This study investigates an old question that has re-emerged in social policymaking and in analyses of global social development: to what extent does targeting and size of social transfers matter for poverty? Using multilevel logistic regression and Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg (LIS) income data for 40 middle- and high-income countries, we show that the size of transfer income has greater explanatory value for cross-country differences in poverty than the degree of targeting of transfer income. The results are remarkably robust in terms of estimated individual-level and country-level compositional and confounding factors.
BahleTPfeiferMWendtC (2010) Social assistance. In: CastlesFGLeibfriedSLewisJ. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 448–461.
2.
BarrientosAHulmeD (2009) Social protection for the poor and the poorest in developing countries: Reflections on a quiet revolution. Oxford Development Studies37(4): 439–456.
3.
BarrientosANiño-ZarazúaMMaitrotM (2010) Social assistance in developing countries database, version 5.0. Brooks World Poverty Institute Working Paper, University of Manchester, Manchester.
4.
BeckermanW (1979) The impact of income maintenance payments on poverty in Britain, 1975. Economic Journal89(354): 261–279.
5.
BélandDBlomqvistPAndersenJG. (2014) The universal decline of universality? Social policy change in Canada, Denmark, Sweden, and the United Kingdom. Social Policy & Administration48(7): 739–756.
6.
BradyD (2005) The welfare state and relative poverty in rich western democracies, 1967–1997. Social Forces83(4): 1329–1364.
7.
BradyDBurrowayR (2012) Targeting, universalism, and single-mother poverty: A multilevel analysis across 18 affluent democracies. Demography49(2): 719–746.
8.
BriggsA (2006) The welfare state in historical perspective. In: PiersonPCastlesFG (eds) The Welfare State Reader. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 16–29.
9.
BuhmannBRainwaterLSchmausG. (1988) Equivalence scales, well-being, inequality, and poverty: Sensitivity estimates across ten countries using the Luxembourg Income Study (LIS) data base. Review of Income and Wealth2: 115–142.
10.
CastlesFG (2004) The Future of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11.
ChenSRavallionM (2010) The developing world is poorer than we thought, but no less successful in the fight against poverty. The Quarterly Journal of Economics125(4): 1577–1625.
12.
EsserIFerrariniTNelsonK. (2009) A framework for comparing social protection in developing countries with the example of child benefits. International Social Security Review62(1): 91–115.
13.
FerrariniTNelsonKHöögH (2012) From universalism to selectivity: Old wine in new bottles for child benefits. In: MarxINelsonK (eds) Minimum Income Protection in Flux. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 137–160.
14.
FerrariniTNelsonKKorpiW. (2013) Social citizenship rights and social insurance replacement rate validity: Pitfalls and possibilities. Journal of European Public Policy20: 1251–1266.
FigariFMatsaganisMSutherlandH (2013) Are European social safety nets tight enough? Coverage and adequacy of minimum income schemes in 14 EU countries. International Journal of Social Welfare22(1): 3–14.
17.
GoñiELopezJHServenL (2011) Fiscal redistribution and income inequality in Latin America. World Development39(9): 1558–1569.
18.
HandaSDavisB (2006) The experience of conditional cash transfers in Latin America and the Caribbean. Development Policy Review24(5): 513–536.
19.
HanlonJBarrientosAHulmeD (2010) Just Give Money to the Poor: The Development Revolution from the South. West Hartford, CT: Kumarian Press.
20.
HolmqvistG (2011) Perspectives on Inequality and Social Protection. Doctoral Thesis, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg.
21.
HuberEStephensJD (2001) Development and Crisis of the Welfare State: Parties and Policies in Global Markets. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
International Labour Organization (2014) World Social Protection Report 2014/15 Building Economic Recovery, Inclusive Development and Social Justice. Geneva: International Labour Office.
24.
KakwaniN (1986) Analyzing Redistribution Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25.
KenworthyL (1999) Do social welfare policies reduce poverty? A cross-national assessment. Social Forces77(3): 1119–1140.
26.
KenworthyL (2011) Progress for the Poor. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
27.
KorpiWPalmeJ (1998) The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: Welfare state institutions, inequality and poverty in the Western Countries. American Sociological Review63: 661–687.
28.
LopezJHPerryG (2008) Inequality in Latin America: Determinants and Consequences. Policy Research Working paper no. 4504. New York: World Bank.
29.
MarxINelsonK (2012) A new dawn for minimum income protection in Europe? In: MarxINelsonK (eds) Minimum Income Protection in Flux. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan, pp. 1–27.
30.
MeulemanBBillietJ (2009) A Monte Carlo sample size study: How many countries are needed for accurate multilevel SEM?Survey Research Methods3(1): 45–58.
31.
MkandawireT (2005) Targeting and universalism in Poverty Reduction. Social Policy and Development Programme. Paper No. 23. Geneva: UNRISD.
32.
MontanariINelsonKPalmeJ (2007) Convergence pressures and responses: Recent social insurance developments in modern welfare states. Comparative Sociology6(3): 295–323.
33.
NelsonK (2006) The last resort: Determinants of generosity of means-tested minimum income protection in welfare democracies. In: CarrollEErikssonL (eds) Welfare Politics Cross-Examined: Eclecticist Analytical Perspectives on Sweden and the Developed World, from the 1880s to the 2000s. Amsterdam: Aksant Academic Publishers.
34.
NelsonK (2008) Minimum income protection and European integration: Trends and levels of minimum benefits in comparative perspective 1990–2005. International Journal of Health Services38(1): 103–124.
35.
NelsonK (2011) Improving the efficiency of social protection. Synthesis Report. DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, European Commission, Brussels, 29–30November.
36.
NelsonK (2013) Social assistance and EU poverty thresholds 1990–2008. Are European welfare systems providing just and fair protection against low income?European Sociological Review29(2): 386–401.
37.
OECD (2008) Growing Unequal? Income Distribution and Poverty in OECD Countries. Paris: OECD.
38.
OECD (2013) Pensions at a Glance 2013: Retirement-Income Systems in OECD and G20 Countries. Paris: OECD.
39.
PalmeJ (2006) Welfare states and inequality: Institutional designs and distributive outcome. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility24(4): 387–403.
40.
RavallionMChenSSangraulaP (2009) Dollar a day revisited. World Bank Economic Review23(2): 163–184.
41.
RawlingsLBRubioGM (2005) Evaluating the impact of conditional cash transfer programs. World Bank Research Observer20(1): 29–55.
42.
RodriguesCF (2011) Minimum income in Portugal: Changing the rules in times of crisis. Host Country Independent Expert Paper. DG Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, European Commission, Brussels, 29–30November.
43.
SenA (1983) Poor, relatively speaking. Oxford Economic Papers35: 135–169.
44.
SkoufiasELindertKShapiroJ (2010) Globalization and the role of public transfers in redistributing income in Latin America and the Caribbean. World Development38(6): 895–907.
45.
SmeedingTMRainwaterLBurtlessG (2001) U.S. poverty in cross-national context. In: DanzigerSHHavemanRH (eds) Understanding Poverty. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 162–192.
46.
SoaresFRibasRPOsórioRG (2010) Evaluation the impact of Brazil’s Bolsa Família: Cash transfer programs in comparative perspective. Latin American Research Review45(2): 173–190.
47.
Social Protection Committee (2011) SPC assessment of the social dimension of the Europe 2020 strategy. Full Report. European Council, Brussels, March.
48.
SwankD (2005) Globalisation, domestic politics, and welfare state retrenchment in capitalist democracies. Social Policy and Society4(2): 183–195.
49.
TownsendP (1985) A sociological approach to the measurement of poverty: A rejoinder to Professor Amartya Sen. Oxford Economic Papers37: 659–668.
50.
United Nations Development Programme (2014) Human Development Report 2014 Sustaining Human Progress: Reducing Vulnerabilities and Building Resilience. New York: United Nations Development Programme.
51.
Van OorschotW (2002) Targeting welfare: On the functions and dysfunctions of means-testing in social policy. In: TownsendPGordonD (eds) World Poverty New Policies to Defeat an Old Enemy. Bristol: The Policy Press.
52.
WoodGDGoughI (2006) A comparative welfare regime approach to global social policy. World Development34(10): 1696–1712.
53.
World Bank (2012) Resilience, Equity, and Opportunity: The World Bank’s Social Protection and Labor Strategy 2012–2022. New York: World Bank.
54.
World Bank (2014) World Development Report 2014: Risk and Opportunity. Managing Risk for Development. New York: World Bank.
