The study described looks at the effects of learning style profile of teams on the quality of materials developed in a collaborative learning process. The study was carried out on collaborative teams of four or five university students, formed through learner preferences. Learning styles of the teams were determined using Kolb's Learning Styles Inventory. The learning style profiles of each team were found to vary, and each team had at least two students with different learning styles. At the end of the process, each team produced a printed material-developing manual. Evaluation was carried out by experts via analysis of the materials from the viewpoint of content adequacy, scientific accuracy, organization and originality, the specifications of which are also provided in the study. Statistical analyses indicated some significant differences between the teams regarding the product quality. Implications for practice in terms of team formation and possible effects on performance are given.
Alderman, B. (2000) `Get Real! Collaborative Learning in Higher Education' , Journal of the Australian Association of Writing Programs4(1): http://www.griffith.edu.au/school/art/text/april00/alderman.htm [accessed 16 October 2007].
Bohlen, G.A. & Ferratt T.W. (1993) `The Effect of Learning Style and Method of Instruction on the Achievement, Efficiency and Satisfaction of End-Users Learning Computer Software', Proceedings of the 1993 Conference on Computer Personnel Research, pp. 273-83. St Louis, MO.
4.
Cook, M.J. (1997) `An Exploratory Study of Learning Styles as a Predictor of College Academic Adjustment', Fairfield University Student Psychology Journal: http://www.matthewjcook.com/research/learnstyle.pdf [accessed 16 September 2006].
5.
*Davidson-Shivers, G.V., Nowlin,B. & Lanouette, M. (2002) `Do Multimedia Lesson Structure and Learning Styles Influence Undergraduate Writing Performance?', College Student Journal36(1): 20-31.
6.
Dillenbourg, P., Baker, M., Blaye,A. & O'Malley, C. (1995) `The Evolution of Research on Collaborative Learning' , in E. Spada and P. Reiman (eds) Learning in Humans and Machine: Towards an Interdisciplinary Learning Science, pp. 189-211. Oxford : Elsevier.
7.
Donnelly, R. & Fitzmaurice, M. (2005) `Designing Modules for Learning' , in S. Moore, G. O'Neill & B. McMullin (eds) Emerging Issues in the Practice of University Learning and Teaching . Dublin: AISHE.
8.
Dunn,R. & Dunn,K. ( 1993) Teaching Secondary Students Through their Individual Learning Styles: Practical Approaches for Grades 7-12. Boston, MA : Allyn & Bacon.
9.
Erdem, M. & Akkoyunlu, B. (2002) `A Study on Effectiveness of PBL in an Elementary Social Studies Lesson with Teams of Fifth Grade Students' (in Turkish), Elementary Education Online1(1): 2-11.
10.
Felder,R.M. & Silverman,L.K. (1988) `Learning and Teaching Styles in Engineering Education', Journal of Engineering Education78(7): 674-81.
11.
Gokhale, A. . (1995) `Collaborative Learning Enhances Critical Thinking' , Journal of Technology Education7(1): 22-30.
12.
Grant, M.M. (2002) `Meridian: A Middle School Computer Technologies Journal, a service of NC State University', Raleigh, NC5(1).
Kimber, D. (1996) `Collaborative Learning in Management Education: Issues, Benefits, Problems and Solutions: A Literature Review': http://ultibase.rmit.edu.au/Articles/june96/kimbe1.htm [accessed 10 September 2006].
Kumpulainen, K. & Kaartinen, S. (2003) `The Interpersonal Dynamics of Collaborative Reasoning in Peer Interactive Dyads', Journal of Experimental Education71(4): 333-70.
17.
Mckenzie, J.F., Wood, M.L., Kotecki, J.E., Clark, J.K. & Brey R. A. ( 1999) `Establishing Content Validity: Using Qualitative and Quantitative Steps: Research Notes', American Journal of Health Behavior23(4): 311-18.
18.
Maxwell, S.E. & Delaney, H.D. (2004) Designing Experiments And Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. RUNGTUSANATHAM, M. (1998) `Let's Not Overlook Content Validity', Decision Line 29(4): 10-13.
19.
Sandmire, D.A. & Boyce, P.F. (2004) `Pairing of Opposite Learning Styles among Allied Health Students: Effects on Collaborative Performance', Journal of Allied Health33(2): 156-63.
20.
Sandmire, D.A., Vroman,K.G. & Sanders, R. . (2000). `The Influence of Learning Styles on Collaborative Performances of Allied Health Students in a Clinical Exercise', Journal of Allied Health29(3): 143-9.
21.
Sendjaya, S. (2003) `Development and Validation of Servant Leadership Behavior Scale', Proceedings of the Servant Leadership Roundtable, Regent University, Virginia Beach: http://www.regent.edu/acad/cls/2003ServantLeadershipRoundtable [accessed 15 November 2007].
22.
Siegel, S. & Castellan N.J. (1988) Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. New York: McGraw-Hill.
23.
Steenkamp, A.L. (2002) `A Standards-Based Approach to Team-Based Student Projects in an Information Technology Curriculum', Proceedings of the 17th Annual Conference of the International Academy for Information Management, pp. 54-62.
24.
Stoyanova, N. & Kommers, P. (2002) `Concept Mapping as a Medium of Shared Cognition in Computer-Supported Collaborative Problem Solving', Journal of Interactive Learning Research13(1):111-33.
25.
Summers, J.J., Beretvas, S.N., Svinicki, M.D. & Gorin,J.S. (2005) `Evaluating Collaborative Learning and Community' , Journal of Experimental Education73(3): 165-88.
26.
Van Boxtel, C. (2000) `Collaborative Concept Learning. Collaborative Learning Tasks, Student Interaction, and the Learning of Physics Concepts' , Doctoral Dissertation, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
27.
Van Den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W.H., Segers, M. & Kirschner, P.A. (2006) `Social and Cognitive Factors Driving Teamwork in Collaborative Learning Environments', Small Group Research37(5): 490-521.
28.
Von Cranach, M. (1996) `Toward a Theory of the Acting Group', in E. H. Witte and J. H. Davis (eds) Understanding Group Behavior: Small Group Processes and Interpersonal Relations, Vol. 2, pp. 147-88. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates .
