The authors explore different wonderings to illustrate some possible ways in which postqualitative inquiry and scholarship is becoming and shaping the lives of scholars. To do this, we draw from previous work in arts-influenced inquiry and make connections with arts-based research and “research-creation” to explore how researchers can generate possibilities and becoming through the process of creating art in a purposefully relational manner. In these creations, our becomings intersect with shadow-philosophy, each other, and event happenings we conducted with postqualitative researchers. Rather than conceptually discussing various forms of postqualitative inquiry, we attempt to practice it. In this way, we use arts-inspired research to explore intersections between research and creation. These types of relational encounters produce thinking and materials which belong to life, senses, and affect, and could have a (scholarly) life of their own.
AranyosiI. (2007). Shadows of constitution. The Monist, 90, 415-431.
2.
BirdC. M. (2005). How I stopped dreading and learned to love transcription. Qualitative Inquiry, 11, 226-248. doi:10.1177/1077800404273413
3.
BucholtzM. (2000). The politics of transcription. Journal of Pragmatics, 32, 1439-1465.
4.
CannellaG.LincolnD. (2018). Ethics, research regulations, and critical social science. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 83-96). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5.
CannonS. O. (2018). Teasing transcription: Iterations in the liminal space between voice and text. Qualitative Inquiry, 24, 571-582.
DeleuzeG. (1994). Difference and repetition. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
8.
DeleuzeG.GuattariF. (1987). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia (MassumiB., Trans.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. (Original work published 1980)
9.
DenzinN.LincolnY. (2006). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 1-32). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10.
FinleyS. (2018). Critical arts-based inquiry: Performances of resistance politics. In DenzinN.LincolnY. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed., pp. 561-575). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11.
GerrardJ.RudolphS.SriprakashA. (2017). The politics of post-qualitative inquiry: History and power. Qualitative Inquiry, 23, 384-394.
12.
GreeneJ. C. (2013). On rhizomes, lines of flight, mangles, and other assemblages. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 749-758.
13.
JacksonA. Y.MazzeiL. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research: Viewing data across multiple perspectives. London, England: Routledge.
14.
JohanssonL. (2016). Post-qualitative line of flight and the confabulative conversation: A methodological ethnography. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 29, 445-466.
Koro-LjungbergM.CarlsonD.TesarM.AndersonK. (2015). Methodology brut: Philosophy, ecstatic thinking, and some other (unfinished) things. Qualitative Inquiry, 21, 612-619.
17.
Koro-LjungbergM.LöytönenT.TesarM. (Eds.). (2017), Disrupting data in qualitative inquiry: Entanglements with the post-critical and post-anthropocentric. New York, NY: Peter Lang.
18.
LatherP. (2016). Top ten+ list: (Re)thinking ontology in (post)qualitative research. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16, 125-131.
19.
LatherP. (2017). (Post) critical methodologies: The science possible after the critiques: The selected works of Patti Lather. London, England: Routledge.
20.
LatherP.St. PierreE. A. (2013). Post-qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 629-633.
21.
LeavyP. (2015). Method meets art: Arts-based research practice. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
22.
LemertC. (2007). Thinking the unthinkable: The riddles of classical social theories. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
23.
Lenz TaguchiH. (2016). “The concept as method” Tracing-and-mapping the problem of the neuro(n) in the field of education. Cultural Studies ↔ Critical Methodologies, 16, 213-223.
24.
Lenz TaguchiH.St. PierreE. A. (2017). Using concept as method in educational and social science inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23, 643-648.
25.
LoweE. J. (2009). Reviews [Review of the book Seeing dark things: The philosophy of shadows by Roy Sorensen]. Philosophy, 84, 615-619.
26.
MacLureM. (2013). Researching without representation? Language and materiality in post-qualitative methodology. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 26, 658-667.
27.
ManningE. (2007). Politics of touch: Sense movement, sovereignty. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
28.
ManningE. (2013). Always more than one: Individuation’s dance. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
29.
ManningE. (2015). Against method. In VanniniP. (Ed.), Non-representational methodologies: Re-envisioning research (pp. 52-71). New York, NY: Routledge.
30.
ManningE. (2016). The minor gesture. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
31.
ManningE.MassumiB. (2014). Thought in the act: Passages in the ecology of experience. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
32.
NietzscheF. (2005). Human, all too human. A book for free spirits (HollingdaleR. J., Trans.). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Original work published 1878-1880)
RotasN.SpringgayS. (2014). How do you make a classroom operate like a work of art? Deleuzeguattarian methodologies of research-creation. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 28, 552-572.
36.
St. PierreE. A. (2011). Post qualitative research: The critique and the coming after. In DenzinN. K.LincolnY. S. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative inquiry (4th ed., pp. 611-635). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
37.
St. PierreE. A. (2017a). Haecceity: Laying out a plane for post qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 23, 686-698.
38.
St. PierreE. A. (2017b). Post qualitative inquiry: The next generation. In DenzinN. K.GiardinaM. D. (Eds.), Qualitative inquiry in neo-liberal times (pp. 37-47). New York, NY: Routledge.
39.
St. PierreE. A. (2018). Writing post qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry, 24, 603-608.
40.
St. PierreE. A.JacksonA. Y. (2014). Qualitative data analysis after coding. Qualitative Inquiry, 20, 715-719.
41.
SheltonS. A.FlintM. A. (2019). The value of transcription in encouraging researcher reflexivity. SAGE Research Methods Cases. Advance online publication. doi:10.4135/9781526477705
42.
SorensenR. (2008). Seeing dark things: The philosophy of shadows. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
43.
SotirinP. (2011). Becoming-woman. In StivaleC. (Ed.), Gilles Deleuze: Key concepts (pp. 116-130). Montreal, Québec, Canada: McGill-Queen’s University Press.
44.
SpringgayS.TrumanS. E. (2018). Walking methodologies in a more-than-human world: WalkingLab. London, England: Routledge.
45.
UlmerJ. (2017). Posthumanism as research methodology: Inquiry in the Anthropocene. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education, 30, 832-848.
46.
WatsonR. A. (1993). Shadow history in philosophy. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 31, 95-109.
