This article discusses collaborations among participants in research on Adivasi (indigenous) women in Odisha, India. The focus is on the researcher–gatekeeper dialogue by unravelling spaces of inclusion and exclusion among partners in the research. We give voice to one particular gatekeeper, in an attempt to understand the power gatekeepers and researchers have and can exercise both together and within their own domains. The authors conclude that regardless of how much effort is made to create a level playing field, inequality continues to exist among participants. Hence, it becomes important to understand the role and power of each participant in a research process as well as their contribution to creating spaces of inclusion.
AubertASolerM (2006) Dialogism: the dialogic turn in social sciences. In: KincheloeJHormR (eds) The Praeger Handbook of Education and Psychology. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press, 521–29.
3.
BeebeejaunYDuroseCReesJRichardsonJRichardsonL (2014) ‘Beyond text’: exploring ethos and method in co-producing research with communities. Community Development (1): 37–53.
4.
BradleyM (2007) North–South research partnerships: Challenges, responses and trends – A literature review and annotated bibliography. IDRC Working Paper 1. Ottawa, Canada: International Development Research Centre.
5.
BroadheadRSRistR (1976) Gatekeepers and the social control of social research. Social Problems23(3): 325–36.
6.
BrunCLundR (2010) Real-time research: decolonising research practices or just another spectacle of researcher–practitioner collaboration?Development in Practice20(7): 812–26.
7.
GallagharK (2008) The Methodological Dilemma: Creative, Critical and Collaborative Approaches to Qualitative Research. London: Routledge.
8.
GershonWS (ed.) (2009) The Collaborative Turn: Working Together in Qualitative Research. Rotterdam: Sense Publications.
9.
GingrichLG (2008) Social exclusion and double jeopardy: the management of lone mothers in the market-state social field. Social Policy and Administration42(4): 379–95.
10.
GomezALPuigvertLFlechaR (2011) Critical communicative methodology: informing real social transformation through research. Qualitative Inquiry17(3): 235–45.
11.
HuxhamCVangenS (2013) Managing to Collaborate: The Theory and Practice of Collaborative Advantage. New York: Routledge.
12.
LundRKuskabeKPandaSMWangY (2013) Gender, Mobilities and Livelihood Trans-formation: Comparing Indigenous People in China, India and Laos. London: Routledge.
13.
LundRPandaSM (2015) Struggling bodies and spaces of resistance – Adivasi women activists in Odisha, India. In: LundRDoneysPRessurreccionB (eds) Gendered Entanglement: Revisiting Gender in Rapidly Changing Asia. Copenhagen: NIAS, 147–76.
14.
MohantyCT (2003) Feminism Without Borders. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
15.
NagarR (2014) Muddying Waters. Coauthoring Feminisms across Scholarship and Activism: Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
16.
PadelFDasS (2010) Out of This Earth: East India Adivasis and the Aluminium Cartel. Delhi: Orient Swan.
17.
PhillipsLJKristiansenMGunnarssonEVehvilainenM (eds) (2013) Knowledge and Power in Collaborative Research: A Reflexive Approach. London: Routledge.
18.
PorathA (2010) Collaborative Research in Management (Inside Out). Thousand Oaks, CA: Response Books (Sage).
19.
WritersSangrinNagarR (2006) Playing with Fire: Feminist Thought and Activism through Seven Lives in India. Minneapolis: University Minnesota Press.
