This study examines what creativity means to a group of Taiwanese music teachers and how it relates to their classroom experiences and teaching practices. The research followed a qualitative, interpretative approach. Interviews were used to gather data and were analysed according to phenomenographic principles. Analysis of the interviews indicated that two main approaches were taken by teachers regarding their experiences of creativity: a product-focused and a process-focused approach. In the product-focused approach, creativity was defined from the outside according to externally imposed factors, frames of reference and motivating forces. In the process-focused approach, creativity was defined from the inside, from the point of view of the individual involved, and in which personal agency, inclusion and collaboration were valued. The approach taken by teachers towards creativity also showed a relationship to how music education was perceived. Teachers who had a product-focused approach to creativity saw music education in terms of content, whereas those who were process focused had a meaning-oriented view of music education that valued the experience of students over the content that was taught. Similarly, a correspondence was found between how creativity was perceived and the nature of classroom interactions that varied between teacher centred and learner centred.
ÅkerlindG. S. (2005). Phenomenographic methods: A case illustration. In BowdenJ. A.GreenP. (Eds.), Doing developmental phenomenography (pp. 103–127). Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
2.
AkunoE. A. (2000–2001). A conceptual framework for research in music and music education within a cultural context. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 147(Winter), 3–8.
3.
AndiliouA.MurphyP. K. (2010). Examining variations among researchers' and teachers' conceptualizations of creativity. Educational Research Review, 5, 201–219.
4.
AshworthP.LucasU. (2000). Achieving empathy and engagement: A practical approach to the design, conduct and reporting of phenomenographic research. Studies in Higher Education, 25(3), 295–308.
5.
BakhtinM. M. (1981). Discourse in the novel. The dialogic imagination: Four essays by BakhtinM.M.HolquistM., Ed.; EmersonC.HolquistM., Trans.). Austin: University of Texas Press.
6.
BarrettM. (2005). A systems view of creativity. In ElliottD. J. (Ed.), Praxial music education: Reflections and dialogues (pp. 177–195). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
7.
BeghettoR. A.KaufmanJ. C. (2009). Intellectual estuaries: Connecting learning and creativity in programs of advanced academics. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20(2), 296–324.
8.
BerkleyR. (2001). Why is teaching composing so challenging? A survey of classroom observations and teachers' opinions. British Journal of Music Education, 18(2), 119–138.
9.
BerkleyR. (2004). Teaching composing as creative problem solving: Conceptualising composing pedagogy. British Journal of Music Education, 21(3), 239–263.
10.
BodenM. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London: Routledge.
11.
BowdenJ. A. (2005). Reflections on the phenomenographic team research process. In BowdenJ. A.GreenP. (Eds.), Doing developmental phenomenography (pp. 11–31). Melbourne: RMIT University Press.
BruceC. S. (2003). Frameworks guiding the analysis: Applied to or derived from the data?Paper presented at the proceedings EARLI experience and understanding SIG (SIG10) meeting, Australia National University, Canberra.
14.
BurnardP. (2012a). Musical creativities in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15.
BurnardP. (2012b). Rethinking 'musical creativity' and the notions of multiple creativities. In OdenaO. (Ed.), Musical creativity: Insights from music education. Farnham: Ashgate.
16.
BurnardP.FautleyM.SavageJ. (2010). Assessing creativity in the secondary school classroom: Exploring variations in teachers’ conceptions and practices. Paper presented at the XXIXth International Society for Music Education world conference, Beijing, China.
17.
BurnardP.YounkerB. A. (2002). Mapping pathways: Fostering creativity in the classroom. Music Education Research, 4(2), 245–261.
18.
ChenY.-T.WalshD. J. (2008). Understanding, experiencing, and appreciating the arts: Folk pedagogy in two elementary schools in Taiwan. International Journal of Education & the Arts, 9(6), 1–19.
19.
ChengK.-M. (2011). Pedagogy: East and west, then and now. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 43(5), 591–599.
20.
ChengV. M. Y. (2010). Tensions and dilemmas of teachers in creativity reform in a Chinese context. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(3), 120–137.
21.
CheungR. H. P. (2016). The challenge of developing creativity in a Chinese context: The effectiveness of adapting western creative pedagogy to inform creative practice. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 24(1), 141–160.
22.
ChienC.-Y.HuiA. N. N. (2010). Creativity in early childhood education: Teachers' perceptions in three Chinese societies. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 5(2), 49–60.
23.
ChiuS.-Y. (2010). A global epidemic of creative education! Shaping and implementing creative education in primary education in Taiwan. Unpublished PhD, Goldsmiths, University of London, London.
24.
CookN. (2000). Music: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
CookS. (1995). ‘Yue Ji’ 樂記 – Record of music: Introduction, translation, notes, and commentary. Asian Music, 26(2), 1–96.
26.
CraftA. (2001). Little c creativity. In CraftA.JeffreyB.LeiblingM. (Eds.), Creativity in education. London: Continuum.
27.
CraftA. (2003). The limits to creativity in education: Dilemmas for the educator. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51(2), 113–127.
28.
CraftA. (2005). Creativity in schools: Tensions and dilemmas. Abingdon: Routledge.
29.
CraftA.CreminT.BurnardP.ChappellK. (2007). Teacher stance in creative learning: A study of progression. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(2), 136–147.
30.
CrowB. (2008). Changing conceptions of educational creativity: A study of student teachers' experience of musical creativity. Music Education Research, 10(5), 373–388.
31.
CsikszentmihalyiM.WolfeR. (2000). New conceptions and research approaches to creativity: Implications of a systems perspective for creativity in education. In HellerK.MönksF. J.SternbergR. J.SubotnikR. F. (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2 ed., pp. 81–93). Oxford: Elsevier.
32.
DiakidoyI.-A. N.KanariE. (1999). Student teachers' beliefs about creativity. British Educational Research Journal, 25(2), 225–243.
33.
DoganiK. (2004). Teachers' understanding of composing in the primary classroom. Music Education Research, 6(3), 263–279.
34.
EdwardsR. (1998). A critical examination of the use of interpreters in the qualitative research process. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 24(1), 197–208.
35.
ElbazF. (1981). The teacher's “practical knowledge”: Report of a case study. Curriculum Inquiry, 11(1), 43–71.
36.
ElliottR. K. (1971). Versions of creativity. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 5(2), 139–152.
37.
EntwistleN. (1997). Introduction: Phenomenography in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 16(2), 37–41.
38.
EspositoN. (2001). From meaning to meaning: The influence of translation techniques on non-English focus group research. Qualitative Health Research, 11(4), 568–579.
39.
FeldmanD. H. (2008). Forward: Documenting creative learning, changing the world. In CraftA.CreminT.BurnardP. (Eds.), Creative learning 3–11 and how we document it (pp. xiii-xvii). Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.
40.
FryerM. (1996). Creative teaching and learning. London: Paul Chapman.
41.
FryerM.CollingsJ. A. (1991). Teachers' views about creativity. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61(2), 207–219.
42.
GardnerH. (1993). Creating minds: An anatomy of creativity seen through the lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New York: Basic Books.
43.
GhiselinB. (1963). Ultimate criteria for two levels of creativity. In TaylorC. W. (Ed.), Scientific creativity: Selected papers from the proceedings of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd University of Utah conferences (pp. 30–43). New York: Wiley.
44.
HasselgrenB.BeachD. (1997). Phenomenography: A "good-for-nothing brother" of phenomenology? Outline of an analysis. Higher Education Research & Development, 16(2), 191–202.
45.
HoW.-C. (2003). Democracy, citizenship and extra-musical learning in two Chinese communities: Hong Kong and Taiwan. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education, 33(2), 155–171.
46.
HoW.-C. (2013). Globalisation and localisation in music education in Hong Kong and Taiwan. Comparative Education, 49(2), 163–180.
47.
HoW.-C.LawW.-W. (2006). Challenges to globalisation, localisation and sinophilia in music education: A comparative study of Hong Kong, Shanghai, and Taipei. British Journal of Music Education, 23(2), 217–237.
48.
HuangX.-H.LeeJ. C.-K. (2015). Disclosing Hong Kong teacher beliefs regarding creative teaching: Five different perspectives. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 15, 37–47.
49.
HuiA. N. N.LauS. (2010). Formulation of policy and strategy in developing creativity in four Asian Chinese societies: A policy analysis. Creativity Education, 44(4), 215–235.
50.
HumphreysJ. T. (2006). Toward a reconstruction of 'creativity' in music education. British Journal of Music Education, 23(3), 351–361.
51.
JeffreyB. (2006). Creative teaching and learning: Toward a common discourse and practice. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(3), 399–414.
52.
JeffreyB.CraftA. (2001). The universalization of creativity. In CraftA.JeffreyB.LeiblingM. (Eds.), Creativity in education (pp. 1–13). London: Continuum.
53.
KatyalK. R.KingM. (2011). 'Outsiderness' and 'insiderness' in a Confucian society: Complexity of contexts. Comparative Education, 47(3), 327–341.
54.
KimK. H. (2009). Cultural influence on creativity: The relationship between Asian culture (confucianism) and creativity among Korean educators. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43(2), 73–93.
55.
KokotsakiD. (2011). Student teachers' conceptions of creativity in the secondary music classroom. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 6, 100–113.
56.
KokotsakiD. (2012). Pre-service student-teachers' conceptions of creativity in the primary music classroom. Research Studies in Music Education, 34(2), 129–156.
57.
KoutsoupidouT. (2008). Effects of different teaching styles on the development of musical creativity: Insights from interviews with music specialists. Musicae Scientae, 12(2), 311–335.
58.
KvaleS.BrinkmannS. (2009). InterViews: Learning the craft of qualitative research interviewing (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
59.
LaiM.-L. (2006). Integrated arts education: A comparative study in mainland Hong Kong and Taiwan. Paper presented at the Asia-Pacific Educational Research Association (APERA).
60.
LemanM. (1999). Music. In RuncoM. A.PritzkerS. R. (Eds.), Encylopedia of creativity. San Diego, CA: Academic.
61.
LeungB. W. (2000). Factors affecting Hong Kong secondary music teachers' application of creative music-making activities in teaching. Asia Pacific Journal of Teacher Education & Development, 3(1), 245–263.
62.
LiJ. (1997). Creativity in horizontal and vertical domains. Creativity Research Journal, 10(2 & 3), 107–132.
63.
LiJ.GardnerH. (1993). How domains constrain creativity: The case of traditional Chinese and Western painting. American Behavioral Scientist, 37(1), 94–101.
64.
LinY.-S. (2012). Adopting creative pedagogy into Asian classrooms? Case studies of primary school teachers' responses and dilemma. Journal of Education and Learning, 1(2), 205–216.
65.
LinY.-S. (2014). A third space for dialogues on creative pedagogy: Where hybridity becomes possible. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 13, 43–56.
66.
LiuS.-C.LinH.-S. (2014). Primary teachers' beliefs about scientific creativity in the classroom context. International Journal of Science Education, 36(10), 1551–1567.
67.
LubartT. I. (1999). Creativity across cultures. In SternbergR. J. (Ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 339–350). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
68.
MarkusH. R.KitayamaS. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98(2), 224–253.
69.
MartinD. S.CraftA.TillemaH. H. (2002). Developing critical and creative thinking strategies in primary school pupils: An inter-cultural study of teachers' learning. Journal of In-Service Education, 28(1), 115–134.
70.
MartonF. (1981). Phenomenography: Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177–200.
71.
MartonF. (1986). Phenomenography: A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought, 21(3), 28–49.
72.
MartonF. (1994). Phenomenography. In HusénT.PostlethwaiteT. N. (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 4424–4429). Oxford: Pergamon Press.
73.
MartonF. (2000). The structure of awareness. In BowdenJ.WalshE. (Eds.), Phenomenography (pp. 102–116). Melbourne: RMIT Publishing.
74.
MartonF.BoothS. (1997). Learning and awareness. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum
75.
MaslowA. H. (1968). Toward a psychology of being. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
76.
MatsunobuK. (2011). Creativity of formulaic learning: Pedagogy of imitation and repetition. In Sefton-GreenJ.ThomsonP.JonesK.BreslerL. (Eds.), The Routledge International Handbook of Creative Learning (pp. 45–53). London: Routledge.
MorseJ. M.BarrettM.MayanM.OlsonK.SpiersJ. (2002). Verification strategies for establishing reliability and validity in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 13–22.
82.
MumfordM. D.GustafsonS. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103(1), 27–43.
83.
National Advisory Committee on Creative and Cultural Education (NACCCE). (1999). All our futures: Creativity, culture and education. London: Department for Education and Culture.
84.
NgA. K. (2001). Why Asians are less creative than westerners. Singapore: Prentice Hall.
85.
NgA. K. (2003). A cultural model of creative and conforming behavior. Creativity Research Journal, 15(2–3), 223–233.
86.
NgA. K. (2004). Liberating the creative spirit in Asian students. Singapore: Pearson Prentice Hall
87.
NgF. Y.-F.MorrisP. (1998). The music curriculum in Hong Kong secondary schools: Intentions and constraints. International Journal of Music Education, 31(1), 37–58.
88.
NichollsJ. G. (1972). Creativity in the person who will never produce anything original and useful: The concept of creativity as a normally distributed trait. American Psychologist, 27(8), 717–727.
89.
NiuW. (2006). The development of creativity research in Chinese societies: A comparison of mainland China, Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Singapore. In KaufmanJ. C.SternbergR. (Eds.), The International Handbook of Creativity (pp. 374–394). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
90.
NiuW. (2012). Confucian ideology and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(4), 274–284.
91.
NiuW.SternbergR. (2003). Societal and school influences on student creativity: The case of China. Psychology in the Schools, 40(1), 103–114.
92.
NiuW.SternbergR. (2006). The philosophical roots of Western and Eastern creativity. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 26(1–2), 18–38.
93.
OdenaO.PlummeridgeC.WelchG. (2005). Towards an understanding of creativity in music education: A qualitative exploration of data from English secondary schools. Bulletin of the Council for Research in Music Education, 163(Winter), 9–18.
94.
ParkS.LeeS.-Y.OliverJ. S.CrammondB. (2006). Changes in science teachers' perceptions of creativity and science teaching after participating in an overseas professional development program. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 17(1), 37–64.
95.
PattonM. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, C.A.: Sage.
96.
PrawatR. S. (1992). Teachers' beliefs about teaching and learning: A constructivist perspective. American Journal of Education, 100(3), 354–395.
97.
ReidA. (1997). The hierarchical nature of meaning in music and the understanding of teaching and learning. Advancing International Perspectives, 20, 626–631.
RippleR. E. (1989). Ordinary creativity. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 14(3), 189–202.
100.
RogoffB. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
101.
SandbergJ. (2000). Understanding human competence at work: An interpretive approach. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(1), 9–25.
102.
SawyerR. K. (2004). Creative teaching: Collaborative discussion as disciplined improvisation. Educational Researcher33(2), 12–20.
103.
ShaheenR. (2010). Creativity and education. Creativity Education, 1(3), 166–169.
104.
SpendloveD.WyseD. (2008). Creative learning: Definitions and barriers. In CraftA.CreminT.BurnardP. (Eds.), Creative learning 3–11 and how we document it (pp. 11–18). Stoke on Trent: Trentham.
105.
SquiresA. (2009). Methodological challenges in cross-language qualitative research: A research review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46(2), 277–287.
106.
TempleB. (1997). Watch your tongue: Issues in translation and cross-cultural research. Sociology, 31(3), 607–618.
107.
TempleB.EdwardsR. (2002). Interpreters/translators and cross-language research: Reflexivity and border crossings. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(2), 1–12.
108.
ThrasherA. R. (1981). The sociology of Chinese music: An introduction. Asian Music, 12(2), 17–53.
109.
TobinJ.HayashiA.ZhangJ. (2011). Approaches to promoting creativity in Chinese, Japanese, and US preschools. In Sefton-GreenJ.ThomsonP.JonesK.BreslerL. (Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of creative learning (pp. 150–158). London: Routledge.
110.
TrimillosR. D. (1989). Hálau, hochschule, maystro, and ryú: Cultural approaches to music learning and teaching. International Journal of Music Education, 14, 32–43.
111.
TsaiC.-C. (2004). Conceptions of learning science among high school students in Taiwan: A phenomenographic analysis. International Journal of Science Education, 26(14), 1733-1750.
112.
VongK. L. P. (2008). Creative learning and new pedagogies in China. In CraftA.CreminT.BurnardP. (Eds.), Creative learning 3–11 and how we document it (pp. 19–26). Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.
113.
WangL.-P.HoH.-F. (2014). The market positioning and the selection of destination countries for music students from Taiwan. Music Education Research, 16(1), 1–12.
114.
WatkinsD. A.BiggsJ. B. (2001). The paradox of the Chinese learner and beyond. In WatkinsD. A.BiggsJ. B. (Eds.), Teaching the Chinese learner: Psychological and pedagogical perspectives (pp. 3–23). Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre.
115.
WellsG. (2007). Semiotic mediation, dialogue and the construction of knowledge. Human Development, 50(5), 244–274.
116.
WongM. (2005). A cross-cultural comparison of teachers' beliefs about music education and their observed practices in classroom music teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(4), 397–418.
117.
WoodsP. (1990). Teacher skills and strategies. London: Falmer.
118.
WoodsP. (1995). Creative teachers in primary schools. Buckingham: Open University Press.
119.
WoodsP. (2002). Teaching and learning in the new millennium. In DayC.SugrueC. (Eds.), Developing teaching and teachers: International research perspectives (pp. 73–91). London: Falmer.
120.
WoodsP.JeffreyB. (1996). Teachable moments: The art of teaching in primary schools. Buckingham: Open University Press.
121.
WuJ.-J.AlbaneseD. L. (2013). Imagination and creativity: Wellsprings and streams of education - the Taiwan experience. Educational Psychology, 33(5), 561–581.
122.
YatesC.PartridgeH. L.BruceC. S. (2012). Exploring information experiences through phenomenography. Library and Information Research, 36(112), 96–119.
123.
ZbainosD.AnastasopoulouA. (2012). Creativity in Greek music curricula and pedagogy: An investigation of Greek music teachers' perceptions. Creative Education, 3(1), 55–60.
