Abstract
Drawing on a study about women secondary school teachers’ perceptions of the factors affecting their career decisions, I consider in this article some of the issues I faced as a researcher in using life history interviews, as well as the strengths afforded by this approach for research with a social justice agenda. I argue that researcher involvement and bias are inevitable aspects of life history research, and that these need to be managed to the benefit rather than the detriment of the study. I describe some of the strategies I used to code, organize and interpret the data. Life history offers a number of strengths: it offers scope for exploring subjective realities; it allows narrators to reflect as they speak, which for some can be a transformative experience; and it affords rich insights into the reasons behind the decisions people make that would not be possible via more structured approaches.
Keywords
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
