Mixed methods principles can support and advance cross-cultural research. This article provides different ways for researchers to conceptualize culture and summarizes the Synergistic Participatory Mixed Methods Quality Model (SPMMQM): Cycle of Research. The SPMMQM summarizes several mixed methods principles and philosophical foundations that support cross-cultural work, including the application of etic and emic concepts drawn from ethnography. This article also introduces the idea of using joint displays within the SPMMQM and cites several primary resources readers can consult should they wish to learn more about cross-culture mixed methods research.
BrantlingerE.JiminezR.KlingnerJ.PugachM.RichardsonV. (2005). Qualitative studies in special education. Exceptional Children, 71(2), 195–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440290507100205
2.
BrewerJ. D. (2000). Ethnography. McGraw-Hill Education.
3.
ChilisaB.TshekoG. N. (2014). Mixed methods in indigenous research: Building relationships for sustainable intervention outcomes. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(3), 222–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814527878
4.
ColeM. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Harvard University Press.
CreswellJ. W.Plano ClarkV. L. (2018). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (3rd ed.). Sage.
7.
CreswellJ. W.TashakkoriA. (2007). Editorial: Differing perspectives on mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(4), 303–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807306132
8.
DraugalisJ. R.CoonsS. J.PlazaC. M. (2008). Best practices for survey research reports: A synopsis for authors and reviewers. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 72(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5688/aj720111
9.
FettermanD. M. (2010). Ethnography: Step-by-step (4th ed.). Sage.
10.
FettersM. D.CurryL. A.CreswellJ. W. (2013). Achieving integration in mixed methods designs—principles and practices. Health Services Research, 48(6pt2), 2134–2156. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6773.12117
11.
FettersM. D.FreshwaterD. (2015). The 1 + 1 = 3 integration challenge. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 9(2), 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815581222
12.
GevenK.SkopekJ.TriventiM. (2018). How to increase PhD completion rates? An impact evaluation of two reforms in a selective graduate school, 1976–2012. Research in Higher Education, 59(5), 529–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11162-017-9481-z
13.
GreenC. A.DuanN.GibbonsR. D.HoagwoodK. E.PalinkasL. A.WisdomJ. P. (2015). Approaches to mixed methods dissemination and implementation research: Methods, strengths, caveats, and opportunities. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 508–523. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10488-014-0552-6
14.
GreeneJ. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. Jossey Bass.
15.
GuettermanT. C.FettersM. D. (2022). Data visualization in the context of integrated analyses. In HitchcockJ. H.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook for advancing integration in mixed methods research (pp. 301–323). Routledge.
16.
GuettermanT. C.FettersM. D.CreswellJ. W. (2015). Integrating quantitative and qualitative results in health science mixed methods research through joint displays. The Annals of Family Medicine, 13(6), 554–561. https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.1865
17.
HitchcockJ. H. (2023). Emergent design thinking, rigorous research, and perseverance: Comments from a Keynote Address. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 35(2), 4. https://doi.org/10.25035/mwer.35.02.04
18.
HitchcockJ. H.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2020). Developing mixed methods crossover analysis approaches. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 14(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689819841782
19.
HitchcockJ. H.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (2022). The Routledge handbook for advancing integration in mixed methods research. Routledge.
20.
HitchcockJ. H.OnwuegbuzieA. J.Application of mixed methods for international and cross-cultural research. In NastasiB. K. (Ed.), School psychology in the global context handbook. Springer. (in press).
21.
HoweK. R. (1988). Against the quantitative-qualitative incompatibility thesis or dogmas die hard. Educational Researcher, 17(8), 10–16. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X017008010
22.
JohnsonR. B. (2017). Dialectical pluralism: A metaparadigm whose time has come. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 11(2), 156–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689815607692
23.
JohnsonR. B. (2024). Dialectical pluralism and integration in mixed methods research. In ShanY. (Ed.), Philosophical foundations of mixed methods research (pp. 100–126). Taylor & Francis
24.
JohnsonR. B.RussoF.SchoonenboomJ. (2019). Causation in mixed methods research: The meeting of philosophy, science, and practice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(2), 143–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689817719610
25.
JohnsonR. B.SchoonenboomJ. (2016). Adding qualitative and mixed methods research to health intervention studies: Interacting with differences. Qualitative Health Research, 26(5), 587–602. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315617479
26.
KimK. H. (2014). Community-involved learning to expand possibilities for vulnerable children: A critical communicative, sen’s capability, and action research approach. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 8(3), 308–316. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814527877
27.
LeCompteM. D.SchensulJ. J. (2012). Analysis and interpretation of ethnographic data: A mixed methods approach (Ethnographer's Toolkit, Book 5 (2nd ed.). AltaMira Press.
28.
LuceroJ.WallersteinN.DuranB.AlegriaM.Greene-MotonE.IsraelB.KastelicS.MagaratiM.OetzelJ.PearsonC.SchulzA.VillegasM.White HatE. R. (2018). Development of a mixed methods investigation of process and outcomes of community-based participatory research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 12(1), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816633309
29.
MaxwellJ. A. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33(2), 3–11. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X033002003
30.
MaxwellJ. A. (2021). The importance of qualitative research for investigating causation. Qualitative Psychology, 8(3), 378–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/qup0000219
31.
MertensD. M. (2007). Transformative Paradigm: Mixed methods and social justice. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(3), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689807302811
32.
MorganD. (2022). Paradigms in mixed methods research. In HitchcockJ. H.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook for advancing integration in mixed methods research (pp. 97–112). Routledge.
33.
NastasiB. K. (2022). Designing integrated ethnographic approaches. In HitchcockJ. H.OnwuegbuzieA. J. (Eds.), The Routledge handbook for advancing integration in mixed methods research (pp. 113–123). Routledge.
34.
NastasiB. K.HitchcockJ. H. (2016). Mixed methods research and culture-specific interventions: Program design and evaluation. The New Mixed Methods Research Series). Sage.
35.
NastasiB. K.HitchcockJ. H.BurkholderG.SarkarS.VarjasK.JayasenaA. (2007). Mixed methods in intervention research: Theory to adaptation. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298181
36.
NastasiB. K.HitchcockJ. H.GutierrezR.OshrinS. (2022). Promoting quality of mixed methods consultation research: A synergistic participatory framework. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 32(1), 22–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/10474412.2021.1887743
37.
NastasiB. K.HitchcockJ. H.VarjasK.JayasenaA.SarkarS.MooreR. B.BurdenF. F.AlbrechtL. (2010). School-based stress and coping program for adolescents in Sri Lanka: Using mixed methods to facilitate culture-specific programming. In CollinsK. M. T.OnwuegbuzieA. J.JiaoQ. G. (Eds.), Toward a broader understanding of stress and coping: Mixed methods approaches (pp. 305–342). Information Age Publishing.
38.
NastasiB. K.SchensulJ. J.SchensulS. L.Mekki-BerradaA.PeltoB.MaitraS.VermaR. K.SaggurtiN. (2014). A model for translating ethnography and theory into culturally constructed clinical practice. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry, 39(1), 92–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11013-014-9404-9
39.
NastasiB. K.SchensulS. L. (2005). Contributions of qualitative research to the validity of intervention research. Journal of School Psychology, 42(3), 177–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsp.2005.04.003
40.
NastasiB. K.VarjasK.BernsteinR.JayasenaA. (2000). Conducting participatory culture-specific consultation: A global perspective on multicultural consultation. School Psychology Review, 29(3), 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2000.12086024
41.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.FrelsR. (2016). Seven steps to a comprehensive literature review: A multimodal and cultural approach. Sage
PapayiannisS.Anastassiou-HadjicharalambousX. (2011). Cross-cultural studies. In GoldsteinS.NaglieriJ. A. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of child behavior and development. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-79061-9_738
44.
PattonM. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage.
45.
PeltoP. J. (2017). Mixed Methods in ethnographic research: Historical perspectives. Routledge.
46.
SchensulJ. J. (2016). Ethnography in action: A mixed methods approach (Ethnographer's Toolkit (Book 7, 2nd ed.). AltaMira Press.
47.
SchensulJ. J.LeCompteM. D. (2016). The ethnographer’s toolkit (2nd). AltaMira Press.
48.
ShadishW. R.CookT.CampbellD. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.
49.
UngarM.LiebenbergL. (2011). Assessing resilience across cultures using mixed methods: Construction of the child and youth resilience measure. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 5(2), 126–149. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811400607
50.
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2001). Mental health: Culture, race and ethnicity a supplement to mental health: A report of the surgeon general. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services. National Institutes of Health, National Institutes of Mental Health.
