BookFun – ‘There's more to it than reading a book’ – Implementing a Danish early literacy programme that supports professionalism,language development and social inclusion
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online June, 2017
BookFun – ‘There's more to it than reading a book’ – Implementing a Danish early literacy programme that supports professionalism,language development and social inclusion
Several early literacy programmes have documented their effectiveness in enhancing children's early literacy and language development. Despite recent interest in implementing evidence-based programmes, only a few studies have set out to capture the implementation process of early literacy programmes as seen from the programme users' perspectives. The current study's purpose is to identify best practice for the successful implementation of early literacy programmes in Danish day-care centres. The empirical study presents results from a pre-post design interviewing 18 early educators to identify changes in their professional practice after the implementation of the first Danish early literacy programme based on dialogical reading. The results suggest that after the implementation (1) early educators report having changed their shared book reading practices, taken ownership of the programme and successfully integrated it into current practices, (2) the early literacy programme has supported early educators in their professional development and (3) early educators see the early literacy programme as a tool for improving social inclusion among children in day-care centres. Based on the results we conclude that reflecting on current practices, the development of a new professionalism and taking ownership are crucial processes in changing practices and in the successful implementation of new programmes.
AinscowMDysonAWeinerS (2013) From Exclusion to Inclusion: Ways of Responding in Schools to Students with Special Educational Needs, Reading, United Kingdom: CfBT Education Trust.
2.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
3.
BroströmS (2004) Modstand mod læring, Asterisk 18 [Resistance against learning].
4.
BroströmS (2010) Fiction, drawing and play in a Vygotskian perspective. In: TunaAHaydenJ (eds) Early Childhood Programs as the Doorway to Social Cohesion: Application of Vygotsky's Ideas from an East-West Perspective, Newcastle upon Tyne, Copenhagen, Denmark: Cambridge Scholars Press, pp. 77–94.
5.
BroströmSJensen de LópezKLøntoftJ (2012) Dialogisk læsning i teori og praksis, Dafolo. [Dialogical reading in theory and practice].
6.
ChambersA (1994) Tell Me: Children Reading and Talk, Stroud: Thimble Press.
7.
ClasenLEJensen de LópezK (2013) Sociale læreprocesser i den pædagogiske praksis – LæseLeg: et konkret svar på Ny Nordiske Skole?Psyke and Logos34: 106–126. [Pedagogical Practices as Social Learning – BookFun: a concrete suggestion for the New Nordic School?].
8.
ClasenLEJensen de LópezK. Practice versus politics in Danish day-care centres: How to bridge the gap in early learning?European Early Childhood Education Research Journal2017. Accepted for publication in 2017, 25(1).
9.
FarrellP (2006) Developing inclusive practices among educational psychologists: Problems and possibilities. European Journal of Psychology of Education21(3): 293–304.
10.
Fisker T (2010) Småbørn i interaktion: En undersøgelse af socialt udviklingspotentiale og muligheder for interaktion for småbørn med autisme i forskellige pædagogiske og organisatoriske miljøer. PhD thesis. Danish School of Education, Aarhus University. [Toddlers in interaction: An investigation of social potential and possibilities for interaction for toddlers with autism in different pedagogical and organisational environments].
11.
FriesenAButeraG (2012) “You introduce all of the alphabet … But I don't think it should be the main focus”: Exploring early educators' decisions about reading instruction. Early Childhood Education Journal40: 361–368.
12.
HindmanAHWasikBA (2008) Head Start teachers' beliefs about language and literacy instruction. Early Childhood Research Quarterly23: 479–492.
13.
HirstKHannonPNutbrownC (2010) Effects of a preschool bilingual family literacy programme. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy10(2): 183–208.
14.
HowittD (2013) Introduction to qualitative methods in psychology, Harlow: Pearson Education.
15.
JensenABroströmSHansenOH (2010) Critical perspectives on Danish early childhood education and care: Between the technical and the political. Early Years30(3): 243–254.
16.
JensenBBrandiUKousholtD (2011) VIDA-statusrapport 2: Vidensbaseret indsats for udsatte børn i dagtilbud. VIDA forskningsserien 2011–2013. [VIDA progress report: Knowledge-based intervention for vulnerable children in day-care services].
17.
JensenBRasbechM (2008) Implementeringsprocesser i pædagogisk praksis. Om konkretisering af ideer i en med HPA-projektet som eksempel. Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitetsforlag. [Implementation processes in pedagogical practices. On the clarification of ideas in a process of development using the HPA project as an example].
18.
Jensen de LópezKClasenLE (2016) BookFun is more supportive of early literacy than reading-as-usual: A randomized controlled trial study in a Danish day-care centre setting. Manuscript in progress. .
19.
KennedyA (2005) Models of continuing professional development – A framework for analysis. Journal of In-service Education31(2): 235–250.
20.
KusimaMSandbergA (2008) Preschool teachers' and student preschool teachers' thoughts about professionalism in Sweden. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal16(2): 186–195.
21.
KvaleSBrinkmannS (2009) Interview – Introduktion til et Håndværk, 2nd ed. Copenhagen: Hans Reitzels Forlag.[Interview – introduction to craftsmanship].
22.
LæseLeg (BookFun). Available at: www.læseleg.dk (accessed 25 June 2014).
23.
LeverRSénéchalM (2011) Discussing stories: On how a dialogic reading intervention improves kindergartners' oral narrative construction. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology108: 1–24.
24.
LoniganCJWhitehurstGJ (1998) Relative efficacy of parent and teacher involvement in a shared-reading intervention for preschool children from low-income backgrounds. Early Childhood Research Quarterly13(2): 263–290.
25.
MayC (2013) Towards a general theory of implementation. Implementation Science8(18): 1–14.
26.
NorlingM (2014) Preschool staff's view of emergent literacy approaches in Swedish preschools. Early Child Development and Care184(4): 571–588.
27.
SandvikJMvan DallVHPAdérHJ (2014) Emergent literacy: Preschool teachers' beliefs and practices. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy14(1): 28–52.
28.
Sanford DeRousieRBiermanK (2012) Examining the sustainability of an evidence-based preschool curriculum: The REDI program. Early Childhood Research Quarterly27: 55–66.
29.
SommerfeldP (2005) Evidence-Based Social Work – Towards a New Professionalism? Introduction, Bern: Peter Lang AG, Academic Publishers.
30.
StirmanSWKimberlyJCookN (2012) The sustainability of new programs and innovations: A review of the empirical literature and recommendations for future research. Implementation Science7(17): 1–19.
31.
The National Professional Development Center on Inclusion (2008) What Do We Mean by Professional Development in the Early Childhood Field?, Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina, FPG Child Development Institute.
Ulvseth H (2012) Nordic education systems – primary and lower secondary school. In: Egelund N (ed.) Northern Lights on PISA 2009 - focus on reading. TemaNord: 501, Copenhagen, Denmark: Nordic Council of Ministers.
34.
UNESCO (1994) Salamanca statement of principles, policy and practice in special needs education. In: World Conference on Special Needs Education: Access and Quality, Salamanca, United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. Available at: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0009/000984/098427eo.pdf.
35.
VygotskyLS (1978) Mind in Society, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
