This article analyses how asylum seekers are constructed as an out-group in some of the narratives provided by practitioners who were interviewed as part of a wider research study of social workers’ discourses of asylum seekers.
Findings
Using discursive psychology, the article identifies interpretative repertoires that were used by social workers in their formulations of asylum seekers as the other. The article explores the linguistic resources that were deployed in these formulations.
Applications
The article highlights the potential contributions of discursive perspectives to social work research, teaching and practice as it illuminates the pivotal role that language plays within the profession in the construction of subjectivities, and specifically in relation to the protection, perpetuation and normalisation of discrimination.
AchugarM. (2004) The events and actors of 11 September 2011 as seen from Uruguay: Analysis of daily newspaper editorials. Discourse & Society15(2–3): 291–320. doi:10.1177/0957926504041021.
2.
BakerP. (2006) Using corpora in discourse analysis, London, England: Continuum.
3.
Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyzanowski, M., McEnery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19(3), 273. doi:10.1177/0957926508088962.
4.
BarclayA.FergusonI. (2002) Seeking peace of mind: The mental health needs of asylum seekers in Glasgow, Stirling, Scotland: Department of Applied Social Science, University of Stirling.
5.
BilligM. (1988) Ideological dilemmas: A social psychology of everyday thinking, London, England: Sage.
CapdevilaR.CallaghanJ. E. M. (2008) ‘It's not racist. It’s common sense’: A critical analysis of political discourse around asylum and immigration in the UK. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology18: 1–16. doi:10.1002/casp.904.
8.
ChuW. C. K.TsuiM. S. (2008) The nature of practice wisdom in social work revisited. International Social Work51(1): 47–54. doi:10.1177/0020872807083915.
9.
CoeK.DomkeD.GrahamE. S.LockettJ. S.PickardV. W. (2004) No shades of grey: The binary dscourse of George W. Bush and an echoing press. Journal of Communication54(2): 234–252. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2004.tb02626.x.
10.
CollettJ. (2004) Immigration is social work issue. In: HayesD. (ed.) Social work, immigration and asylum: Debates, dilemmas and ethical issues for social work and social care oractice, Philadelphia, PA: Jessica Kingsley.
11.
CrawleyH. (2010) Chance or choice? Understanding why asylum seekers come to the UK, London, England: Refugee Council.
12.
DominelliL. (2012) Anti oppressive practice. In: GrayM.MidgelyJ.WebbS. (eds) The Sage Handbook for Social Work, London, England: Sage, pp. 329–340.
13.
EdleyN. (2001) Analysing masculinity: Interpretative repertoires, ideological dilemmas and subject positions. In: WetherellM.TaylorS.YatesS. J. (eds) Discourse as data: A guide for analysts, London, England: Sage, pp. 189–228.
14.
El RefaieE. (2001) Metaphors we discriminate by: Naturalized themes in Australian newspaper articles about asylum seekers. Journal of Sociolinguistics5(3): 352–371. doi:10.1111/1467-9481.00154.
15.
EveryD.AugoustinosM. (2007) Constructions of racism in the Australian parliamentary debates on asylum seekers. Discourse & Society18(4): 411–436. doi:10.1177/0957926507077427.
16.
EveryD.AugoustinosM. (2008) Constructions of Australia in pro- and anti-asylum seeker political discourse. Nations and Nationalism14(3): 562–580. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8129.2008.00356.x.
17.
FaircloughN. (1989) Language and power, Harlow, England: Longman.
18.
Fell, B., & Fell, P. (2013). Welfare across borders: A social work process with adult asylum seekers. British Journal of Social Work. Advance online publication. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bct003.
19.
FinneyN.RobinsonV. (2008) Local press, dispersal and community in the construction of asylum debates. Social & Cultural Geography9(4): 397–413. doi:10.1080/14649360802077038.
20.
FoucaultM. (1972) The archaeology of knowledge, London, England: Tavistock.
21.
GoldsteinH. (1990) The knowledge base of social work practice: Theory, wisdom, analogue or art?Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services71: 32–43.
GoodmanS. (2008) The generalizability of discursive research. Qualitative Research in Psychology5(4): 265–275. doi:10.1080/14780880802465890.
24.
HaarV. D. (2007) Ma(r)king differences in Dutch social work: Professional discourse and ways of relating to clients in context, Armsterdam, the Netherlands: Dutch University Press.
25.
HallC.SlembrouckS.SarangiS. (2006) Language practices in social work: Categorisation and accountability in child welfare, London, England: Routledge.
26.
HallS. (1997) Representation: Cultural representations and signifying practices, London, England: Sage, in association with The Open University.
27.
HardyC.PhillipsL. J. (2002) Discourse analysis: Investigating processes of social constructionism, London, England: Sage.
28.
Home Office. (2013) Immigration statistics: October to December 2012, London, England: Author.
29.
HudsonJ. D. (1997) A model of professional knowledge for social work practice. Australian Social Work50(3): 35–44. doi:10.1080/03124079708414096.
30.
HumphriesB. (2004) An unacceptable role for social work: Implementing immigration policy. British Journal of Social Work34(1): 93–107. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch007.
31.
Jones, J. (2000). Asylum seekers in UK receive poor health care. British Medical Journal, 320(1492). doi:dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.320.7248.1492.
32.
KohliR. K. S. (2006) The comfort of strangers: Social work practice with unaccompanied asylum-seeking children and young people in the UK. Child and Family Social Work11(1): 1–10. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2206.2006.00393.x.
33.
KrzyzanowskiM.WodakR. (2009) The politics of exclusion: Debating migration in Austria, New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction.
34.
LynnN.LeaS. (2003) ‘A phantom menace and the new Apartheid’: The social construction of asylum-seekers in the United Kingdom. Discourse and Society14(4): 425–452. doi:10.1177/0957926503014004002.
35.
Masocha, S. (2012). How do social workers construct asylum seekers as objects of knowledge and targets of intervention? (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of Dundee, Scotland.
36.
Masocha, S. (2013). We do the best we can: Accounting practices in social work discourses of asylum seekers. British Journal of Social Work. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1093/bjsw/bct048.
37.
MasochaS.SimpsonM. K. (2011) Xenoracism: Towards a critical understanding of the construction of asylum seekers and its implications for social work practice. Practice23(1): 5–18. doi:10.1080/09503153.2010.536211.
38.
McDonaldM. (2005) Constructing insecurity: Australian security discourse and policy post-2001. International Relations19(3): 297–320. doi:10.1177/0047117805055408.
39.
MynottE. (2005) Compromise, collaboration and collective resistance: Different strategies in the face of the war on asylum seekers. In: FergusonI.LavaletteM.WhitmoreE. (eds) Gobalisation, global justice and social work, Abingdon, England: Routledge, pp. 122–139.
40.
O’SullivanT. (2005) Some theoretical propositions on the nature of practice wisdom. Journal of Social Work5(2): 221–242. doi:10.1177/1468017305054977.
ParrottL. (2009) Constructive marginality: Conflicts and dilemmas in cultural competency and anti-oppressive practice. Social work education28(6): 617–630. doi:10.1080/02615470903027322.
43.
PhillipsL. J.JorgensenM. W. (2002) Discourse analysis as theory and method, London, England: Sage.
44.
PickeringS. (2001) Common sense and original deviancy: News discourses and asylum seekers in Australia. Journal of Refugee Studies14(2): 169–186. doi:10.1093/jrs/14.2.169.
45.
PithouseA.AtkinsonP. (1988) Telling the case: Occupational narrative in social work. In: CouplandN. (ed.) Styles of discourse, London, England: Croom Helm, pp. 183–200.
46.
PotterJ.WetherellM. (1987) Discourse and social psychology: Beyond attitudes and behaviour, London, England: Sage.
47.
RigginsS. H. (1997) The rhetoric of Othering. In: RigginsS. H. (ed.) The language and politics of exclusion: Others in discourse, London, England: Sage, pp. 1–30.
48.
SalesR. (2002) The deserving and undeserving? Refugees, asylum seekers and welfare in Britain. Critical Social Policy22(3): 456–478. doi:10.1177/026101830202200305.
49.
ScheppersE.van DongenE.DekkerJ.GeertzenJ.DekkerJ. (2006) Potential barriers to the use of health services among ethnic minorities: A review. Family Practice23(3): 325–348. doi:10.1093/fampra/cmi113.
50.
SimD.BowesA. (2007) Asylum seekers in Scotland: The accommodation of diversity. Social Policy & Administration41: 729–746. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00582.x.
51.
SonwalkerP. (2005) Banal journalism: The centrality of ‘us-them’ binary in discourse. In: StuartA. (ed.) Journalism: Critical issues, Maidenhead, England: McGraw-Hill Education, pp. 261–273.
van DijkT. A. (1997) Political discourses and racism: Describing others in western parliaments. In: HigginsS. H. (ed.) The language and politics of exclusion: Others in discourse, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
54.
van DijkT. A. (2004) Text and context of parliamentary debates. In: BayleyP. (ed.) Cross-cultural perspectives on parliamentary discourse, Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Benjamins, pp. 339–372.
55.
WodakR.MeyerM. (2001) Methods of critical discourse analysis, London, England: Sage.
56.
WrenK. (2004) Building bridges: Local responses to the resettlement of asylum seekers in Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland: Scottish Centre for Research on Social Justice, pp. 1–88.
