Emerging ethical challenges in researching vulnerable groups during the COVID-19

Abstract

This paper discusses the lasting impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on research ethics in social sciences by focusing on the concept of vulnerability. We unpack the current conceptualisations of vulnerability and their limitations and argue for the need to reconceptualise vulnerability as multidimensional, consisting of both universal and contextual dimensions, as well as their dynamic interplay. Multidimensional vulnerability is inspired by and relevant to social science research during the pandemic but can also be useful in other contexts such as climate change or conflict. The paper puts forwards several considerations about how this revised concept of vulnerability may be useful when evaluating ethical dimensions of social science research.

Keywords

ethics methodology social sciences and humanities vulnerability covid-19 pandemic

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Allen-Ebrahimian

(2020) China’s domestic violence epidemic. Axios 10. https://www.axios.com/2020/03/07/china-domestic-violence-coronavirus-quarantine

Arora

(2020) Intersectional Vulnerability in Post Disaster Contexts: Lived Experiences of Dalit Women after the Nepal Earthquake, 2015. Disasters 46(2): 329–347. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/disa.12471.

Assa J and Meddeb R (2021). Towards a multidimensional vulnerability index. UNDP Discussion Paper. Available at: https://www.undp.org/publications/towardsmultidimensional-vulnerability-index

Bamford

(2014) Ethical Review of Health Systems Research: Vulnerability and the Need for Philosophy in Research Ethics. The American Journal of Bioethics 14(2): 38–39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2013.868954.

BBC (2021) Covid “hate crimes” against Asian Americans on rise -BBC News. Available at: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-us-canada-56218684

Bloemraad

Menjívar

(2022) Precarious Times, Professional Tensions: The Ethics of Migration Research and the Drive for Scientific Accountability. International Migration Review 56(1): 4–32. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/01979183211014455.

Bortun

Essousi

Pelek

, et al. (2020) Diasporas and initial state responses to the Covid-19 pandemic. Retrieved from https://migrademo.eu/diasporas-and-initial-state-responses-to-the-covid-19-pandemic-3/.

Boyraz

Legros

Tigershtrom

(2020) COVID-19 and traumatic stress: The role of perceived vulnerability, COVID-19-related worries, and social isolation. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 76: 1–9.

Braun

Blok

Loeber

, et al. (2020) COVID-19 and the onlineification of research: kick-starting a dialogue on Responsible online Research and Innovation (RoRI). Journal of Responsible Innovation 7(3): 680–688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2020.1789387.

10.

Buckle

(2021) Research during the COVID-19 pandemic: ethics, gender and precarious work. International Journal of Housing Policy 21(3): 433–450. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19491247.2020.1857907.

11.

Calain

Fiore

Poncin

, et al. (2009) Research ethics and international epidemic response: The case of ebola and marburg hemorrhagic fevers. Public Health Ethics 2(1): 7–29.

12.

Crimmins

(2020) Age-related vulnerability to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Biological, contextual, and policy-related factors. Public Policy & Aging Report 30(4): 142–146.

13.

Danquah

Schotte

Sen

(2020 ) . COVID-19 and employment: Insights from the sub-Saharan African experience. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics 63: 23–30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.35188/UNU-WIDER/WBN/2020-7.

14.

De Larochelambert

Marc

Antero

, et al. (2020) COVID-19 Mortality: A Matter of Vulnerability Among Nations Facing Limited Margins of Adaptation. Frontiers in Public Health 8: 1–11. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.604339.

15.

Doyle

Buckley

(2017) Embracing qualitative research: A visual model for nuanced research ethics oversight. Qualitative Research 17(1): 95–117.

16.

Düvell

Triandafyllidou

Vollmer

(2010) Ethical issues in irregular migration research in Europe. Population, Space and Place 16(3): 227–239.

17.

ECDC (2021) SARS-CoV-2 Transmission and Children. Retrieved from https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/documents/covid-19-references-transmission-13-04-2021.pdf

18.

Evans

Mathur

(2018) The value of online surveys: a look back and a look ahead. Internet Research 28(4): 854–887. https://doi.org/10.1108/IntR-03-2018-0089.

19.

Farrell

Petersen

(2010) The Growth of Internet Research Methods and the Reluctant Sociologist. Sociological Inquiry 80(1): 114–125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-682X.2009.00318.x.

20.

Ferrante

Fearnside

(2020) Protect Indigenous peoples from COVID-19. Science 368(6488): 251–252. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abc0073.

21.

Gallopín

(2006) Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity. Global Environmental Change 16(3): 293–303.

22.

Gaynor

Wilson

(2020) Social vulnerability and equity: The disproportionate impact of COVID-19. Public Administration Review 80(5): 832–838.

23.

Glasius

de Lange

Bartman

, et al. (2017) Research, Ethics and Risk in the Authoritarian Field. Palgrave Macmillan.

24.

Goodin

1986 Protecting the vulnerable: A re-analysis of our social responsibilities. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

25.

Gurwazska, Agatha, Benčin, R. (2015) Ethic assessment in different fields social sciences .Report available at: https://satoriproject.eu/media/2.d-Social-Sciences.pdf

26.

Haggerty

(2004) Ethics creep: Governing social science research in the name of ethics. Qualitative Sociology 27(4): 391–414.

27.

Hine

(2000) Virtual Ethnography. SAGE Publications Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4135/9780857020277

28.

EL-E

Maddrell

(2021) Intolerable intersectional burdens: a COVID-19 research agenda for social and cultural geographies. Social & Cultural Geography 22(1): 1–10. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649365.2020.1837215.

29.

Hooley

Marriott

Wellens

(2012) Dealing with ethical issues in online research. In: What is Online Research?: Using the Internet for Social Science Research. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 25–38https://doi.org/10.5040/9781849665544.ch-003.

30.

Howlett

(2021) Looking at the ‘field’ through a Zoom lens: Methodological reflections on conducting online research during a global pandemic. Qualitative Research 146879412098569: 387–402. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794120985691.

31.

Hugman

Pittaway

Bartolomei

(2011) When “do no harm” is not enough: The ethics of research with refugees and other vulnerable groups. British Journal of Social Work 41(7): 1271–1287.

32.

Human Rights Watch (2020) Covid-Fueling Anti-Asian Racism and Xenophobia Worldwide National Action Plans Needed to Counter Intolerance. Retrieved from https://www.hrw.org/news/2020/05/12/covid-19-fueling-anti-asian-racism-and-xenophobia-worldwide

33.

Hurst

(2008) Vulnerability in research and health care; describing the elephant in the room? Bioethics 22(4): 191–202.

34.

Kara

Khoo

(2020) How the pandemic has transformed research methods and ethics: 3 lessons from 33 rapid responses. Retrieved from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocialsciences/.

35.

Kim

(2018) Nurses’ experiences of care for patients with Middle East respiratory syndrome-coronavirus in South Korea. American Journal of Infection Control 46(7): 781–787.

36.

Kipnis

(2003) Seven Vulnerabilities In The Pediatric Research. Theor Med Bioeth 24(2): 107–120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1024646912928. PMID: 12943266.

37.

Kodish

Bio

Oemcke

, et al. (2019) A qualitative study to understand how Ebola Virus Disease affected nutrition in Sierra Leone—A food value-chain framework for improving future response strategies. PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases 13(9): 1–19.

38.

Kotsila

Kallis

(2019) Biopolitics of public health and immigration in times of crisis: The malaria epidemic in Greece (2009–2014). Geoforum 106: 223–233.

39.

Kottow

(2003) The vulnerable and the susceptible. Bioethics 17(5–6): 460–471.

40.

Kozinets

(2015) Netnography: Redefined. 2nd ed. London: SAGE Publications.

41.

Krause

(2017) Researching forced migration: critical reflections on research ethics during fieldwork, Working paper series no. 123, Refugee Studies Centre, University of Oxford.

42.

Lange

Rogers

Dodds

(2013) Vulnerability in Research Ethics: a Way Forward. Bioethics 27(6): 333–340. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12032.

43.

Levine

Faden

Grady

, et al. (2004) The Limitations of “Vulnerability” as a Protection for Human. The American Journal of Bioethics 4(3): 44–49. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160490497083.

44.

Lincoln

Tierney

(2004) Qualitative research and institutional review boards. Qualitative Inquiry 10(2): 219–234.

45.

Luna

(2019) Identifying and evaluating layers of vulnerability – a way forward. Developing World Bioethics 19(2): 86–95.

46.

MacIntyre

(1999) Dependent Rational Animals Why Human Being Needs the Virtues. Chicago and La Salle, Illinois: Open Court.

47.

Maestripieri

(2021) The COVID-19 Pandemics: why Intersectionality Matters. Frontiers in Sociology 6: 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2021.642662.

48.

Marino

Rivera-Gonzalez

Benadusi

, et al. (2020) COVID-19 and All the Things That Kill Us. Research Ethics in the Time of Pandemic. Practicing Anthropology 42(4)): 36–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17730/0888-4552.42.4.36.

49.

Marino

Faas

(2020) Is vulnerability an outdated concept? After subjects and spaces. Annals of Anthropological Practice 44(1): 33–46. DOI: 10.1111/napa.12132.

50.

Marshall

(2003) Human subjects protections, institutional review boards, and cultural anthropological research. Anthropological Quarterly 76: 269–285.

51.

Marzi

(2021) Remote Ethnography: Doing Anthropology Digitally. Retrieved January 20, 2021, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=evEkKKf5KPU

52.

Matache

Bhabha

(2020) Anti-Roma Racism is Spiraling During COVID-19 Pandemic. Health and Human Rights Journal 21(1): 379–382.

53.

McCann

Matenga

(2020) COVID-19 and Global Inequality. In: Carmody

McCann

G. et. al.

(eds) COVID-19 in the Global South. Bristol University Press , 161–172.

54.

Mealer

Jones

RNJ

(2014) Methodological and ethical issues related to qualitative telephone interviews on sensitive topics. Nurse Researcher 21(4): 32–37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7748/nr2014.03.21.4.32.e1229.

55.

Molina

Borgatti

(2021) Moral bureaucracies and social network research. Social Networks 67: 13–19. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socnet.2019.11.001.

56.

Müller-Funk

(2020) Research with refugees in fragile political contexts: how ethical reflections impact methodological choices. Journal of Refugee Studies 34(2): 2308–2332. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jrs/feaa013.

57.

NHS (2021). Mental Capacity Act. Available online: https://www.nhs.uk/conditions/social-care-and-support-guide/making-decisions-for-someone-else/mental-capacity-act/ (Accessed: 24.01.2023).

58.

O’Neill

(1996) Towards Justice and Virtue Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

59.

Patel

Nielsen

FBH

Badiani

, et al. (2020) Poverty, inequality and COVID-19: the forgotten vulnerable. Public Health 183: 110–111. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.puhe.2020.05.006.

60.

Ranci, C., & Migliavacca, M. (2010). Social vulnerability: A multidimensional analysis, in C. Ranci (Ed.), Social Vulnerability in Europe: The New Configuration of Social Risks (pp. 219-249). London: Palgrave Macmillan

61.

Racine

Bracken-Roche

(2019) Enriching the concept of vulnerability in research ethics: An integrative and functional account. Bioethics 33(1): 19–34. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12471.

62.

Reuters. (2020, July 2). COVID-19 highlights need for companies to protect domestic abuse victims. Available online: https://www.reuters.com/article/women-law-domestic-violenceidUSL8N2E649K

63.

Ries

Thomson

(2020) Bioethics and Universal Vulnerability: Exploring the Ethics and Practices of Research Participation. Medical Law Review 28(2): 293–316. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/medlaw/fwz026.

64.

Rogers

Ballantyne

(2008) Special populations: vulnerability and protection. RECIIS 2(1): 30–40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3395/reciis.v2.Sup1.207en.

65.

Rogers

Mackenzie

Dodds

(2012) Why bioethics needs a concept of vulnerability. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 5(2): 11–38.

66.

Santi

(2015) Vulnerability and Ethics of Social Sciences Research: Current Perspectives. Revista Latinoamericana de Bioética 15(2): 52–73.

67.

Sasser

Leebaw

Ivey

, et al. (2021) Commentary: Intersectional perspectives on COVID-19 exposure. Journal of Exposure Science & Environmental Epidemiology 31(3): 401–403. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41370-021-00336-2.

68.

Schrag

(2011) The case against ethics review in the social sciences. Research Ethics 7(4): 120–131. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1177/174701611100700402.

69.

Sen

Antara

Sen

, et al. (2020) The apparel workers are in the highest vulnerability due to COVID-19: A study on the Bangladesh apparel industry. Asia Pacific Journal of Multid-Isciplinary Research 8(3): 1–7.

70.

Servick

Cho

Couzin-Frankel

, et al. (2020) Coronavirus disruptions reverberate through research. Science 367(6484): 1289–1290. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.367.6484.1289. PMID: 32193300.

71.

Shore

(2008) Audit culture and illiberal governance: Universities and the politics of accountability. Anthropological Theory 8(3): 278–298. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1463499608093815.

72.

Simha

Prasad

Ahmed

, et al. (2020) Effect of gender and clinical-financial vulnerability on mental distress due to COVID-19. Archives of Women’s Mental Health 23(6): 775–777. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00737-020-01097-x.

73.

Smith

(2020) The structural vulnerability of healthcare workers during COVID-19: Observations on the social context of risk and the equitable distribution of resources. Social Science and Medicine 258(113119): 1–4.

74.

Sullivan

Sondag

Rutter

, et al. (2020) Vulnerability in social epistemic networks. International Journal of Philosophical Studies 28(5): 731–753.

75.

Torales

O’Higgins

Castaldelli-Maia

, et al. (2020) The outbreak of COVID-19 coronavirus and its impact on global mental health. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 66(4): 317–320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0020764020915212.

76.

UNESCO (2006) Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights . Available at: https://www.unesco.org/en/legal-affairs/universal-declaration-bioethics-and-human-rights?hub=66535

77.

Usher

Bhullar

Durkin

, et al. (2020) Family violence and COVID-19: Increased vulnerability and reduced options for support. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing 29(4): 549–552. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12735.

78.

Van den Hoonaard

(2019) The vulnerability of vulnerability: Why social science researchers should abandon the doctrine of vulnerability. In: Iphofen

Tolich

(eds) The SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research Ethics. SAGE Publications Ltd., 305–321.

79.

Vickery

(2018) Using an intersectional approach to advance understanding of homeless persons’ vulnerability to disaster. Environmental Sociology 4(1): 136–147. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2017.1408549.

80.

Vindrola-Padros

Chisnall

Cooper

, et al. (2020) Carrying out rapid qualitative research during a pandemic: Emerging lessons from COVID-19. Qualitative Health Research 30(14): 2192–2204.

81.

Walby

Luscombe

(2018) Ethics review and freedom of information requests in qualitative research. Research Ethics 14(4): 1–15. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1747016117750208.

82.

Wagers SM (2020) Domestic violence growing in wake of coronavirus outbreak. The Conversation. Accessed at https://theconversation.com/domestic-violence-growing-inwake-of-coronavirus-outbreak-135598

83.

WHO (2022) Dementia. Retrieved November 15, 2022, from https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dementia

84.

Wiemers

Abrahams

AlFakhri

, et al. (2020) Disparities in vulnerability to complications from COVID-19 arising from disparities in preexisting conditions in the United States. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 69(100553): 1–6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rssm.2020.100553.