The parallels of assimilation and allyship: Implications for social workers moving forward

Abstract

Summary

This study analyzes the parallels between immigration-focused assimilation efforts made by social workers in the United States during the Progressive Era (early 1900s) and allyship efforts made by social workers today. Content analysis, a methodological approach used for identifying and categorizing emerging themes in primary texts that can be reinforced through secondary sources, allowed for the historical discourse in social work in the early 20th century to be examined thoroughly and critically. The aims and methods for achieving assimilation that social workers utilized parallel the performative actions allied social workers take today.

Findings

Social workers during the Progressive Era believed themselves more “pro-immigrant” than the rest of society. However, after examining their assimilationist tactics, it is evident their actions did not differ significantly from those who would not make that claim. Similarly, while social workers today may claim to be allies to marginalized groups, their solidarity can and should be questioned without proper action and risk.

Application

By highlighting unjust practices of the past that were posed as progressive and equitable, social workers are tasked with taking an inventory of their positions in anti-oppressive movements and examining whether they are genuinely contributing to efforts made by target groups or merely performing for their peers.