The article is based on methodological reflections and recollections from two qualitative cross-national research projects, one of them comparing Finland and Scotland, and the other one Scotland and Spain. One of them was a case-oriented study of local regeneration strategies in two cities, while the other one used an ethnographic approach for the study of local practices on maternity and child healthcare services. The article is based on the authors’ dialogue and it contributes to the discussion about the value of a qualitative approach in cross-national comparisons and its place in the field of comparative research. It points at its advantages in enabling the analysis of societies and their specific features from inside to recognize cultural and social contexts, but it also draws attention to some specific problems and challenges concerning qualitative cross-national research by providing concrete examples from the two pieces of research.
AgarMH (1980) The Professional Stranger. An Informal Introduction to Ethnography. New York: Academic Press.
2.
AnttonenA (2005) Vertailut ja sosiaalipolitiikan uusi suunta [New trends in social policy research: comparative approach to social policy]. Janus. The Finnish Journal of Social Policy and Social Work Research13(3): 268–288.
3.
BaistowK (2000) Cross-national research: what can we learn from inter-country comparisons?Social Work in Europe7(3): 8–13.
4.
BergBL (1998) Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences (3rd Edition). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
5.
CarlingADuncanSEdwardsR (eds) (2002) Analyzing Families. Morality and Rationality in Policy and Practice. London: Routledge.
6.
Engender (1994) Gender Audit 1994. Edinburgh: The Scottish Office.
7.
Engender (1996) Gender Audit 1996. Edinburgh: The Scottish Office.
8.
GómezMV (1998a) Reflective images: the case of urban regeneration in Glasgow and Bilbao. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research22(1): 106–121.
9.
GómezMV (1998b) Glasgow and Bilbao: a comparison of urban regeneration strategies. Unpublished PhD thesis, Department of Applied Social Science, University of Stirling. Available at: https://dspace.stir.ac.uk/dspace/handle/1893/2266
10.
GómezMV (2008) La metamorfosis de la ciudad industrial. Glasgow y Bilbao: dos ciudades con un mismo recorrido. Madrid: Talasa.
11.
GordonTLahelmaE (2004) Vertaileva ja poikkikulttuurinen tutkimus [Comparative and cross-cultural research]. In: AlapuroRArminenI (eds) Vertailevan tutkimuksen ulottuvuuksia. Helsinki: WSOY, 97–110.
12.
GordonTHollandJLahelmaETolonenT (2005) Gazing with intent: ethnographic practice in classrooms. Qualitative Research5(1): 113–131.
13.
HantraisL (1999) Contextualization in cross-national comparative research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology2(2): 93–108.
14.
HantraisL (2009) International Comparative Research: Theory, Methods and Practice. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan.
15.
HetheringtonR (1998) Issues in European child protection research. European Journal of Social Work1(1): 71–82.
16.
HoldsworthC (2004) Family support during the transition out of the parental home in Britain, Spain and Norway. Sociology38(5): 909–926.
17.
HolsteinJAGubriumJF (2004) The active interview. In: SilvermanD (ed.) Qualitative Research, Theory, Method and Practice (2nd Edition). London: Sage, 140–161.
18.
KrögerT (ed.) (2004) New kinds of families, new kinds of social care: families, work and social care in Europe. A qualitative study of care arrangements in Finland, France, Italy, Portugal and the UK. SOCCARE Project, European Commission 5th Framework Programme. Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/research/social-sciences/project-reports2004_en.html
19.
KuronenM (1999) The social organisation of motherhood: advice giving in maternity and child health care in Scotland and Finland. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Stirling. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/2302
20.
KuronenM (2001) Motherhood in family context – comparing professional practice in maternity and child health care in Finland and Scotland. In: SöderlingI (ed.) Yearbook of Population Research in Finland XXXVI 2000. Helsinki: The Population Research Institute, 5–22.
21.
LewisJ (1997) Lone mothers: the British case. In: LewisJ (ed.) Lone Mothers in European Welfare Regimes: Shifting Policy Logics. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, 50–74.
22.
MabbettDBoldersonH (1999) Theories and methods in comparative social policy. In: ClasenJ (ed.) Comparative Social Policy: Concepts, Theories and Methods. Oxford: Blackwell, 34–56.
23.
McCroneD (2005) Cultural capital in an understated nation: the case of Scotland. The British Journal of Sociology56(1): 65–82.
24.
MannKRoseneilS (1994) Some mothers do ‘ave ‘em: backlash and the gender politics of the underclass debate. Journal of Gender Studies3(3): 317–331.
25.
MasonJ (2006) Mixing methods in a qualitatively driven way. Qualitative Research6(1): 9–25.
26.
MatthiesA-LTurunenPAlbersSBoeckTNärhiK (2000) An eco-social approach to tackling social exclusion in European cities: a new comparative research project in progress. European Journal of Social Work3(1): 43–52.
27.
MayV (2004) Meanings of lone motherhood within a broader family context. The Sociological Review52(3): 390–403.
28.
MeeuwisseASwärdH (2007) Cross-national comparisons of social work – a question of initial assumptions and levels of analysis. European Journal of Social Work10(4): 481–496.
29.
MillerG (1997) Introduction: context and method in qualitative research. In: MillerGDingwallR (eds) Context & Method in Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
30.
MillsMVan de BuntGDe BruijnJ (2006) Comparative research persistent problems and promising solutions. International Sociology21(5): 619–631.
31.
ØyenE (1990) The imperfection of comparisons. In: ØyenE (ed.) Comparative Methodology: Theory and Practice in International Social Research. London: Sage.
32.
QuilgarsDElsingaMJonesAToussaintJRuonavaaraHNaumanenP (2009) Inside qualitative, cross-national research: making methods transparent in a EU housing study. International Journal of Social Research Methodology12(1): 19–31.
33.
RaginC (1987) The Comparative Method. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
34.
RihouxB (2006) Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and related systematic comparative methods: recent advances and remaining challenges for social science research. International Sociology21(5): 679–706.
35.
SmithDE (1988) The Everyday World as Problematic: A Feminist Sociology. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
36.
SmithDE (2005) Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press.
37.
StakeRE (1994) Case studies. In: DenzinNKLincolnYS (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research. London: Sage, 236–247.
38.
StrongPM (1988) Minor courtesies and macro structures. In: DrewPWoottonA (eds) Erving Goffman: Exploring the Interaction Order. Oxford: Polity, 228–249.
39.
TaberN (2010) Institutional ethnography, autoethnography, and narrative: an argument for incorporating multiple methodologies. Qualitative Research10(1): 5–25.
