There has been a significant increase in funding for health programmes in development over the last two decades, partly due to the formation of public–private partnerships. This article examines the impact of public–private partnerships from the perspective of women’s health, asks whether the current culture of funding has led to an increased instrumentalism in women’s health programming and what effects this has on how women’s health is addressed at the level of practice. The article is based on research carried out with UK-based non-governmental organisations (NGOs), and its conclusions raise further challenges for improving women’s health policies and programmes in development.
BirnA-E (2014) Philanthrocapitalism past and present: The Rockefeller Foundation, the Gates Foundation and the setting(s) of the international/global health agenda. Hypothesis12(1): 1–27, e6.
BrymanA (2008) Social Research Methods, 3rd edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4.
BuseKHarmerA (2007) Seven habits of highly effective global public – Private health partnerships: Practice and potential. Social Science & Medicine64: 259–271.
5.
BuseKTanakaS (2011) Global Public-Private Health Partnerships: Lessons learned from ten years of experience and evaluation. International Dental Journal61(Suppl. 2): 2–10.
6.
BuseKWaltG (2000) Global Public-Private Partnerships: Part II – What are the health issues for global governance?Bulletin of World Health Organisation78(5): 699–709.
7.
BuseKDragerNHeinW. (2009) Global health governance: The emerging agenda. In: BuseKHeinWDragerN (eds) Making Sense of Global Health Governance. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.1–28.
8.
CáceresCAmayaASandovalC. (2013) A critical analysis of Peru’s HIV grant proposals to the global fund. Global Public Health8(10): 1123–1137.
9.
Development Studies Association (DSA) Study Group on Gender Policy and Practice (2015) Is there still space for gender equality in the current gender narratives of development?Report of Study group meeting, Holloway Resource Centre, London, 27January. Available at: http://www.devstud.org.uk/studygroups/gender_and_practice_study_group-33.html (accessed 20 May 2015).
10.
EsserDBenchK (2011) Does global health funding respond to recipients’ needs? Comparing public and private donors’ allocations. World Development39(8): 1271–1280.
11.
FarahIRizviS (2007) Public-private partnerships: Implications for primary schooling in Pakistan. Social Policy Administration41(4): 339–354.
12.
FreedmanL (2005) Achieving the MDGs: Health systems as core social institutions. Development48(1): 19–24.
13.
FreedmanLPWaldmanRJDe PinhoH. (2005) Transforming health systems to improve the lives of women and children. The Lancet365: 997–1000.
14.
Fukuda-ParrS (2012) Should global goal setting continue, and how, in the post-2015 era? DESA Working Paper no. 117, ST/ESA/2012/DWP/117. Available at: http://www.un.org/esa/desa/papers/2012/wp117_2012.pdf (accessed 30 October 2013).
GhanotakisEMayhewSWattsC (2009) Tackling HIV and gender-based violence in South Africa: How has PEPFAR responded and what are the implications for implementing organizations?Health Policy and Planning24: 357–366.
17.
GideonJ (2014) Gender, Globalisation and Health in a Latin American Context. New York; Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
18.
GrecoGPowell-JacksonTBorghiJ. (2008) Countdown to 2015: Assessment of donor assistance to maternal, newborn, and child health between 2003 and 2006. The Lancet371: 1268–1275.
19.
HanefeldJ (2010) The impact of global health initiatives at national and sub-national level a policy analysis of their role in implementation processes of antiretroviral treatment (ART) roll-out in Zambia and South Africa. AIDSCare22(Suppl. 1): 93–102.
HarmerASpicerNAleshkinaJ. (2012) Has global fund support for civil society advocacy in the former Soviet Union established meaningful engagement or ‘A lot of jabber about nothing’?Health Policy and Planning. Epub ahead of print 4July. DOI: 10.1093/heapol/czs060.
22.
HawkesCBuseK (2011) Public health sector and food industry interaction: It’s time to clarify the term ‘partnership’ and be honest about underlying interests. European Journal of Public Health21(4): 400–403.
23.
HawkesSBuseK (2013) Gender and global health: Evidence, policy and inconvenient truths. The Lancet381: 1783–1787.
24.
HsuJBermanPMillsA (2013) Reproductive health priorities: Evidence from a resource tracking analysis of official development assistance in 2009 and 2010. The Lancet381: 1772–1782.
25.
InhornMC (2006) Defining women’s health: A dozen messages from more than 150 ethnographies. Medical Anthropology Quarterly20(3): 345–378.
26.
JehanKSidneyKSmithH. (2012) Improving access to maternity services: An overview of cash transfer and voucher schemes in South Asia. Reproductive Health Matters20(39): 142–154.
27.
KanyaLObareFWarrenC. (2014) Population safe motherhood voucher programme coverage of health facility deliveries among poor women in South-western Uganda. Health Policy and Planning29: i4–i11.
28.
KapilashramiAMcPakeB (2013) Transforming governance or reinforcing hierarchies and competition: Examining the public and hidden transcripts of the global fund and HIV in India. Health Policy and Planning28: 626–635.
29.
KoivusaloMMackintoshM (2011) Commercial influence and global nongovernmental public action in health and pharmaceutical policies. International Journal of Health Services41(3): 539–563.
30.
LoM (2008) Public-private partnerships for maternal health in Africa: Challenges and prospects. Marriage and Family Review44(2–3): 214–237.
31.
McCoyDChandSSridharD (2009) Global health funding: How much, where it comes from and where it goes. Health Policy and Planning24: 407–417.
32.
MackintoshMTibandebageP (2006) Gender and health sector reform: Analytical perspectives on African experience. In: RazaviSHassimS (eds) Gender and Social Policy in a Global Context: Uncovering the Gendered Structure of ‘The Social’. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 237–257.
33.
MatksuokaSObaraHNagaiM. (2014) Performance based financing with GAVI health system strengthening funding in rural Cambodia: A brief assessment of the impact. Health Policy and Planning29(4): 456–465.
34.
MayhewS (2002) Donor dealings: The impact of international donor aid on sexual and reproductive health services. International Family Planning Perspectives28(4): 220–224.
35.
MoranMStevensonM (2013) Illumination and innovation: What philanthropic foundations bring to global health governance. Global Society27(2): 117–137.
36.
MosseD (2005) Cultivating Development: An Ethnography of Aid Policy and Practice. London; New York: Pluto Press.
37.
ParkhurstJOVulimiriM (2013) Cervical cancer and the global health agenda: Insights from multiple policy-analysis frameworks. Global Public Health8(10): 1093–1108.
38.
PaulEIrelandMMartiniJ. (2013) Results from the implementation of aid effectiveness principles in the health sector in Mali. Journal of Public Health Policy34: 140–52.
39.
PetcheskyR (2003) Global Prescriptions: Gendering Health and Human Rights. London: Zed Press.
40.
PittCGrecoGPowell-JacksonT. (2010) Countdown to 2015: Assessment of official development assistance to maternal, newborn, and child health, 2003–08. The Lancet376: 1485–1496.
41.
PorterFWallaceT (2013) Aid, NGOs and the shrinking space for women: A perfect storm. In: WallaceTPorterFBowmanR (eds) Aid, NGOs and the Realities of Women’s Lives: A Perfect Storm. Rugby: Practical Action, pp.1–30.
42.
ProstAColbournTSewardN. (2013) Women’s groups practicing participatory learning and action to improve maternal and newborn health in low-resource settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis. The Lancet381: 1736–1746.
43.
RavindranTKS (2012) Universal access: Making health systems work for women. BMC Public Health12(Suppl. 1): S4.
RuckertALabontéR (2014) Public-private partnerships (PPPs) in global health: The good, the bad and the ugly. Third World Quarterly35(9): 1598–1614.
46.
SenGÖstlinP (2009) Gender Equity in Health: The Shifting Frontiers of Evidence and Action. London; New York: Routledge.
47.
ShiffmanJ (2006) Donor funding priorities for communicable disease control in the developing world. Health Policy and Planning21(6): 411–420.
48.
ShiffmanJSmithS (2007) Generation of political priority for global health initiatives: A framework and case study of maternal mortality. The Lancet370: 1370–1379.
49.
ShiffmanJBerlanDHafnerT (2009) Has aid for AIDS raised all health funding boats?Journal Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome52: S45–S48.
50.
SpicerNHarmerAAleshkinaJ. (2011) Circus monkeys or change agents? Civil society advocacy for HIV/AIDS in adverse policy environments. Social Science & Medicine73: 1748–1755.
51.
StandingH (1997) Gender and equity in health sector reform programmes: A review. Health Policy and Planning12(1): 1–18.
52.
StarrsAM (2006) Safe motherhood initiative: 20 years and counting. The Lancet368: 1130–1132.
53.
StorengKT (2014) The GAVI alliance and the ‘Gates Approach’ to health system strengthening. Global Public Health9(8): 865–879.
54.
StorengKTBéhagueD (2014) ‘Playing the numbers game’: Evidence-based advocacy and the technocratic narrowing of the safe motherhood initiative. Medical Anthropology Quarterly28(2): 260–279.
55.
WelbournA (2013) From local to global and back again – Learning from stepping stones. In: WallaceTPorterFBowmanR (eds) Aid, NGOs and the Realities of Women’s Lives: A Perfect Storm. Rugby: Practical Action Publishing, pp.175–188.
56.
YaminAEBoulangerVM (2013) From transforming power to counting numbers: The evolution of sexual and reproductive health and rights in development; and where we want to go from here. Working Paper Series, The Power of Numbers, a Critical Review of MDG Targets for Human Development and Human Rights, FXB Centre for Health and Human Rights, Harvard University. Available at: http://fxb.harvard.edu/working-paper-series (accessed 30 October 2013).
57.
YaminAEFalbKL (2012) Counting what we know: Knowing what to count: Sexual and reproductive rights, maternal health, and the millennium development goals. Nordic Journal on Human Rights30(3): 350–371.
58.
YinRK (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods, 2nd edn, London: SAGE.
59.
ZaidiSMayhewSClelandJ. (2012) Context matters in NGO–government contracting for health service delivery: A case study from Pakistan. Health Policy and Planning27: 570–581.
