•Summary: This article explores the values, knowledge, policy and practice
of three different programs of foster care in Israel and their implications for the
experiences of all involved: children, parents, foster parents and social workers.
•Findings: An innovative methodology is used, whereby social work students
collect data. Analysis of this qualitative data collected through semi-structured
interviews clarifies the issues that are of major concern for foster children,
parents, foster parents and foster workers. A connection is made between the service
models that support detached, complementary or reciprocal relations and experiences
in care.
•Applications: The article established the viewpoint that foster care is a
creation of a new familial system that needs to deal with issues of power and create
reciprocal relations amongst its partners. The conditions necessary for successful
care are highlighted.
Arthur, L. C.
and
Leonard, T.
(1997)
‘Behavioral Correlates of Parental Visiting During Family Foster Care’
, Child Welfare76(2):
309–325
.
2.
Bartlett, H. M.
(1970) The Common Base of Social Work Practice.
Washington, DC: National Association of Social Workers
.
3.
Benbenishty, R.
and
Oyserman, D.
(1992)
‘Keeping in Touch: Ecological Factors Related to Foster Care Visitation’
, Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal9(6):
541–554
.
4.
Benbenishty, R.
and
Oyserman, D.
(1995)
‘Children in Foster Care: Their Present Situation and Plans for
the Future’
, International Social Work38(2):
117–31
.
5.
Bowlby, J.
(1969) Attachment and Loss.
London: Hogarth Press
.
6.
Bronfenbrenner, U.
(1986)
‘Ecology of the Family as a Context of Human Development:
Research Perspectives’
, Developmental Psychology22(6):
723–742
.
7.
Chambon, A. S.
,
Irving, A.
and
Epstein, L.
(eds) (1999) Reading Foucault for Social Work.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
8.
Erera, P. I.
(1997)
‘Foster Parents’Attitude Toward Birth Parents and
Caseworker: Implications for Visitation’
, Families in Society78(5):
511–518
.
9.
Fahlberg, V. I.
(1991) A Child’s Journey Through Placement.
Indianapolis, IN: Perspectives Press
.
10.
Fanshel, D.
and
Shinn, E.
(1987) Children in Foster Care: A Longitudinal
Investigation.
New York: Columbia University Press
.
11.
Fein, E.
and
Staff, I.
(1993)
‘Last Best Chance: Findings from a Reunification Service Program’
, Child Welfare72(1):
25–40
.
12.
Gardner, G.
(1996)
‘The Concept of Family: Perceptions of Children in Family Foster Care’
, Child Welfare75(2):
161–182
.
13.
Goldstein, J.
,
Freud, A.
and
Solnit, A.
(1979) Beyond the Interest of the Child.
New York: The Free Press
.
14.
Gordon, W. E.
(1962)
‘A Critique of the Working Definition’
, Social Work7(4):
3–13
.
15.
Huges, D. A.
(1997). Facilitating Developmental Attachment: The Road to
Emotional Recovery and Behavioral Change in Foster and Adopted Children.
London: Jason Aronson
.
16.
Inch, L. J.
(1999)
‘Aspects of Foster Fathering’
, Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal16(5):
393–412
.
17.
Israeli Ministry of Labor and Welfare
(1997) ‘Intervention with Foster
Families’, Social Work Rules and Regulations.
Israeli Ministry of Labor and Welfare
: http://www.molsa.gov.il(Hebrew).
18.
Jaffe, E. D.
(1982) Child Welfare in Israel.
New York: Prager
.
19.
Johnson, P. R.
,
Yoken, C.
and
Voss, R.
(1995)
‘Family Foster Care Placement: The Child’s Perspective’
, Child Welfare74(5):
959–974
.
20.
Kahkonen, P.
(1997)
‘From the Child Welfare Trap to the Foster Care Trap’
, Child Welfare76(3):
429–445
.
21.
Katz, L. L.
(1987)
‘An Overview of Current Clinical Issues in Separation and Placement’
, Child and Adolescent Social Work4(3–4):
61–78
.
22.
Kelly, G.
and
Gilligan, R.
(2000) Issues in Foster Care: Policy, Practice and
Research.
London and Philadelphia: Jessica Kingsley
.
23.
Littner, N.
(1975)
‘The Importance of the Natural Parents to the Child in Placement’
, Child Welfare54(3):
175–181
.
24.
Maluccio, A. N.
,
Warsh, R.
and
Pine, B. A.
(1993) ‘Family Reunification: An
Overview’, in
B. A. Pine
,
R. Warsh
and
A. N. Maluccio
(eds) Together Again: Family Reunification in Foster Care, pp.
3–19.
Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America
.
25.
Minuchin, P.
,
Brooks, A.
,
Colapinto, J.
,
Genijovich, E.
,
Minuchin, D.
and
Minuchin, S.
(1990) Training Manual for Foster Parents Based on an
Ecological Perspective on Foster Care.
New York: Family Studies
.
26.
Morton, T.
(1999) Group Preparation and Selection of Foster and Adopted
Families.
Atlantic, GA: Child Welfare Institute
.
27.
Mosek, A.
(1993)
‘Well-being and Parental Contact of Foster Children in Israel: A
Different Situation from the USA?’
, International Social Work36(3):
261–275
.
28.
Navo, K. M.
(1999)
‘What is Your Story?: Metaphors of Pain and Assistance’
, in Hebrew, Society and Welfare19(3):
283–301
.
29.
Padgett, D. K.
(1998) Qualitative Methods in Social Work Research: Challenges
and Rewards.
California: Sage
.
30.
Royse, D.
and
Thyer, B. A.
(1998) Program Evaluation: An Introduction, 2nd edn.Chicago: Nelson-Hall
.
31.
Sallebey, D.
(ed.) (1997) The Strengths Perspective in Social Work
Practice.
New York: Longman
.
32.
Simms, M. D.
and
Bolden, B. J.
(1991)
‘The Family Reunification Program: Facilitating Regular Contact
Among Foster Children, Biological Families and Foster Families’
, Child Welfare70(6):
679–690
.
33.
Terpstra, J.
(1987)
‘The Rich and Exacting Role of the Social Worker in Family Foster Care’
, Child and Adolescent Social Work4(3–4):
12–30
.
34.
Tiddy, G. S.
(1986)
‘Creative Cooperation Involving Biological Parents in Long Term Care’
, Child Welfare65(2):
221–227
.
