This article assesses the contribution of existing work on policy transfer to our understanding of policy change on the international stage. It explores the impact of American ideas and practices on aspects of social policy in the UK. It argues for a focus on the role of ‘epistemic communities’ and policy learning in the development of generic international agendas such as the ‘Americanized medical model’ of evidence-based practice adopted by the New Labour government in health and education. It argues that international social policy analysis should take account of the movement of ideas and practices at three levels: global/international, national and inter-organizational.
Ball, S. (1990) Politics and Policy Making in Education. London: Routledge .
2.
Ball, S. (1998) ‘Big Policies/Small World: An Introduction to International Perspectives in Education Policy’ , Comparative Education34(2): 119-130 .
3.
Blunkett, D. (2000) ‘Influence or Irrelevance: Can Social Science Improve Government?’ , Research Intelligence71: 12-21 .
4.
Cluett, E. R. and Bluff, R. (2000) Principles and Practice of Research in Midwifery. Edinburgh: Balliére Tindall .
5.
Daguerre, A. and Taylor-Gooby, P. (2004) ‘Neglecting Europe: Explaining the Predominance of American Ideas in New Labour’s Welfare Policies Since 1997’ , Journal of European Social Policy14(1): 25-39 .
6.
Davies, H. T. O. , Nutley, S. M. and Smith, P. C. (eds) (2000) What Works? Evidence-Based Policy and Practice in Public Services. Bristol: Polity Press .
7.
Davies, P. (1999) ‘What is Evidence-Based Education?’ , British Journal of Educational Studies47(2): 108-121 .
8.
Deacon, A. (2000) ‘Learning from the US?: The Influence of American Ideas Upon “New Labour” Thinking on Welfare Reform’ , Policy and Politics28(1): 5-18 .
9.
DfEE (1997) ‘Excellence in Schools’, White Paper. London: DfEE HMSO .
10.
DfEE (1998) Teachers Meeting the Challenge of Change. London: DfEE HMSO .
11.
Dolowitz, D. and Marsh, D. (1996) ‘Who Learns What From Whom? A Review of the Policy Transfer Literature’ , Political Studies44(2): 343-357 .
12.
Dolowitz, D. with Hulme, R. , Nellis, M. and O’Neal, F. (2000) Policy Transfer and British Social Policy. Buckingham: Open University Press .
13.
Evans, J. , Sharp, C. and Benefield, P. (2000) ‘Systematic Reviews of Educational Research: Does the Medical Model Fit? National Foundation for Educational Research’ , paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Conference, Cardiff University, 7-10 September.
14.
Evans, M. and Davies, J. (1999) ‘Understanding Policy Transfer: A Multi-Level, Multi-Disciplinary Perspective’ , Public Administration77(2): 361-385 .
15.
Everton, T. , Galton, M. and Pell, T. (2000) ‘Teachers’ Perspectives on Educational Research: Knowledge and Context’ , Journal of Education for Teaching26(2): 167-182 .
16.
Fischer, F. and Forrester, J. (1993) The Argumentative Turn in Policy Analysis and Planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press .
17.
Haas, E. (1990) When Knowledge is Power: Three Models of Change in International Organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press .
18.
Haas, E. (1992) ‘Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Co-ordination’ , International Organisation46(1): 1-35 .
19.
Hannan, A. , Enright, H. and Ballard, P. (1997) ‘Using Research: The Results of a Pilot Study Comparing Teachers, General Practitioners and Surgeons’, accessed January 2006, http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/000000851.htm
20.
Hargreaves, D. (1996) ‘Teaching as a Research-Based Profession: Possibilities and Prospects’ , British Educational Research Journal23(2): 141-161 .
21.
Hatcher, R. (1996) ‘The Limitations of the New Social Democratic Agendas’, in R. Hatcher and K. Jones (eds) Education after the Conservatives. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books .
22.
Hay / McBer (2000) ‘Research into Teacher Effectiveness’, accessed 21 March 2006, http://www.teachernet.gov.uk/_doc/1487/haymcber.doc
23.
Hulme, R. and Hulme, M. (2000a) ‘Using Technology to Combat Social Exclusion in Education: The Limits of Lesson-Drawing From the USA’ , Education and Social Justice3(1): 34-44 .
24.
Hulme, R. and Hulme, M. (2000b) ‘How Good Practice in Virginia Can Influence Change in England: Trans-Atlantic Lesson Drawing in the Use of Technology in Teaching’, Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education CITE Summer 2000, accessed 27 January 2006, http://www.citejournal.org/vol1/iss2/currentpractice/article1.htm
25.
Hulme, R. and Hulme, M. (2004) ‘Policy Transfer and Evidence Based Practice in Education’ , paper presented at British Education Research Association, Social Justice SIG Seminar, University of Northampton, 4 May.
26.
Jones, K. (ed.) (1996) Education after the Conservatives. Stoke on Trent: Trentham Books .
27.
Jones, R. , Lamont, T. and Haines, A. (1995) ‘Setting Priorities for Research and Development in the NHS: A Case Study on the Interface Between Primary and Secondary Care’ , British Medical Journal311: 1076-1080 , accessed 27 January 2006, http://bmj.bnjjournals.com/cgi/content/full/311/7012/1076
28.
King, D. (1999) In the Name of Liberalism: Illiberal Social Policy in the United States and Britain. Oxford: Oxford University Press .
29.
McKibbon, K. A. (1998) ‘Evidence Based Practice’ , Bulletin of the Medical Library Association86(3): 396-401
30.
McLaughlin, C. (2000) ‘Parallel Processes in Learning to Learn: A School/University Partnership Focussed on Developing the Social Aspects of Pedagogy’, in M. Griffiths and G. Impey (eds) Working Partnerships: Better Research and Learning (pp. 77-91). Nottingham: Nottingham Trent University .
31.
Marsh, D. and Rhodes, R. A. W. (1993) Policy Networks in British Government. Oxford: Clarendon .
32.
Oakley, A. (2000) Experiments in Knowing: Gender and Method in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: Polity Press .
33.
Odden, A. and Kelley, C. (1997) Paying Teachers for What They Know and Do. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press .
34.
Olssen, M. , Codd, J. and O’Neill, A. (2004) Education Policy, Globalisation, Citizenship & Democracy. London: Sage .
35.
Pring, R. (2000) Philosophy of Educational Research. London: Continuum .
36.
Rose, R. (1991) ‘What is Lesson Drawing?’ , Journal of Public Policy11(1): 1-22 .
37.
Sabatier, P. and Jenkins-Smith, H. (eds) (1993) Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalitions Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press .
38.
Sebba, J. (1999a) ‘Examples of Schools’ Approaches to Collecting Data’ , paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, University of York, 11-14 September.
39.
Sebba, J. (1999b) ‘Developing Evidence-Informed Policy and Practice in Education’ , paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Conference, University of Sussex. Brighton, 2-5 September.
40.
Stone, D. (ed.) (2000) Banking on Knowledge: The Genesis of the Global Development Network. London: Routledge .
41.
Stone, D. (2001) ‘Think Tanks, Global Lesson Drawing and Networking Social Policy Ideas’ , Global Social Policy1(3): 338-360 .
42.
Taylor, S. , Rizvi, F. , Lingard, B. and Henry, M. (1997) Education Policy and the Politics of Change. London: Routledge .
43.
Thomas, G. and Pring, R. (eds) (2004) Evidence-Based Practice in Education. Maidenhead: Open University Press .
44.
Thurow, L. (1996) The Future of Capitalism. St Leonards: Allen and Unwin .
45.
Tooley, J. with Darby, D. (1998) Educational Research: A Critique. London: Ofsted .
46.
Whitty, G. and Edwards, T. (1998) ‘School Choice Policies in England and the United States: An Exploration of their Origin and Significance’ , Comparative Education34(2): 211-227 .
