Data from a small randomized control trial of teachers’ use of Data-Based Instruction (DBI) for early writing were analyzed to determine the influence of teacher knowledge, skills, and treatment fidelity on student Curriculum-Based Measurement (CBM) slope. Participants included 11 elementary grade teachers who delivered intensive intervention in early writing and their students (n = 31), all identified as either at risk for or with disabilities that affect their writing. Teachers received professional development and ongoing coaching to support the implementation of DBI for improving their students’ early writing skills. Results from a multiple regression analysis suggest that teacher knowledge and skills in DBI was strongly related to student CBM slope in early writing (p < .01) and a small but significant relation between fidelity of writing instruction and student CBM slope (p < .01). Implications for instructional coaching and improving student writing progress are discussed.
ArmorD.Conroy-OsegueraP.CoxM.KingN.McDonnellL.PascalA.PaulyE.ZellmanG. (1976). Analysis of the school preferred reading programs in selected Los Angeles minority schools (Rep. No. R-2007-LAUSD). RAND. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 130 243)
2.
BerningerV. W. (2009). Highlights of programmatic, interdisciplinary research on writing. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(2), 69–80.
3.
BerningerV. W.VaughanK.AbbottR. D.BegayK.ColemanK. B.CurtinG.HawkinsJ. M.GrahamS. (2002). Teaching spelling and composition alone and together: Implications for the simple view of writing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.94.2.291
CoyneM. D.SimmonsD. C.Hagan-BurkeS.SimmonsL. E.KwokO.-M.KimM.FogartyM.OslundE. L.TaylorA. B.Capozzoli-OldhamA.WareS.LittleM. E.RawlinsonD. M. (2013). Adjusting beginning reading intervention based on student performance: An experimental evaluation. Exceptional Children, 80(1), 25–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291308000101
6.
CunninghamA. E.PerryK. E.StanovichK. E.StanovichP. J. (2004). Disciplinary knowledge of K-3 teachers and their knowledge calibration in the domain of early literacy. Annals of Dyslexia, 54(l), 139–167.
7.
CutlerL.GrahamS. (2008). Primary grade writing instruction: A national survey. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(4), 907–919. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012656
DenoS. L.MirkinP. K. (1977). Data-based program modification: A manual. Council for Exceptional Children.
10.
DesimoneL. (2002). How can comprehensive school reform models be successfully implemented?Review of Educational Research, 72(3), 433–479.
11.
FuchsD.FuchsL. S.SteckerP. M. (2010). The “blurring” of special education in a new continuum of general education placements and services. Exceptional Children, 76(3), 301–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291007600304
12.
FuchsL. S.DenoS. L.MirkinP. K. (1984). The effects of frequent Curriculum-Based Measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21(2), 449–460.
13.
GerstenR.FuchsL. S.ComptonD.CoyneM.GreenwoodC.InnocentiM. S. (2005). Quality indicators for group experimental and quasi-experimental research in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100202
14.
GrahamS.HarrisK.FinkB.MacArthurC. A. (2001). Teacher efficacy in writing: A construct validation with primary grade teachers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 177–202. https://doi.org/10.1207/S1532799Xssr0502_3
15.
GreshamF. M.MacMillanD. L.Beebe-FrankenbergerM. E.BocianK. M. (2000). Treatment integrity in learning disabilities intervention research: Do we really know how treatments are implemented?Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 15(4), 198–205.
16.
HamptonD. D.LembkeE. S. (2016). Examining the technical adequacy of progress monitoring using early writing curriculum-based measures. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 32(4), 336–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573569.2014.973984
17.
JohnsonL. D.McMasterK. L. (2013). Adapting research-based practices with fidelity: Flexibility by design. In CookB. G.TankersleyM. G.LandrumT. J. (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities: Vol. 26. Evidence-based practices (pp. 65–91). Emerald Group Publishing.
18.
JungP.-G.McMasterK. L.DelMasR. C. (2017). Effects of early writing intervention delivered within a data-based instruction framework. Exceptional Children, 83(3), 281–297. https://doi.org/10.1177/0014402916667586
19.
JungP.-G.McMasterK. L.KunkelA. K.ShinJ.SteckerP. M. (2018). Effects of data-based individualization for students with intensive learning needs: A meta-analysis. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 33(3), 144–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/ldrp.12172
20.
KimY.-S.Al OtaibaS.SidlerJ. F.GruelichL. (2013). Language, literacy, attentional behaviors, and instructional quality predictors of written composition for first graders. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 28(3), 461–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2013.01.001
21.
KraftM. A.BlazarD.HoganD. (2018). The effect of teacher coaching on instruction and achievement: A meta-analysis of the causal evidence. Review of Educational Research, 88(4), 547–588. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318759268
22.
KretlowA. G.BartholomewC. C. (2010). Using coaching to improve the fidelity of evidence-based practices: A review of studies. Teacher Education and Special Education, 33(4), 279–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406410371643
23.
KretlowA. G.CookeN. L.WoodC. L. (2012). Using in-service and coaching to increase teachers’ accurate use of research-based strategies. Remedial and Special Education, 33(6), 348–361. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932510395397
24.
KretlowA. G.WoodC. L.CookeN. L. (2011). Using in-service and coaching to increase kindergarten teachers’ accurate delivery of group instructional units. The Journal of Special Education, 44(4), 234–246. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022466909341333
25.
LembkeE. S.CarlisleA.PochA. (2015). Technical report #1 for the DBI-TLC project: Curriculum-Based Measurement screening study 1. University of Minnesota.
26.
LembkeE. S.DenoS. L.HallK. (2003). Identifying an indicator of growth in early writing proficiency for elementary school students. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 28(3–4), 23–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/073724770302800304
27.
LembkeE. S.McMasterK. L.SmithR. A.AllenA.BrandesD.WagnerK. (2018). Professional development for data-based instruction in early writing: Tools, learning, and collaborative support. Teacher Education and Special Education, 41(2), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406417730112
28.
LemonsC. J.Al OtaibaS.ConwayS. J.MelladoDeLa CruzV. (2016). Improving professional development to enhance reading outcomes for students in special education. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 154, 87–104.
29.
MarshJ. A.McCombsJ. S.MartorellF. (2010). How instructional coaches support data-driven decision making. Educational Policy, 24(6), 872–907. https://doi.org/10.1177/0895904809341467
30.
McInerneyM.ZumetaR. O.GandhiA. G.GerstenR. (2014). Building and sustaining complex systems: Addressing common challenges to implementing intensive intervention. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 46(4), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1177/0040059914523763
31.
McMasterK. L.DuX.PétursdóttirA.-L. (2009). Technical features of curriculum-based measures for beginning writers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(1), 41–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219408326212
32.
McMasterK. L.DuX.YeoS.DenoS. L.ParkerD.EllisT. (2011). Curriculum-based measures of beginning writing: Technical features of the slope. Exceptional Children, 77(2), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440291107700203
33.
McMasterK. L.LembkeE. S.ShinJ.PochA.SmithR. A.JungP.AllenA.WagnerK. (2020). Supporting teachers’ use of data-based instruction to improve students’ early writing skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112, 1–21.
34.
McMasterK. L.RitcheyK. D.LembkeE. (2011). Curriculum-Based Measurement for beginning writers: Recent developments and future directions. In ScruggsT. E.MastropieriM. A. (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disabilities: Vol. 24. Assessment and intervention (pp. 111–148). Emerald Group Publishing.
The National Commission on Writing. (2003). The neglected “R”: The need for a writing evolution.
39.
National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts.
40.
O’DonnellC. L. (2008). Defining, conceptualizing, and measuring fidelity of implementation and its relationship to outcomes in K-12 curriculum intervention research. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 33–84. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313793
41.
RaudenbushS. W.BrykA. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Sage.
42.
SanettiL. M. H.KratochwillT. R. (2009). Toward developing a science of treatment integrity: Introduction to the special series. School Psychology Review, 38(4), 445–459.
43.
SnyderP. A.HemmeterM. L.FoxL. (2015). Supporting implementation of evidence-based practices through practice-based coaching. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 35(3), 133–143. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121415594925
44.
Spear-SwerlingL.ZibulskyJ. (2014). Making time for literacy: Teacher knowledge and time allocation in instructional planning. Reading and Writing, 27, 1353–1378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9491-y
45.
SteckerP. M.FuchsL. S.FuchsD. (2005). Using Curriculum-Based Measurement to improve student achievement: Review of research. Psychology in the Schools, 42(8), 795–819. https://doi.org/10.1002/pits.20113
46.
TroiaG. A.LinS. J. C.CohenS.MonroeB. W. (2011). A year in the writing workshop: Linking writing instruction practices and teachers’ epistemologies and beliefs about writing instruction. The Elementary School Journal, 112, 155–182. https://doi.org/10.1086/660688
47.
WanzekJ.VaughnS. (2009). Students demonstrating persistent low response to reading intervention: Three case studies. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(3), 151–163.
48.
WayneA. J.YoungsP. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: A review. Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 89–122.
49.
ZumetaR. O. (2015). Implementing intensive intervention: How do we get there from here?Remedial and Special Education, 36(2), 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932514558935
