This study examines how academics and students from different disciplines perceive teaching and knowledge acquisition. University academics and students from both hard and soft disciplines completed the Domain-specific Epistemological Beliefs Questionnaire and the Approaches to Teaching Inventory. Results showed that academics held more student-/learning-centred and less teacher-/content-centred conceptions about teaching than students. Furthermore, prior findings on different beliefs about knowledge and teaching in different academic domains were confirmed for the entire sample. Finally, less sophisticated epistemological beliefs were associated positively with an information-transmission/teacher-centred and negatively with a student-/learning-centred view of good teaching. The findings are discussed against the background of effective teaching and the professionalization of university academics.
AmundsenCWilsonM (2012) Are we asking the right questions? A conceptual review of the educational development literature in higher education. Review of Educational Research82(1): 90–126.
2.
BendixenLDFeuchtFC (2010) Personal epistemology in the classroom: What does research and theory tell us and where do we need to go next? In: BendixenLDFeuchtFC (eds) Personal Epistemology in the Classroom: Theory, Research, and Implications for Practice. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 555–586.
3.
CohenJ (1988) Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences, 2nd edn.Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
4.
DevlinM (2006) Challenging accepted wisdom about the place of conceptions of teaching in university teaching improvement. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education18(2): 112–119.
5.
Erceg-HurnDMMirosevichVM (2008) Modern robust statistical methods – An easy way to maximize accuracy and power of your research. American Psychologist63(7): 591–601.
6.
FivesHBuehlMM (2012) Spring cleaning for the ‘messy’ construct of teachers’ beliefs: What are they? Which have been examined? What can they tell us? In: HarrisKRGrahamSUrdanT (eds) APA Educational Psychology Handbook, Vol. 2: Individual Differences and Cultural and Contextual Factors. Washington, DC: APA Psychological Association, pp. 471–499.
7.
HellmannJHPausEJucksR (2014) How can innovative teaching be taught? Insights from higher education. Psychology Learning & Teaching13(1): 43–50.
8.
HoferBK (2000) Dimensionality and disciplinary differences in personal epistemology. Contemporary Educational Psychology25(4): 378–405.
9.
HoferBKBendixenLD (2012) Personal epistemology: Theory, research, and future directions. In: HarrisKRGrahamSUrdanT (eds) APA Educational Psychology Handbook, Vol. 1: Theories, Constructs, and Critical Issues. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 227–256.
10.
HoferBKPintrichPR (1997) The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Review of Educational Research67(1): 88–140.
11.
KemberD (1997) A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics’ conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction7(3): 255–275.
12.
KemberDHongCHoA (2012) From model answers to multiple perspectives: Adapting study approaches to suit university study. Active Learning in Higher Education14(1): 23–35.
13.
KemberDLeungDYP (2011) Disciplinary differences in student ratings of teaching quality. Research in Higher Education52(3): 278–299.
14.
Lindblom-YlänneSLonkaK (1999) Individual ways of interacting with the learning environment – Are they related to study success?Learning and Instruction9(1): 1–18.
15.
Lindblom-YlänneSTrigwellKNevgiA. (2006) How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education31(3): 285–298.
16.
LübeckD (2009) Lehransätze in der Hochschullehre [Teaching approaches in higher education]. PhD Thesis, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany. Available at: http://www.diss.fu-berlin.de/diss/content/below/index.xml (accessed 9 June 2015).
17.
MuisKRBendixenLDHaerleFC (2006) Domain-generality and domain-specificity in personal epistemology research: Philosophical and empirical reflections in the development of a theoretical framework. Educational Psychology Review18(1): 3–54.
18.
NeumannRParrySBecherT (2002) Teaching and learning in their disciplinary context: A conceptual analysis. Studies in Higher Education27(4): 405–417.
19.
OttingHZwaalWTempelaarD. (2010) The structural relationship between students’ epistemological beliefs and conceptions of teaching and learning. Studies in Higher Education35(7): 741–760.
20.
ParpalaALindblom-YlänneSRytkönenH (2011) Students’ conceptions of good teaching in three different disciplines. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education36(5): 549–563.
21.
PäulerLJucksR (2013) Direkt erfragt: Die Messung von Lehrauffassungen per Fragebogen mit offenem Antwortformat [Directly asked: Measuring approaches to teaching via open question formats]. Zeitschrift für Hochschulentwicklung8(3): 95–109.
22.
PostareffLLindblom-YlänneS (2008) Variation in teachers’ descriptions of teaching: Broadening the understanding of teaching in higher education. Learning and Instruction18(2): 109–120.
23.
PrattDD (1992) Conceptions of teaching. Adult Education Quarterly42(4): 203–220.
24.
RichardsonJTE (2013) Epistemological development in higher education. Educational Research Review9: 191–206.
25.
RichterT (2004) Deutsche Version des DEBQ von Hofer [German version of Hofer’s DEBQ]. Psychologisches Institut, Universität Köln, Germany.
26.
RothGWeinstockM (2013) Teachers’ epistemological beliefs as an antecedent of autonomy-supportive teaching. Motivation and Emotion37(3): 402–412.
27.
SanderPStevensonKKingM. (2000) University students’ expectations of teaching. Studies in Higher Education25: 309–323.
28.
StesAVan PetegemP (2014) Profiling approaches to teaching in higher education: A cluster analytic study. Studies in Higher Education39(4): 644–658.
29.
TrautweinULüdtkeO (2007) Epistemological beliefs, school achievement, and college major: A large-scale, longitudinal study on the impact of certainty beliefs. Contemporary Educational Psychology32(3): 348–366.
30.
TrigwellKProsserMGinnsP (2005) Phenomenographic pedagogy and a revised Approaches to Teaching Inventory. Higher Education Research and Development24(4): 349–360.
31.
TrigwellKProsserMWaterhouseF (1999) Relations between teachers’ approaches to teaching and students’ approaches to learning. Higher Education37(1): 57–70.
32.
Van RossumEJHamerR (2010) The Meaning of Learning and Knowing. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
33.
VermuntJDVerloopN (1999) Congruence and friction between learning and teaching. Learning and Instruction9(3): 257–280.
34.
VirtanenVLindblom-YlänneS (2010) University students’ and teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning in the biosciences. Instructional Science38(4): 355–370.
