Ethnographer as creation: A Whiteheadian interpretation of the ethnographic subject

Abstract

This article examines the dynamic process constituting the researcher-subject in ethnographic fieldwork. Applying the theoretical framework of AN Whitehead AN (1964) The Concept of Nature: The Tarnell Lectures Delivered in Trinity College in 1919. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, Whitehead AN (1929/1985) Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. New York: Free Press, I argue that the ethnographical researching subject is the outcome of fieldwork. I analyse field encounters and illustrate how the ethnographer is constituted differently depending on the field. The field encounter consists of multiple, sometimes overlapping, entities. The entities present in the field encounter may stem from the past illuminating how endurance and change simultaneously operate in the constitution of the ethnographer. Following Whitehead’s thinking, there is no separation between experience and datum. This emphasises how even in the process of knowing the subject and object of research are entwined. This article is a conceptual analysis of selected empirical cases illustrating the emergence of the researcher-subject in fieldwork encounters. I base my analysis on cases from four ethnographic fieldworks I have conducted.

Keywords

ethnography subject AN Whitehead fieldwork participant observation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Barad

(2007) Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Bhavnani

K-K

Phoenix

(1994) Shifting identities shifting racisms. In: Bhavnani

K-K

Phoenix

(eds) Shifting Identities Shifting Racisms: A Feminism and Psychology Reader. London: Sage, 5–18.

Clifford

(1986) Introduction: partial truths. In: Clifford

Marcus

(eds) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1–26.

Coffey

(1999) The Ethnographic Self: Fieldwork and the Representation of Identity. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: SAGE Publications.

Davies

(2000) A Body of Writing. Walnut Creek, CA: Altamira Press.

Denzin

(2017) Critical qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry 23(1): 8–16.

Gemignani

(2011) Between researcher and researched: an introduction to countertransference in qualitative inquiry. Qualitative Inquiry 17(8): 701–708.

Geurts

(2002) Culture and the Senses: Bodily Ways of Knowing in an African Community. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Halewood

(2011) A.N. Whitehead and Social Theory: Tracing a Culture of Thought. London, NY, Delhi: Anthem Press.

10.

Halewood

Michael

(2008) Being a sociologist and becoming a Whiteheadian: toward a concrescent methodology. Theory, Culture & Society 25(4): 31–56.

11.

Hayden

(2009) Displacing the subject: a dialogical understanding of the researching self. Anthropological Theory 9(1): 81–101.

12.

Howes

(2005) Empires of the senses. In: Howes

(ed) Empire of the Senses: The Sensual Culture Reader. Oxford and New York: Berg, 1–24.

13.

Howes

(2019) Multisensory anthropology. Annual Review of Anthropology 48: 17–28.

14.

Ingold

Simonetti

(2022) Introducing solid fluids. Theory, Culture & Society 39(2): 3–29.

15.

Katz

(2019) On becoming an ethnographer. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 48(1): 16–50.

16.

Latour

(2011) Foreword: what is given in experience? In: Stengers I (2011) Thinking with Whitehead: A Free and Wild Creation of Concepts. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press, ix–xv.

17.

Low

KEY

(2015) The sensuous city: sensory methodologies in urban ethnographic research. Ethnography 16(3): 295–312.

18.

Luvaas

(2019) Unbecoming: the aftereffects of autoethnography. Ethnography 20(2): 245–262.

19.

Marcus

(2009) Notes toward an ethnographic memoir of supervising graduate research through anthropology’s decades of transformation. In: Faubion

Marcus

(eds) Fieldwork is Not What it Used to Be: Learning Anthropology’s Method in a Time of Transition. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press, 1–34.

20.

Michael

(2016) Notes towards a speculative methodology of everyday life. Qualitative Research 16(6): 646–660.

21.

Paju

(2018) Plugging in through clothing: How children’s clothes influence perception and affective practices in day care. The Sociological Review 66(3): 527–541.

22.

Paju

(2020) Futures in action: Embodied or empty futures in youth activation workshops. Time & Society 29(3): 637–658.

23.

Paju

Näre

Merikoski

Home and homemaking during refugee journeys. In: Boccagni

(ed). Handbook of home and migration. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, Submitted for publication.

24.

Pink

(2004) Home Truths: Gender, Domestic Objects and Everyday Life. Oxford: Berg.

25.

Pink

(2009) Doing Sensory Ethnography. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington, DC: SAGE.

26.

Reyes

(2020) Ethnographic toolkit: strategic positionality and researchers’ visible and invisible tools in field research. Ethnography 21(2): 220–240.

27.

Roberts

(2014) From things to events: whitehead and the materiality of process. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 32(6): 968–983.

28.

Stengers

(2011) Thinking with Whitehead: A Free and Wild Creation of Concepts. Cambridge and London: Harvard University Press.

29.

Tamboukou

(2016) Feeling narrative in the archive: the question of serendipity. Qualitative Research 16(2): 151–166.

30.

Taylor

(1989) The Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

31.

Whitehead

(1964) The Concept of Nature: The Tarnell Lectures Delivered in Trinity College in 1919. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

32.

Whitehead

(1929/1985) Process and Reality: An Essay in Cosmology. New York: Free Press.