The purpose of this study was to investigate whether achievement motivations influence the adoption of learning strategies and learning strategies influence studying behavior in an online learning environment. The Goal Orientation Questionnaire was used to measure achievement motives, and the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire was used to assess learning strategies. In addition, data on how learners tagged and annotated the learning materials were collected using software designed to aid studying and to examine studying behavior. Confirmatory factor analyses were conducted on Goal Orientation Questionnaire data from 170 university students who used the learning software to study a chapter from a textbook. Results showed that task value and effort regulation subscales from the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire positively predicted the number of notes created. In addition, mastery and performance goals positively predicted task value, and work-avoidance goals negatively predicted effort regulation and task value.
AinleyM. D. (1993) Styles of engagement with learning: Multidimensional assessment of their relationship with strategy use and school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology85: 395–405.
2.
Al-EmadiA. A. (2001) The relationships among achievement, goal-orientation, and study strategies. Social Behavior and Personality29: 823–832.
3.
AliL.HatalaM.GaševićD.WinneP. H. (2014) Leveraging MSLQ data for predicting students’ achievement goal orientations. Journal of Learning Analytics1(3): 157–160.
4.
ArcherJ. (1994) Achievement goals as measure of motivation in university students. Contemporary Educational Psychology19: 430–446.
5.
AzevedoR.CromleyJ. G. (2004) Does training on self-regulated learning facilitate students’ learning with hypermedia?Journal of Educational Psychology96: 523–535.
6.
BaggetunR.WassonB. (2006) Self-regulated learning and open writing. European Journal of Education41(3/4): 453–472.
7.
BouffardT.BoisvertJ.VezeauC.LaroucheC. (1995) The impact of goal orientation on self-regulation and performance among college students. British Journal of Educational Psychology65: 317–329.
8.
ByrneB. M. (1998) Structural equation modelling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming, Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
9.
ChoM. H.DemeiS.LaffeyJ. (2010) Relationships between self-regulation and social experiences in asynchronous online learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research21(3): 297–316.
10.
ClaytonK.BlumbergF.AuldD. P. (2010) The relationship between motivation, learning strategies and choice of environment whether traditional or including an online component. British Journal of Educational Technology41(3): 349–364.
11.
DabbaghN.KitsantasA. (2012) Personal learning environments, social media, and self-regulated learning: A natural formula for connecting formal and informal learning. The Internet and Higher Education15(1): 3–8.
12.
DahlT. I.BalsM.TuriA. L. (2005) Are students’ beliefs about knowledge and learning associated with their reported use of learning strategies?British Journal of Educational Psychology75: 257–273.
13.
DeBackerT. K.CrowsonH. M. (2006) Influences on cognitive engagement: Epistemological beliefs and need for closure. British Journal of Educational Psychology76: 535–551.
14.
DettoriG.GiannettiT.PersicoD. (2006) SRL in online cooperative learning: Implications for pre-service teacher training. European Journal of Education41(3–4): 397–414.
15.
DettoriG.PersicoD. (2008) Detecting self-regulated learning in online communities by means of interaction analysis. Learning Technologies1(1): 11–19.
16.
DisethÅ.KobbeltvedtT. (2010) A mediator analysis of achievement motives, goal orientations, learning strategies and academic achievement. British Journal of Educational Psychology80: 671–687.
17.
DowsonM.McInerneyD. M. (2001) Psychological parameters of students’ social and work avoidance goals: A qualitative investigation. Journal of Educational Psychology93: 35–42.
18.
DuncanT. G.McKeachieW. J. (2005) The making of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire. Educational Psychologist40: 117–128.
19.
DupeyratC.MarinéC. (2005) Implicit theories of intelligence, goal orientation, cognitive engagement, and achievement: A test of Dweck’s model with returning to school adults. Contemporary Educational Psychology30: 43–59.
20.
ElliotA.McGregorH. (2001) A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology80: 501–519.
21.
ElliotA. J.ChurchM. A. (1997) A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology72: 218–232.
22.
ElliotA. J.McGregorH. A.GableS. (1999) Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology91: 549–563.
23.
ElliottA. J.ShellM. M.HenryK. B. (2005) Achievement goals, performance contingencies, and performance attainment: An experimental test. Journal of Educational Psychology97: 630–640.
24.
FenollarP.RománS.CuestasP. J. (2007) University student’s academic performance: An integrative conceptual framework and empirical analysis. British Journal of Educational Psychology77: 873–891.
25.
HadwinA. F.NesbitJ. C.Jamieson-NoelD.CodeJ.WinneP. H. (2007) Examining trace data to explore self-regulated learning. Metacognition and Learning2(2–3): 107–124.
26.
HarackiewiczJ. M.BarronK. E.CarterS. M.LehtoA. T.ElliottA. J. (1997) Predictors and consequences of achievement goals in the college classroom: Maintaining interest and making the grade. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology73: 1284–1295.
27.
HwangW.-Y.WangC.-Y.SharplesM. (2007) A study of multimedia annotation of web-based materials. Computers & Education48(4): 680–699.
28.
Jamieson-NoelD. L.WinneP. H. (2003) Comparing self-reports to traces of studying behavior as representations of students’ studying and achievement. German Journal of Educational Psychology17: 159–171.
29.
JohnsonM. L.SinatraG. M. (2014) The influence of approach and avoidance goals on conceptual change. The Journal of Educational Research107(4): 312–325.
KaplanA.LichtingerE.GorodetskyM. (2009) Achievement goal orientations and self-regulation in writing: An integrative perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology101: 51–69.
32.
KaplanA.MaehrM. L. (2007) The contribution and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review19: 141–187.
33.
KaplanA.MidgleyC. (1997) The effect of achievement goals: Does level of perceived academic competence make a difference?Contemporary Educational Psychology22: 415–435.
34.
KappF.ProskeA.NarcissS.KörndleH. (2015) Distributing vs blocking learning questions in a web-based learning environment. Journal of Educational Computing Research51: 397–416.
35.
KauffmanD. F. (2004) Self-regulated learning in web-based environments: Instructional tools designed to facilitate self-regulated learning. Journal of Educating Computing Research30: 139–162.
36.
KiewraA. K.DuBoisN. F.ChristianD.McShaneA.MeyerhofferM.RoskelleyD. (1991) Note-taking functions and techniques. Journal of Educational Psychology83(2): 240–245.
37.
KingR. B.McInerneyD. M. (2014) The work avoidance goal construct: Examining its structure, antecedents, and consequences. Contemporary Educational Psychology39(1): 42–58.
38.
KramarskiB.MichalskyT. (2010) Preparing preservice teachers for self-regulated learning in the context of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Learning and Instruction20(5): 434–447.
39.
LajoieS. P. (2005) Extending the scaffolding metaphor. Instructional Science33: 541–557.
40.
LinnenbrinkE. A.PintrichP. R. (2000) Multiple pathways to learning and achievement: The role of goal orientation in fostering adaptive motivation, affect, and cognition. In: SansoneC.HarackiewiczJ. M. (eds) Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance, San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 195–227.
41.
LloydJ.AdesopeO. O.SchroederN. S. (2014) A meta-analysis of online learning in K-12, Philadelphia, PA: American Educational Research Association Annual Meeting.
42.
LomickaL. L. (1998) “To gloss or not to gloss”: An investigation of reading comprehension online. Language Learning & Technology1(2): 41–50.
43.
MakanyT.KempJ.DrorI. E. (2009) Optimising the use of note-taking as an external cognitive aid for increasing learning. British Journal of Educational Technology40(4): 619–635.
44.
MasonL.BoscoloP.TornatoraM. C.RonconiL. (2013) Besides knowledge: A cross-sectional study on the relations between epistemic beliefs, achievement goals, self-beliefs, and achievement in science. Instructional Science41: 49–79.
45.
MatugaJ. M. (2009) Self-regulation, goal orientation, and academic achievement of secondary students in online university courses. Educational Technology & Society12(3): 4–11.
46.
McLoughlinC.LeeM. J. (2010) Personalised and self-regulated learning in the Web 2.0 era: International exemplars of innovative pedagogy using social software. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology26(1): 28–43.
47.
MeeceJ. L.BlumenfeldP. C.HoyleR. H. (1988) Students’ goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology80: 514–523.
48.
MeeceJ. L.HoltK. (1993) A pattern analysis of students’ achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology85: 582–590.
49.
MiddletonM. J.MidgleyC. (1997) Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An under-explored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology89: 710–718.
50.
MuellerR. O. (1996) Basic principles of structural equation modelling: An introduction to LISREL and EQS, New York, NY: Springer.
51.
MuisK. R.WinneP. H.Jamieson-NoelD. (2007) Using a multitrait-multimethod analysis to examine conceptual similarities of three self-regulated learning inventories. British Journal of Educational Psychology77: 177–195.
52.
MurayamaK.ElliotA. J.FriedmanR. (2012) Achievement goals. In: RyanR. M. (ed.) The Oxford handbook of human motivation, Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press, pp. 191–207.
53.
NesbitJ. C.WinneP. H.Jamieson-NoelD.CodeJ.ZhouM.MacAllisterK.HadwinA. F. (2006) Using cognitive tools in gStudy to investigate how study activities covary with achievement goals. Journal of Educational Computing Research35: 339–358.
54.
NesbitJ. C.ZhouM.MahasnehR.YeungP. (2008) The Goal Orientation Questionnaire (GOQ), Burnaby, BC: Simon Fraser University.
55.
NgC. (2006) The role of achievement goals in completing a course assignment: Examining the effects of performance-approach and multiple goals. Open Learning21: 33–48.
56.
NovakE.RazzoukR.JohnsonT. E. (2012) The educational use of social annotation tools in higher education: A literature review. The Internet and Higher Education15: 39–49.
57.
PajaresF.JohnsonM. J. (1996) Self-efficacy beliefs and the writing performance of entering high school students. Psychology in the Schools33: 163–175.
58.
PajaresF.KranzlerJ. (1995) Self-efficacy beliefs and general mental ability in mathematical problem-solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology20: 426–443.
59.
PeaR. D. (1985) Beyond amplification: Using the computer to reorganize mental functioning. Educational Psychologist20: 167–182.
60.
PedhazurE. J. (1997) Multiple regression in behavioural research, 3rd ed. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace College.
61.
PhanH. P. (2007) An examination of reflective thinking, learning approaches, and self-efficacy beliefs at the University of the South Pacific. Educational Psychology27: 789–806.
62.
PhanH. P. (2009) Amalgamation of future time orientation, epistemological beliefs, achievement goals and study strategies: Empirical evidence established. British Journal of Educational Psychology79: 155–173.
63.
PiccianoA. G.SeamanJ.SheaP.SwanK. (2012) Examining the extent and nature of online learning in American K-12 education: The research initiatives of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. The Internet and Higher Education15: 127–135.
64.
PintrichP. R. (2000) Multiple goals, multiple pathways: The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology92: 544–555.
65.
PintrichP. R. (2003) A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology95: 667–686.
66.
PintrichP. R.SmithD. A. F.GarciaT.McKeachieW. J. (1991) A manual for the use of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) (Report No. NSCRIPTAL-91-B-004), Ann Arbor, MI: National Center for Research to Improve Postsecondary Teaching and Learning.
67.
RavindranB.GreeneB. A.DeBackerT. K. (2005) Predicting pre-service teachers’ cognitive engagement with goals and epistemological beliefs. The Journal of Educational Research98: 222–232.
68.
RobinsonD. H.SchrawG. (1994) Computational efficiency through visual argument: Do graphic organizers communicate relations in text too effectively?Contemporary Educational Psychology19: 399–415.
69.
SchunkD.ZimmermanB. (1994) Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational application, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
70.
SchunkD. H. (2005) Self-regulated learning: The educational legacy of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist40: 85–94.
71.
SimonsJ.DewitteS.LensW. (2004) The role of different types of instrumentality in motivation, study strategies, and performance: Know why you learn, so you’ll know what you learn!. British Journal of Educational Psychology74: 343–360.
72.
SlotteV.LonkaK. (1999) Review and process effects of spontaneous note-taking on text comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology24: 1–20.
73.
SomuncuogluY.YildirimA. (1999) Relationship between achievement goal orientations and use of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Research92: 267–277.
74.
TabachnickB. G.FidellL. S. (2007) Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.), New York, NY: Pearson.
75.
UrdanT. C.MidgleyC. (2001) Academic self-handicapping: What we know, what more there is to learn. Educational Psychology Review13: 115–138.
76.
Van YperenN. W.ElliotA. J.AnseelF. (2009) The influence of mastery-avoidance goals on performance improvement. European Journal of Social Psychology39: 932–943.
77.
WinneP. H. (1979) Experiments relating teacher’s use of higher cognitive questions to student achievement. Review of Educational Research49: 13–50.
78.
WinneP. H. (2010) Improving measurements of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist45: 267–276.
79.
WinneP. H.BakerR. S. (2013) The potentials of educational data mining for researching metacognition, motivation and self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Data Mining5(1): 1–8.
80.
WinneP. H.Jamieson-NoelD. L. (2002) Exploring students’ calibration of self reports about study tactics and achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology27: 551–572.
81.
iWinneP. H.NesbitJ. C.KumarV.HadwinA. F.LajoieS. P.AzevedoR. A.PerryN. E. (2006) Supporting self-regulated learning with gStudy software: The Learning Kit Project. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning3: 105–113.
82.
Van YperenN. W. (2006) A novel approach to assessing achievement goals in the context of the 2 × 2 framework: Identifying distinct profiles of individuals with different dominant achievement goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin32: 1432–1445.
83.
WoltersC. A.YuS. L.PintrichP. R. (1996) The relation between goal orientation and students’ motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences8: 211–238.
84.
WoolfolkA. E.WinneP. H.PerryN. E. (2009) Educational psychology, 3rd ed. Toronto, ON: Pearson.
85.
ZhouM.WinneP. H. (2009) Designing multimedia to trace goal-setting in studying. In: ZhengR. (ed.) Cognitive effects of multimedia learning, New York, NY: IGI Global, pp. 288–311.
86.
ZhouM.WinneP. H. (2012) Modeling academic achievement by self-reported versus traced goal orientation. Learning and Instruction22: 413–419.
87.
ZimmermanB. J.SchunkD. H. (1989) Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice, New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
