Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2019-2
Attuning to Crisscross Applesauce as Affective Flow and Material Agency in a Public K-5 Classroom: Studying School-Based Mindfulness Under Sociomaterial Circumstances
In this article, the authors illustrate efforts toward adopting methods germane to the emerging field of sociomaterial studies while examining the integration of schoolwide mindfulness practices. Informed by a posthumanist perspective, sociomaterial studies in education work to reveal the ways in which the bodily and other material aspects of educational practice are entangled with the social contexts of schooling. Significance of this discussion includes the ways in which aspects of the study’s methodology shift conventional humanist models for researching educational meanings held by students, teachers, and researchers, to include a perspective that promotes a focus on the social-with-material dimensions of data, analysis and their multisensory productions.
AdamsC. A.ThompsonT. L. (2011). Interviewing objects: Including educational technologies as qualitative research participants. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 24, 733-750.
2.
AlaimoT.HekmanS. (Eds.). (2008). Material feminisms. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
3.
BaradK. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
4.
BennettJ. (2010). Vibrant matter: A political ecology of things. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
5.
BennettL. (2016). Thinking like a brick: Posthumanism and building materials. In TaylorC. A.HughesC. (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education (pp. 58-74). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
6.
BlackD. S.FernandoR. (2014). Mindfulness training and classroom behavior among lower-income and ethnic minority elementary school children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, 23, 1242-1246. doi:10.1007/s10826-013-9784-4
BraidottiR. (2006). Transpositions: On nomadic ethics. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
9.
BraidottiR. (2013). The posthuman. Malden, MA: Polity Press.
10.
CalderónJ. M. (2014). “Tinkuy”: The encounter between the Peruvian imaginary and the expressive arts (Unpublished doctoral thesis). The European Graduate School, Saas-Fee, Switzerland.
11.
Calle-GruberM.CixousH. (1997). Rootprints: Memory and life writing (PrenowitzE., Trans.). New York, NY: Routledge.
12.
CannonJ. (2016). Education as the practice of freedom: A social justice proposal for mindfulness educators. In PurserR. E.FornesD.BurkeA. (Eds.), Handbook of mindfulness: Culture, context and social engagement (pp. 397-409). New York, NY: Springer.
13.
Clark/KeefeK. (2014). Suspended animation: Attuning to material-discursive data and attending via art making during somatographic inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 790-800. DOI: 10.1177/1077800414530263
14.
Clark/KeefeK. (2010). Invoking Mnemosyne: Art, memory and the uncertain emergence of a feminist embodied methodology. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense Publications.
15.
Clark/KeefeK.GilwayJ.MillerE. (2017). Crafting maps, attuning to flesh, and dancing the radicant: Mobilizing the expressive arts and arts-based research to do a conceptual translation of ‘science as usual’. In LevineE. G.LevineS. K. (Eds.), The Play of Poiesis: Expressive Arts in Therapy, Education, Research and Social and Ecological Change. London: Jessica Kingsley Publications.
16.
DazaS.HuckabyM. F. (2014). Terra incognita: Em-bodied data analysis. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 801-810.
17.
DeleuzeG. (1990). The logic of sense (BoundasC., Ed., LesterM.StivaleC., Trans.). New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
18.
DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (2017). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
19.
DubreuilL. (2015). The intellective space: Thinking beyond cognition. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
20.
EllingsonL. L. (2017). Embodiment in qualitative research. New York, NY: Routledge.
21.
GouldL. F.DariotisJ. K.GreenbergM. T.MendelsonT. (2016). Assessing fidelity of implementation (FOI) for school based mindfulness and yoga interventions: A systematic review. Mindfulness, 16(1), 5-33.
22.
FelverJ. C.Celis-de HoyosC. E.TezanosK.SinghN. N. (2016). A systematic review of mindfulness-based interventions for youth in school settings. Mindfulness, 7(1), 34-45.
23.
FelverJ. C.JenningsP. A. (2016). Applications of mindfulness-based interventions in school settings: An introduction. Mindfulness, 16(1), 1-4.
24.
FenwickT.EdwardsR.SawchukP. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: Tracing the sociomaterial. New York, NY: Routledge.
25.
FenwickT.LandriP. (Eds.). (2014). Materialities, textures and pedagogies. New York, NY: Routledge.
26.
GannonS. (2016). “Local girl befriends vicious bear”: Unleashing educational aspiration through a pedagogy of material-semiotic entanglement. In TaylorC. A.HughesC. (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education (pp. 128-148). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
27.
GerrardJ.RudolphS.SriprakashA. (2017). The politics of post-qualitative research: History and power. Qualitative Inquiry, 23, 384-394. doi:10.1177/1077800416672694
28.
GreeneJ. C. (2013). On rhizomes, lines of flight, mangles, and other assemblages. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 749-758. doi:10.1080/09518398.2013.788763
29.
HainesS.Clark/KeefeK.TinkerA.KotsiopoulosA.Gerstl-PepinC.ShepherdK. G.. . . MilhomensM. (2017). “Let’s just stop and take a breath”: A community-driven approach to mindfulness practice in a high poverty elementary school. Learning Landscapes Journal, 10, 189-205. Retrieved from http://www.learninglandscapes.ca/index.php/learnland/article/view/810
30.
HolmesR.JonesL. (2016). Flickering, spilling and diffusing body/knowledge in the posthuman early years. In TaylorC. A.HughesC. (Eds.), Posthuman research practices in education (pp. 108-127). New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
31.
IngoldT. (2011). Being alive: Essays on movement, knowledge and description. New York, NY: Routledge.
32.
JacksonA. Y.MazzeiL. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. New York, NY: Routledge.
33.
Kabat-ZinnJ. (2013). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. New York, NY: Bantam Books.
34.
LatherP.St. PierreE. A. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 629-633.
35.
LatourB. (2005). Reassembling the social: An introduction to actor-network-theory. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
36.
LawJ. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. New York, NY: Routledge.
37.
LawJ. (2009). Actor network theory and material semiotics. In TurnerB. S. (Ed.), The new Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 141-158). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
38.
MacLureM. (2010). The offence of theory. Journal of Education Policy, 25, 277-286.
39.
MacLureM. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in posthumanist methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 658-667.
40.
MacLureM. (2015). The “new materialisms”: A thorn in the flesh of critical qualitative inquiry? In CannellaG.PerezM. S.PasqueP. (Eds.), Critical qualitative inquiry: Foundations and futures (pp. 93-112). New York, NY: Routledge.
41.
MacLureM. (2016). The refrain of the a-grammatical child: Finding another language in/for qualitative research. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16, 173-182.
42.
MacLureM. (2017). Qualitative methodology and the new materialisms: “A little of Dionysus’ blood?” In DenzinN. K.GiardinaM. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in neoliberal times (pp. 48-58). New York, NY: Routledge.
43.
ManningE. (2014). Wondering the world directly—or, how movement outruns the subject. Body & Society, 20(3-4), 162-188.
PintoS. (2015). The ontology of love: A framework for re-indigenizing community (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Union Institute & University, Cincinnati, OH.
50.
RempelK. D. (2012). Mindfulness for children and youth: A review of the literature with an argument for school-based implementation. Canadian Journal of Counseling and Psychotherapy, 46, 201-220.
51.
RotasN. (2015). Ecologies of praxis: Teaching and learning against the obvious. In SnazaN.WeaverJ. (Eds.), Posthumanism and Educational Research (pp. 91-103). London: Routledge.
52.
SchillingC. (2012). The body and social theory (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53.
Schonert-ReichlK. A.RoeserR. W. (Eds.). (2016). Handbook of mindfulness in education: Integrating theory and research into practice. New York, NY: Springer.
54.
SigmanM.PeñaM.GoldinA. P.RibeiroS. (2014). Neuroscience and education: Prime time to build the bridge. Nature Neuroscience, 17, 497-502. doi:10.1038/nn.3672
55.
SmithL. T. (2012). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Zed Books.
56.
SnazaN.WeaverJ. (Eds.) (2015). Posthumanism and educational research. New York, NY: Routledge.
57.
StewartK. (2007). Ordinary affects. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
58.
StewartK. (2008). Cultural poesis: The generativity of emergent things. In DenzinN. K. (Ed.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials (pp. 565-586). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
59.
St. PierreE. A. (2015). Refusing human being in humanist qualitative inquiry. In DenzinN. K.GiardinaM. D. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry—Past, present, and future: A critical reader (pp. 103-118). Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.
60.
TaylorC. A.HughesC. (Eds.). (2016). Posthuman research practices in education. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
61.
TaylorC. A.IvinsonG. (2013). Material feminism: New directions for education. Gender and Education, 25, 665-670. doi:10.1080/09540253.2013.834617
62.
WexlerB. E. (2006). Brain and culture: Neurobiology, ideology, and social change. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
63.
WolfC. (2010). What is posthumanism?Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
