Drawing upon research conducted with Black American middle-class youth in a secondary school, this article highlights the use of participant photography with Black male youth. Participant photography is a visual method that places the power of photo documentation in the hands of research subjects, empowering them to document and reflect on social issues and cultural phenomena important to them. This article highlights the significance of the method when exploring the understudied lives of Black middle-class males, ethical considerations of using visual methods with youth populations, as well as the benefits and dilemmas of engaging Black male youth in participant photography. Visual and narrative data produced from the participant photography project are used to highlight the benefits and ethical dilemmas of the method when working with Black male middle-class youth.
Abu-LughodL (1990) Can there be a feminist ethnography?Women & Performance5: 1–27.
2.
Abu-LughodL (1991) Writing against culture. In: FoxRG (ed) Recapturing Anthropology: Working in the Present. Sante Fe, NM: School of American Research Press, 137–162.
3.
AscherCBranch-SmithE (2005) Precarious space: majority black suburbs and their public schools. Teachers College Record107: 1956–1973.
4.
AllenQ (2010) Racial microaggressions: The schooling experiences of Black middle-class males in Arizona’s secondary schools. Journal of African American Males in Education1: 125–143.
5.
CapelloM (2005) Photo interviews: eliciting data through conversations with children. Field Methods17: 170–182.
6.
CarlsonEDEngebretsonJChamberlainRM (2006) Photovoice as a social process of critical consciousness. Qualitative Health Research16: 836–852.
7.
ClarkA (2006) Anonymising research data. Real Life MethodsWorking Paper [Online]. Available at: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/480/
8.
ClarkCD (1999) The autodriven interview: a photographic viewfinder into children’s experiences. Visual Sociology14: 39–50.
9.
Clarke-IbañezM (2004) Framing the social world with photo-elicitation interviews. American Behavioral Scientist47: 1507–1524.
10.
ClarkLZimmerL (2001) What we learned from a photographic component in a study of Latino children’s health. Field Methods13: 303–328.
11.
CliffordJ (1986) Partial truths. In: CliffordJMarcusG (eds) Writing Culture. Santa Fe, NM: School of American Research, 1–26.
12.
CliffordJ (1988) The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
13.
CloverDE (2006) Out of the dark room: participatory photography as a critical, imaginative, and public aesthetic practice of transformative education. Journal of Transformative Education4: 275–290.
14.
CollierJ (1967) Visual Anthropology: Photography as Research Method. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
15.
CollierJCollierM (1986) Visual Anthropology: Photography as Research Method. Albuquerque, NM: University of New Mexico Press.
16.
CollinsPH (1990) Comment on Hekman’s ‘truth and method: feminist standpoint theory revisited’: where’s the power?Signs22: 375–381.
17.
CollinsPH (2004) Black Sexual Politics: African-Americans, Gender and the New Racism. New York: Routledge.
18.
CooperFR (2006) Against bipolar black masculinity: intersectionality, assimilation, identity performance, and hierarchy. UC Davis Law Review39: 853–904.
19.
CousinsLH (1999) ‘Playing between classes’: America’s troubles with class, race, and gender in a black high school and community. Anthropology & Education Quarterly30: 294–316.
20.
DanielsD (2003) Learning about community leadership: fusing methodology and pedagogy to learn about the lives of settlement women. Adult Education Quarterly53: 189–206.
21.
DavisJE (2001) Black boys at school: negotiating masculinities and race. In: MajorsR (ed) Educating Our Black Children. New York: RoutledgeFalmer, 169–180.
22.
DonoghueD (2007) ‘James always hangs out here’: making space for place in studying masculinities at school. Visual Studies22: 62–73.
23.
EntmanR (1990) Modern racism and the image of blacks. Critical Studies in Mass Communication332–345.
24.
EpsteinIStevensBMckeeverP. (2006) Photo elicitation interview (pei): using photos to elicit children’s perspectives. International Journal of Qualitative Methods5: 1–11.
25.
EricksonF (1986) Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In: WittrockMC (ed) Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd edn). Macmillan Reference Books.
26.
FerberAL (2007) The construction of black masculinity: white supremacy now and then. Journal of Sport & Social Issues31: 11–24.
27.
FergusonRF (2001) A diagnostic analysis of black-white GPA disparities in Shaker heights, Ohio. In: RavitchD (ed) Brookings Papers on Education Policy. Washington, DC: Brookings, 347–414.
28.
FoucaultM (1979) On governmentality. Ideology and Consciousness6: 5–22.
29.
FreireP (1970) Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Continuum International Publishing Group.
30.
FujiokaY (1999) Television portrayals and African-American stereotypes: examination of television effects when direct contact is lacking. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly76: 52–75.
31.
GonzalezD (2003) Young lives transformed, guided by a camera lens. The New York TimesMay7.
32.
HallinanMT (2001) Sociological perspectives on black-white inequalities in American schooling. Sociology of Education74: 50–70.
33.
HallRE (1993) Clowns, buffoons, and gladiators: media portrayals of African American men. The Journal of Men’s Studies1: 239–251.
34.
HallSCritcherCJeffersonT. (1978) Policing the crisis: Mugging, the state and law and order. London: Macmillan.
35.
HarperD (1986) Meaning and work: a study in photo elicitation. Current Sociology34: 24–46.
HollidayR (2000) We’ve been framed: visualizing methodology. Sociological Review48: 503–521.
38.
hooksb (2003) We Real Cool: Black men and Masculinity. New York: Routledge.
39.
HorvatEMAntonioAL (1999) ‘Hey, those shoes are out of uniform’: black girls in an elite high school and the importance of habitus. Anthropology & Education Quarterly30: 317–342.
40.
JoanouJP (2009) The bad and the ugly: ethical concerns in participatory photographic methods with children living and working on the streets of Lima, Peru. Visual Studies24: 214–223.
41.
KarlssonJ (2001) Doing visual research with school learners in South Africa. Visual Sociology16: 23–38.
42.
KillonCWangC (2000) Linking African American mothers across life stage and station through photovoice. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved11: 310–325.
43.
LarkinJ (1994) Walking through walls: the sexual harassment of high school girls. Gender and Education6: 263.
44.
MajorsRBillsonJM (1992) Cool Pose: The Dilemmas of Black Manhood in America. New York: Touchstone.
45.
MarkwellK (2000) Photo-documentation and analyses as research strategies in human geography. Australian Geographical Studies38: 91–98.
46.
MarriottD (1996) Reading black masculinities: In: Mac an GhaillM (ed) Understanding Masculinities. Buckingham: Open University, 185–201.
47.
MeoAI (2010) Picturing students’ habitus: the advantages and limitations of photo-elicitation interviewing in a qualitative study in the city of Buenos Aires. International Journal of Qualitative Studies9: 149–171.
48.
MillerGHappellB (2006) Talking about hope: the use of participant photography. Issues in Mental Health Nursing27: 1051–1065.
49.
MitchellCStuartJMoletsaneR. (2006) ‘Why we don’t go to school on Fridays’: on youth participation through photo voice in Rural Kwazulu-Natal. McGill Journal of Education41: 267–282.
50.
MossT (1999) Photovoice. Children First3: 28–29.
51.
OgbuJ (2003) Black American students in an affluent suburb. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
52.
OrnelasIJAmellJTranAN. (2009) Understanding African American men’s perceptions of racism, male gender socialization, and social capital through photovoice. Qualitative Health Research19: 552–565.
53.
PackardJ (2008) ‘I’m gonna show you what it’s really like out here’: the power and limitation of participatory visual methods. Visual Studies23: 63–77.
54.
Pattillo-McCoyM (1999) Black Picket Fences: Privilege and Peril among the Black Middle Class. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
55.
PrinsE (2010) Participatory photography: a tool for empowerment or surveillance?Action Research8: 426–443.
56.
RoachR (2001) Where are all the black men on campus?Black Issues in Higher Education18: 18–21.
57.
SewellT (1997) Black Masculinities and Schooling. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books.
58.
SinghalARattine-FlahertyE (2006) Pencils and photos as tools of communicative research and praxis: analyzing Minga Peru’s quest for social justice in the Amazon. International Communication Gazette68: 313–330.
59.
Special Report (2003) Confronting a widening racial gap on the SAT. Journal of Blacks in Higher Education41: 84–89.
60.
StoetzlerMYuval-DavisN (2002) Standpoint theory, situated knowledge and the situated imagination. Feminist Theory3: 315–333.
61.
StrackRWMagillCMcdonaghK (2004) Engaging youth through photovoice. Health Promotion Practice5: 49–58.
62.
TinklerP (2008) A fragmented picture: reflections on the photographic practices of young people. Visual Studies23: 255–266.
63.
WangC (2003) Using photovoice as a participatory assessment and issue selection tool: a case study with homeless in Ann Arbor. In: MinklerMWallersteinN (eds) Community-Based Participatory Health Research. San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass, 179–195.
64.
WangCBurrisMA (1994) Empowerment through photo novella: portraits of participation. Health Education Quarterly21: 171–186.
65.
WangCBurrisMA (1997) Photovoice: concept, methodology, and use for participatory needs assessment. Health Education & Behavior24: 369–387.
66.
WangCRedwood-JonesY (2001) Photovoice ethics: perspectives from flint photovoice. Health Education & Behavior28: 560–572.
67.
WarnerM (ed) (1993) Fear of A Queer Planet: Queer Politics and Social Theory. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota.
68.
WarrenS (2005) Photography and voice in critical qualitative management research. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal18: 861–862.
