This paper attends to the creation and effects of arts-based artifacts when inquiring into teacher embodiment within practices of inclusive education. Taking a postqualitative approach, we engaged in “making” data with four teacher participants, including an embodied poem, digital boards, and an affective storyboard. These artifacts reflect our conversations with participants and present portals back into them, enlivening and alerting us to the process and qualities of the inquiry. We discuss our process of getting lost with the multimodal artifacts in a way that allowed us to open up to the emergent properties of inquiry through a refusal of certainty, temporal disruptions, and an entangled emergence.
AlaimoSHekman (2008) Material Feminisms. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
4.
ArtilesAJKozleskiEB (2007) Beyond convictions: Interrogating culture, history, and power in inclusive education. Language Arts84: 357–364.
5.
AshbyC (2012) Disability studies and inclusive teacher preparation: A socially just path for teacher education. Research and Practice for Persons with Severe Disabilities37(2): 89–99.
6.
BaradK (2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Chicago: Duke University Press.
CirellAMSweetJD (2020) A posthumanist unsmoothing of narrative smoothing. Qualitative Inquiry26(10): 1184–1195.
9.
CooleDFrostS (2010) Introducing the new materialisms. In: New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1–43.
10.
DaviesB (2021) Entanglement in the World’s Becoming and the Doing of New Materialist Inquiry. New York, NY: Routledge.
11.
DeleuzeGGuattariF (1988) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: Athlone Press.
12.
DerridaJ (1994) Specters of Marx. New York, NY: Routledge.
13.
EllingsonLL (2017) Embodiment in Qualitative Research. New York, NY: Routledge.
14.
EllingsonLLSotirinP (2019) Data engagement: A critical materialist framework for making data in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry26(7): 817–826.
15.
FerriBAConnorDJ (2006) Reading Resistance: Discourses of Exclusion in Desegregation & Inclusion Debates (Vol. 1). Peter Lang.
16.
FoxNJAllredP (2015) New materialist social inquiry: Designs, method and the research-assemblage. International Journal of Social Research Methodology18(4): 339–414.
17.
Franklin-PhippsA (2020) Art encounters, racism, and teacher education. In: DernikosBLeskoNMcCallSDNiccoliniA (eds) Mapping the Affective Turn in Education. Taylor & Francis, 122–140.
18.
HalberstamJ (2011) The Queer Art of Failure. Duke University Press.
19.
HolbrookTPourchierNM (2014) Collage as analysis: Remixing in the crisis of doubt. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6): 754–763.
20.
KabaM (2021) We Do This ’Til We Free Us: Abolitionist Organizing and Transforming Justice (Vol. 1). Haymarket Books.
21.
KleinETaylorMForgaszR (2019) Using embodied practices with preservice teachers: Teaching and reflecting through the body to re-think teacher education. Journal of Practitioner Research4(2): 4.
22.
LathamA (2003) Research, performance, and doing human geography: Some reflections on the diary-photograph diary-interview method. Environment & Planning A35: 1993–2017.
23.
LatherP (2007) Getting Lost: Feminist Efforts Towards a Double(d) Science. State University of New York Press.
24.
MacLureM (2013) Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education26(6): 658–667.
25.
MacLureM (2021) Inquiry as divination. Qualitative Inquiry27(5): 502–511.
26.
ManningE (2016) The Minor Gesture. Duke University Press.
27.
ManningE (2020) Radical pedagogies and metamodelings of knowledge in the making. Critical Studies in Teaching and Learning8(SI): 1–16.
28.
ManningEMassumiB (2014) Thought in the Act: Passages in the Ecology of Experience. University of Minnesota Press.
29.
McKayL (2016) Beginning teachers and inclusive education: Frustrations, dilemmas and growth. International Journal of Inclusive Education20(4): 383–396.
30.
MurrisKBozalekV (2019) Diffraction and response-able reading of texts: The relational ontologies of Barad and Deleuze. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education51(14): 1504–1517.
31.
NaraianSKhoja-MooljiS (2016) Happy places, horrible times, and scary learners: Affective performances and sticky objects in inclusive classrooms. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education29(9): 1131–1147.
32.
NaraianSSchlessingerS (2018) Becoming an inclusive educator: Agentive maneuverings in collaboratively taught classrooms. Teaching and Teacher Education71: 179–189.
33.
OylerC (2011) Preparing teachers of young children to be social justice-oriented educators. In: FennimoreBSGoodwinAL (eds) Promoting Social Justice for Young Children. New York, NY: Springer Science & Business Media, 147–161.
34.
PriceD (2015) Pedagogies for inclusion of students with disabilities in a national curriculum: A central human capabilities approach. The Journal of Educational Enquiry14(2).
35.
RosiekJLSnyderJ (2020) Narrative inquiry and new materialism: Stories as (not necessarily benign) agents. Qualitative Inquiry26(10): 1151–1162.
36.
SpringgayS (2008) An ethics of embodiment. In: IrwinRLGouzouasisPSpringgaySLeggoCD (eds) Being with a/r/tography. Brill, 153–167.
37.
SpringgaySTrumanSE (2018) On the need for methods beyond proceduralism: Speculative middles, (in)tensions, and response-ability in research. Qualitative Inquiry24(3): 203–214.
38.
StillmanJ (2011) Teacher learning in an era of high-stakes accountability: Productive tension and critical professional practice. Teachers College Record113(1): 133–180.
39.
St. PierreEA (2019) Post-qualitative inquiry in an ontology of immanence. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(1): 3–16.
40.
TaguchiHL (2012) A diffractive and Deleuzian approach to analysing interview data. Feminist Theory13(3): 265–281.
41.
TaubmanPM (2012) Disavowed Knowledge: Psychoanalysis, Education, and Teaching. New York, NY: Routledge.
