This article builds a framework for the analysis of the Inka Empire’s (1400–1532 CE) expansion in the Peruvian highlands. Drawing from recent archaeological excavations at the site of Canchaje (Huarochirí), I propose that the Inka built upon cultural familiarities between them and their subjects by using ritual emplacements (rock outcrops and plazas) as arenas of mediation. At the same time, the construction of mutual legibility enabled subjected communities to maintain and redefine their cultural practices in ways that survived the Inka Empire. By recasting the Inka from foreign conqueror to new kin within local ritual systems, the people of Huarochirí reinvented their traditions to garner political agency. Using archaeological data and colonial-period documents, I show that local agency informed empire-building, leading to the reinvention of local traditions. Ultimately, my work shows how mutual legibility was built on the ground while exploring specific instances of negotiation through ritual.
AbercrombieTA (1998) Pathways of Memory and Power: Ethnography and History Among an Andean People.
Madison:
University of Wisconsin Press.
2.
AcutoFA (2005) The materiality of Inka domination: Landscape, spectacle, memory, and ancestors. In: FunariPPZarankinA, andStovelE (eds) Global Archaeological Theory: Contextual Voices and Contemporary Thoughts.
New York:
Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, pp. 211–236.
3.
AcutoFATroncosoAFerrariA (2012)
Recognising strategies for conquered territories: A case study from the Inka North Calchaquí Valley. Antiquity86(334): 1141–1154.
4.
AstuhuamánC (2008) Los otros Pariacaca: Oráculos, montañas y parentelas sagradas [The other Pariacacas: Oracles, mountains and sacred kinships]. In: CuratolaMZiólkowskiM (eds) Adivinación y Oráculos En El Mundo Andino Antiguo [Divination and Oracles in the Ancient Andean World]. Colección Estudios Andinos 2.
Lima:
Fondo Editorial, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú - Instituto Francés de Estudios Andinos, pp. 97–119.
5.
BauerBS (2004) Ancient Cuzco: Heartland of the Inca.
Austin:
University of Texas Press.
6.
BerdanFF (2014) Aztec Archaeology and Ethnohistory.
New York:
Cambridge University Press.
7.
BerdanFFBlanton REHillBooneE, et al. (1996) Aztec Imperial Strategies.
Washington, DC:
Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection.
8.
BrayTL (2003) The Archaeology and Politics of Food and Feasting in Early States and Empires.
New York:
Kluwer Academic/Plenum.
9.
BrayTL (2014) The Archaeology of Wak’as: Explorations of the Sacred in the Pre-Columbian Andes.
Boulder:
University Press of Colorado.
10.
BrayTL (2018)
Partnering with pots: The work of objects in the imperial Inca project. Cambridge Archaeological Journal28(2): 243–257.
11.
BurgerRLMorrisCMatosR (eds) (2007) Variations in the Expression of Inka Power: A Symposium at Dumbarton Oaks, 18 and 19 October 1997.
Washington, DC [Cambridge, MA]:
Dumbarton Oaks Research Library and Collection, distributed by Harvard University Press.
12.
ChaseZ (2014) What is a wak’a? When is a wak’a? In: BrayTL (ed) The Archaeology of Wak’as: Explorations of the Sacred in the Precolumbian Andes.
Boulder:
University Press of Colorado, pp. 75–126.
13.
ChaseZ (2018) The Inca state and local ritual landscapes. In: AlconiniSCoveyA (eds) The Oxford Handbook of the Incas. Oxford andNew York:
Oxford University Press, pp. 519–540.
14.
ChristieJJ (2016) The Inka capital Cusco as the model of an imperial cultural landscape. In: ChristieJJBogdanovićJ, andGuzmánE (eds) Political Landscapes of Capital Cities.
Boulder:
University Press of Colorado, pp. 213–248.
15.
ConklinWJ (1982)
The information system of Middle Horizon quipus. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences385(1): 261–281.
16.
D’AltroyTN (2015) The Incas. 2nd ed.
Chichester and Malden, MA:
Wiley Blackwell.
17.
D’AltroyTNEarleTKBrowmanDL, et al. (1985)
Staple finance, wealth finance, and storage in the Inka political economy [and comments and reply]. Current Anthropology26(2): 187–206.
18.
D’AltroyTNLorandiAMWilliamsVI, et al. (2000)
Inka rule in the northern Calchaquí Valley,Argentina. Journal of Field Archaeology27(1): 1–26.
19.
Dávila BriceñoD (1965 [1586]) Descripción y relación de la provincia de los Yauyos toda, Anan Yauyos y Lorin Yauyos, hecha por Diego Dávila Briceño, corregidor de Huarochirí [Description and information of the Yauyos Province, Anan Yauyos and Lurin Yauyos, by Diego Dávila Briceño, corregidor of Huarochirí]. In: Jiménez de la EspadaMUrbano MartínezJ (eds) Relaciones Geográficas de Indias: Perú [Geographic Relations of the Indies: Peru].
Madrid:
Ministerio de Fomento de España, Edición Atlas, pp. 155–165.
20.
DeanC (2010) A Culture of Stone: Inka Perspectives on Rock.
Durham, NC:
Duke University Press.
21.
DennisD (1998)
Book review: Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed by James C. Scott. Culture & Agriculture20(1): 41–43.
22.
GarridoF (2016)
Rethinking imperial infrastructure: A bottom-up perspective on the Inca Road. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology43: 94–109.
23.
GaspariniGMargoliesL (1980) Inca Architecture.
Bloomington:
Indiana University Press.
24.
GoseP (1993)
Segmentary state formation and the ritual control of water under the Incas. Comparative Studies in Society and History35(3): 480–514.
25.
GosdenC (2004) Archaeology and Colonialism: Cultural Contact from 5000 BC to the Present.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
26.
Guaman Poma de AyalaF (1993 [1610?]) Nueva Corónica y Buen Gobierno [New Chronicle and Good Government].
Sección de Obras de Historia. Mexico City:
Fondo de Cultura Económica.
Hernández GaravitoCOsores MendivesC (2019)
Colonialism and domestic life: Identities and foodways in Huarochirí during the Inka Empire. International Journal of Historical Archaeology23(4): 832–867.
29.
KolataAL (2013) Ancient Inca.
Cambridge and New York:
Cambridge University Press.
30.
KosibaS (2012) Emplacing value, cultivating order: Places of conversion and practices of subordination throughout early Inka state formation (Cuzco, Peru). In: PapadopoulosJKUrtonG (eds) The Construction of Value in the Ancient World.
Los Angeles, CA:
Cotsen Institute of Archaeology Press, pp. 97–127.
31.
MagnussonW (2011) Politics of Urbanism: Seeing Like a City.
Abingdon:
Routledge.
32.
MakowskiKCórdovaMFHabetlerP, et al. (2012)
La plaza y la fiesta: Reflexiones acerca de la función de los patios en la arquitectura pública prehispánica de los periodos tardíos [The plaza and the feast: Reflecting on the function of prehispanic patios and public architecture during the late periods]. Boletín de Arqueología PUCP9: 297–333.
33.
MeddensFMMcEwanCWillisK, et al. (eds) (2014) Inca Sacred Space: Landscape, Site and Symbol in the Andes.
London:
Archetype Publications.
34.
MooreJD (1996)
The archaeology of plazas and the proxemics of ritual: Three Andean traditions. American Anthropologist98(4): 789–802.
35.
MorrisC (2013) El Palacio, La Plaza y La Fiesta En El Imperio Inca [The Palace, the Plaza and the Feast in the Inca Empire].
Lima:
Fondo Editorial.
36.
MurraJVWachtelNRevelJ (1986) The expansion of the Inka state: Armies, war, and rebellions. In: MurraJVWachtelNRevelJ (eds) Anthropological History of Andean Polities.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, pp. 49–58.
37.
SalomonF (1998)
How the huacas were: The language of substance and transformation in the Huarochirí Quechua manuscript. Anthropology and Aesthetics33: 7–17.
38.
SalomonF (2008) Huarochirí Manuscript. In: PillsburyJ (ed) Guide to Documentary Sources for Andean Studies, 1530-1900.
Norman:
University of Oklahoma Press, pp. 296–303.
39.
SalomonFUriosteGL (1991) The Huarochirí Manuscript: A Testament of Ancient and Colonial Andean Religion.
Austin:
University of Texas Press.
40.
SanhuezaC (2012) Los ‘Mojones del Inca’. Territorio, Frontera, Geografía Sagrada y ‘Cartografía’ Oral en el Desierto de Atacama [The ‘Mojones of the Inca’. Territory, Frontier, Sacred Geography and Oral ‘Cartography’ in the Atacama Desert]. PhD Dissertation, Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú, Peru.
41.
ScholtzC (2010)
Land claim negotiations and indigenous claimant legibility in Canada and New Zealand. Political Science62(1): 37–61.
42.
ScottHV (2009) Contested Territory: Mapping Peru in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries.
Notre Dame, IN:
University of Notre Dame Press.
43.
ScottJC (1998) Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed.
New Haven, CT:
Yale University Press.
44.
ScottJC (2017) Against the Grain: A Deep History of the Earliest States.
New Haven, CT:
Yale University Press.
45.
SinopoliCM (1994)
The archaeology of empires. Annual Review of Anthropology23: 159–180.
46.
SteinG (2005) The Archaeology of Colonial Encounters: Comparative Perspectives.
Santa Fe, NM and Oxford:
School of American Research Press; James Currey.
47.
SternS (1982) Peru’s Indian Peoples and the Challenge of Spanish Conquest: Huamanga to 1640.
Madison:
University of Wisconsin Press.
48.
ThomasN (1992)
The inversion of tradition. American Ethnologist19(2): 213–232.
49.
ValverdeM (2011)
Seeing like a city: The dialectic of modern and premodern ways of seeing in urban governance. Law & Society Review45(2): 277–312.
50.
van de GuchteM (1999) The Inca cognition of landscape: Archaeology, ethnohistory, and the aesthetic of alterity. In: AshmoreWKnappAB (eds) Archaeologies of Landscape: Contemporary Perspectives.
Malden, MA:
Blackwell Publishers, pp. 149–158.
51.
WernkeSA (2010)
A reduced landscape: Toward a multi-causal understanding of historic period agricultural deintensification in highland Peru. Journal of Latin American Geography9(3): 51–83.
52.
WilkinsonD (2019)
Infrastructure and inequality: An archaeology of the Inka road through the Amaybamba cloud forests. Journal of Social Archaeology19(1): 27–46.
53.
WongRB (1999)
Book review: Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed by James C. Scott. Political Science Quarterly114(2): 340–342.
54.
WoostM (2000)
Book review: Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed by James C. Scott. American Ethnologist27(3): 768–769.
