UN Women’s feminist engagement with governance by indicators in the Millennium and Sustainable Development Goals

Abstract

The rise of evidence-based policy has brought with it an increase in the use of indicators and data-driven global projects. The United Nations System has used the indicator-based Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) projects to govern policy from above. Of particular interest in this article is how indicators are used to govern gender equality initiatives within the Goals. By using ‘governance by indicators’ as a framework for understanding global policy processes, we can better understand how the power of indicators can help or hinder progress towards gender equality depending on the extent to which it renders gendered concerns visible. Studying indicators in this forum also illuminates spaces of contestation, where policy actors can debate indicators and reshape meaning. Based on this framework, this article explores UN Women’s feminist critique of measurement and knowledge production in the MDGs and SDGs. Looking through their feminist lens applied to this form of knowledge production can yield a better understanding of the use of indicators in shaping evidence-based policy from the global level. In recognizing the value of quantification and data-driven evidence in policy, this article speaks to the tension between feminist critique of quantitative knowledge production and the feminist approach’s welcoming of multiple ways of knowing.

Keywords

Evidence-based policy gender equality governance by indicators Millennium Development Goals norm contestation Sustainable Development Goals UN Women

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Acker

Barry

Esseveld

(1983) Objectivity and truth: Problems in doing feminist research. Women’s Studies International Forum 6(4): 423–435.

Ackerly

True

(2018) With or without feminism? Researching gender and politics in the 21st century. European Journal of Politics and Gender 1(1–2): 259–278.

Arat

ZFK

(2015) Feminisms, women’s rights, and the UN: Would achieving gender equality empower women? American Political Science Review 109(4): 674–689.

Bashevkin

(2013) Women and Politics in Western Europe. London: Routledge.

Best

(2014) Governing Failure: Provisional Expertise and the Transformation of Global Development Finance. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bowen

(2009) Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal 9(2): 27–40.

Brisolara

Seigart

SenGupta

(2014) Feminist Evaluation and Research: Theory and Practice. New York: Guilford Press.

Büthe

Mattli

(2011) The New Global Rulers: The Privatization of Regulation in the World Economy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Caglar

Prügl

Zwingel

(2013) Introducing feminist strategies in international governance. In: Caglar

Prügl

Zwingel

(eds) Feminist Strategies in International Governance. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 1–18.

10.

Carey

Dickinson

Olney

(2019) What can feminist theory offer policy implementation challenges? Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice 15: 143–159.

11.

Charlesworth

Chinkin

(2013) The creation of UN women. RegNet research paper series no. 2013/7. Canberra, ACT, Australia: Regulatory Institutions Network.

12.

Consortium on Gender, Security and Human Rights (2017) Feminist Critiques of the Sustainable Development Goals. Boston, MA: Consortium on Gender, Security and Human Rights.

13.

Cornwall

Rivas

(2015) From ‘gender equality and ‘women’s empowerment’ to global justice: Reclaiming a transformative agenda for gender and development. Third World Quarterly 36(2): 396–415.

14.

Davis

Kingsbury

Merry

(2012) Indicators as a technology of global governance. Law & Society Review 46(1): 71–104.

15.

Dubrow

Ilinca

(2019) Quantitative approaches to intersectionality: New methodological directions and implications for policy analysis. In: Hankivsky

Jordan-Zachery

(eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Intersectionality in Public Policy (The Politics of Intersectionality). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 195–214.

16.

Esquivel

(2016) Power and the Sustainable Development Goals: A feminist analysis. Gender & Development 24(1): 9–23.

17.

Estrada-Tanck

(2018) International law, indicators and global governance. Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional 10(1): 196–212.

18.

Fonow

Cook

(2005) Feminist methodology: New applications in the academic and public policy. Signs 30(4): 2211–2236.

19.

Fukuda-Parr

(2014) Global goals as a policy tool: Intended and unintended consequences. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities 15(2–3): 118–131.

20.

Fukuda-Parr

(2016) From the millennium development goals to the Sustainable Development Goals: Shifts in purpose, concept, and politics of global goal setting for development. Gender & Development 24(1): 43–52.

21.

Fukuda-Parr

Hulme

(2011) International norm dynamics and the ‘end of poverty’: Understanding the millennium development goals. Global Governance 17: 17–36.

22.

Gabizon

(2016) Women’s movements’ engagement in the SDGs: Lessons learned from the women’s major group. Gender & Development 24(1): 99–110.

23.

Hansen

Porter

(2012) What do numbers do in transnational governance? International Political Sociology 6(4): 409–426.

24.

Haraway

(1988) Situated knowledges: The science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Studies 14(3): 575–599.

25.

Harding

(1986) The Science Question in Feminism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

26.

Head

(2008) Three lenses of evidence-based policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration 67(1): 1–11.

27.

Hughes

Cohen

(2012) Feminists really do count: The complexity of feminist methodologies. In: Hughes

Cohen

(eds) Feminism Counts: Quantitative Methods and Researching Gender. Abington: Routledge, pp. 1–9.

28.

Jenson

(1986) Gender and reproduction: Or, babies and the state. Studies in Political Economy 20(1): 9–46.

29.

Jenson

(2015) The fading goal of gender equality: Three policy directions that underpin the resilience of gendered socio-economic inequalities. Social Politics 22(4): 539–560.

30.

Karim

Hill

(2018) The study of gender and women in cross-national political science research: Rethinking concepts and measurement. In: Working paper presented at the Annual Convention of the International Studies Association. Available at: http://www.womanstats.org/KarimHillGenderEqualityArticleApr2018.pdf.

31.

Kelley

Simmons

(2015) Politics by number: Indicators as social pressure in international relations. American Journal of Political Science 59(1): 55–70.

32.

Kim

(2017) Gender and the Sustainable Development Goals. Global Social Policy 17(2): 239–244.

33.

Lim

(2016) Rethinking the gender debate: A conversation with UN Women Executive Director Phumzile Mlambo-Ngcuka. Yale Journal of International Affairs, 16 March. Interview.

34.

Marx

(2019) Accounting for equality: Gender budgeting and moderate feminism. Gender, Work & Organization 26(8): 1176–1190.

35.

Menon

(2015) UN Women: Prospects and challenges. Future United Nations Development System brief no 30. Available at: https://futureun.org/media/archive1/briefings/FUNDS_Brief30_June2015_UN_Women.pdf.

36.

Niemann

Martens

(2018) Soft governance by hard fact? The OECD as a knowledge broker in education policy. Global Social Policy 18: 267–283.

37.

Oakley

(1998) Gender, methodology and people’s ways of knowing: Some problems with feminism and the paradigm debate in social science. Sociology 32(4): 707–731.

38.

Padamsee

(2009) Culture in connection: Re-contextualizing ideational processes in the analysis of policy development. Social Politics 16(4): 413–445.

39.

Podems

(2010) Feminist evaluation and gender approaches: There’s a difference? Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation 6(14): 1–17.

40.

Powell

(2016) Gender indicators as global governance: Not your father’s World Bank. Georgetown Journal of Gender and the Law 17(3): 777–807.

41.

Rai

Brown

Ruwanpura

(2019) SDG8: Decent work and economic growth – A gendered analysis. World Development 113: 368–380.

42.

Robson

(1992) Accounting numbers as ‘inscription’: Action at a distance and the development of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society 17(7): 685–708.

43.

Rosche

(2016) Agenda 2030 and the Sustainable Development Goals: Gender equality at last? An Oxfam perspective. Gender and Development 24(1): 111–126.

44.

Rose Taylor

(2018) On measurement and meaning: How indicators shape, make, or break global policy goals and outcomes. The role of indicators in promoting gender equality through the Millennium and Sustainable Development Goals, PhD dissertation, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada.

45.

Rose Taylor

Mahon

(2019) Gender equality from the MDGs to the SDGs: The struggle continues. In: Dalby

Horton

Mahon

(eds) Achieving the Sustainable Development Goals: Global Governance Challenges. Abingdon: Routledge, pp. 54–70.

46.

Sen

(2013) Gender equality in the post-2015 development agenda: Lessons from the MDGs. IDS Bulletin 44(5–6): 42–48.

47.

Sen

(2019) Gender equality and women’s empowerment: Feminist mobilization for the SDGs. Global Policy 10(S1): 28–38.

48.

Tesfaye

Wyant

(2016) Achieving gender equality and empowering all women and girls. In: Shawki

(ed.) International Norms, Normative Change, and the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books, pp. 131–150.

49.

UN Women (2013a) A Transformative Stand-Alone Goal on Achieving Gender Equality, Women’s Rights and Women’s Empowerment: Imperatives and Key Components. New York: UN Women.

50.

UN Women (2013b) Report of the Expert Group Meeting on Structural and Policy Constraints in Achieving the MDGs for Women and Girls. Mexico City, Mexico: UN Women & ECLAC.

51.

UN Women (2018a) Press Release: New UN Women Report Uncovers Significant Gaps for Women’s Empowerment and Puts Forth Robust Agenda to Shift Gears. Available at: http://www.unwomen.org/en/news/stories/2018/2/press-release-launch-of-sdg-monitoring-report-gender-equality-in-the-2030-agenda.

52.

UN Women (2018b) Turning Promises into Action: Gender Equality in the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. New York: United Nations.

53.

UN Women (n.d.-a). About UN Women. Available at: http://www.unwomen.org/en/about-us/about-un-women.

54.

UN Women (n.d.-b). Guiding Documents. Available at: http://www.unwomen.org/en/about-us/guiding-documents.

55.

United Nations (2001) UN roadmap towards the implementation of the millennium declaration. Report of the secretary-general A/56/326. New York: United Nations.

56.

United Nations (2013) A New Global Partnership: Eradicate Poverty and Transform Economies through Sustainable Development: The Report of the High-Level Panel of Eminent Persons on the Post-2015 Development Agenda, 2013. New York: United Nations.

57.

United Nations (2015) Transforming our world 2015: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. United Nations summit outcome document A/RES/70/1. New York: United Nations.

58.

Wiener

(2014) Introduction: Contestation as a norm-generative social practice. In: Wiener

(ed.) A Theory of Contestation. New York: Springer, pp. 1–15.

59.

Westmarland

(2001) The quantitative/qualitative debate and feminist research: A subjective view of objectivity. Forum: Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 2(1): 13.