motives as predictors of academic achievement. Educational Psychology23(2): 195–207.
10.
DunloskyJRawsonKAMarshEJ, et al. (2013) Improving students’ learning with effective learning techniques: Promising directions from cognitive and educational psychology. Psychological Science in the Public Interest14(1): 4–58.
11.
HartwigMKDunloskyJ (2012) Study strategies of college students: Are self-testing and scheduling related to achievement?Psychonomic Bulletin & Review19(1): 126–34.
12.
HopkinsRFLyleKBHiebJL, et al. (2016) Spaced retrieval practice increases college students’ short- and long-term retention of mathematics knowledge. Educational Psychology Review28(4): 853–73.
13.
KarpickeJDBluntJR (2011) Retrieval practice produces more learning than elaborative studying with concept mapping. Science331(6018): 772–5.
14.
KarpickeJDRoedigerHL (2008) The critical importance of retrieval for learning. Science319(5865): 966–8.
15.
KarpickeJDZarombFM (2010) Retrieval mode distinguishes the testing effect from the generation effect. Journal of Memory and Language62(3): 227–39.
16.
KarpickeJDButlerACRoedigerHLIII (2009) Metacognitive strategies in student learning: Do students practice retrieval when they study on their own?Memory17(4): 471–9.
17.
KornellNBjorkRA (2007) The promise and perils of self-regulated study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review14(2): 219–24.
18.
McCabeJ (2011) Metacognitive awareness of learning strategies in undergraduates. Memory & Cognition39(3): 462–76.
19.
MartonFSäljöR (1976) On qualitative differences in learning: I—Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology46(1): 4–11.
20.
MoreheadKRhodesMGDeLozierS (2016) Instructor and student knowledge of study strategies. Memory24(2): 257–71.
21.
PashlerHRohrerDCepedaNJ, et al. (2007) Enhancing learning and retarding forgetting: Choices and consequences. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review14(2): 187–93.
22.
PutnamALSungkhasetteeVWRoedigerHL (2016) Optimizing learning in college. Perspectives on Psychological Science11(5): 652–60.
23.
RawsonKADunloskyJ (2012) When is practice testing most effective for improving the durability and efficiency of student learning?Educational Psychology Review24(3): 419–35.
24.
RawsonKADunloskyJSciartelliSM (2013) The power of successive relearning: Improving performance on course exams and long-term retention. Educational Psychology Review25(4): 523–48.
25.
RoedigerHLButlerAC (2011) The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention. Trends in Cognitive Sciences15(1): 20–27.
26.
RowlandCA (2014) The effect of testing versus restudy on retention: A meta-analytic review of the testing effect. Psychological Bulletin140(6): 1432–63.
27.
SeabrookRBrownGDASolityJE (2005) Distributed and massed practice: From laboratory to classroom. Applied Cognitive Psychology19(1): 107–22.
ThompsonP (2017) Communication technology use and study skills. Active Learning in Higher Education18(3): 257–70.
30.
ValienteC (2008) Are students using the “wrong” style of learning? A multicultural scrutiny for helping teachers to appreciate differences. Active Learning in Higher Education9(1): 73–91.
31.
van Den HurkM (2006) The relation between self-regulated strategies and individual study time, prepared participation and achievement in a problem-based curriculum. Active Learning in Higher Education7(2): 155–69.
32.
WarburtonNVoletS (2013) Enhancing self-directed learning through a content quiz group learning assignment. Active Learning in Higher Education14(1): 9–22.
