Objective: This article describes the first-year evaluation outcomes of a program developed to increase information technology access and skills among foster children and families within the context of a long-term foster care environment. Method: A sample of 34 foster families who received computers, Internet connection, and supportive services was compared with 30 foster families not in the program using survey methods and a posttest only design. Results: The results indicated after a year in the program, foster families increased their frequency of computer use, confidence in using computers and the Internet, and frequency of e-mail with social workers. Parents and foster children perceived the program to be useful in improving children’s technology skills, homework, grades, and interest in technology-related careers. Conclusion: The program appears to be successful in spite of lack of full implementation of the program model. Implications for future digital divide programs are discussed.
Ba, H., Tally, B., & Tsikalas, K. (2002). Children's emerging digital literacies: Investigating home computing in low- and middleincome families. Center for Children and Technology. Retrieved July 5, 2003, from www.edc.org/CCT/publications_report_summary.%20asp?numPubld=37
2.
Barbell, K., & Freundlich, M. (2001). Foster care today.Washington, DC: Casey Family Programs National Center for Resource Family Support.
3.
Beamish, A. (1999). Approaches to community computing: Bringing technology to low income groups. In D. Schö, B. Sanyal, & W. Mitchell (Eds.), High technology and low income communities (pp. 349-370). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4.
Becker, H. J. (2000). Who's wired and who's not: Children's access to and use of computer technology. The Future of Children, 10(2), 44-75.
5.
Blome,W.W. (1997). What happens to foster kids: Educational experiences of a random sample of foster care youth and a matched group of non-foster care youth. Child and Adolescent Social Work Journal, 14(1), 41-53.
6.
Bolt, D. B.,& Crawford, R. A. (2000). Digital divide: Computers and our children's future. New York: TV Books.
7.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
Finn, J., Kerman, B., & LeCornec, J. (2004). Building skills–building futures: Providing information technology to foster families. Families in Society, 85(2), 165-176.
9.
Graham, S. (2002). Bridging urban digital divides? Urban polarization and information and communications technologies (ICTs). Urban Studies, 39(1), 33-56.
10.
Holden, G., Barker, K., Meenaghan, T., & Rosenberg, G. (1999). Research self-efficacy: A new possibility for educational outcomes assessment. Journal of Social Work Education, 35, 463-476.
11.
Kerman, B. (2000). Foster care program needs assessment: Results of the foster parent and foster youth interview. New Haven, CT: Casey Family Services. Retrieved October 15, 2002, from:www.caseyfamilyservices.org/pdfs/foster_care_assessment.pdf
12.
Koss, F. A. (2001). Children falling into the digital divide. Journal of International Affairs, 55(1), 75-91.
13.
Larson, L. M., & Daniels, J. A. (1998). Review of the counseling self-efficacy literature. Counseling Psychologist, 26, 179-218.
14.
Lipsey, M. W., & Wilson, D. B. (1993). The efficacy of psychological, educational, and behavioral treatment: Confirmation from meta-analysis. American Psychologist, 48, 1181-1209.
15.
McDonald, T. P., Allen, R. I., Westerfelt, A., & Piliavin, I. (1996). Assessing the long-term effects of foster care. Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
16.
Mallon, G. P. (1998). After care, then where? Outcomes of an independent living program. Child Welfare, 77, 68-86.
17.
National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (2000). Falling through the Net: Toward digital inclusion. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved May 28, 2005, from www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/annualrpt/2001/2000annrpt.htm
18.
National Telecommunications and Information Administration. (2002). A nation online: How Americans are expanding their use of the Internet. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Commerce. Retrieved May 28, 2005, from www.ntia.doc.gov/ntiahome/dn
19.
Noble, L. S. (1997). The face of foster care. Educational Leadership, 54(7), 26-28.
20.
Resnick, M., Rusk, N., & Cooke, S. (1999). The computer clubhouse: Technological fluency in the inner city. In D. Schön, B. Sanyal, & W. Mitchell (Eds.), High technology and low income communities (pp. 263-287). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21.
Speak, S., & Graham, S. (1999). Service not included: Marginalised neighbourhoods, private service disinvestment, and compound social exclusion. Environment and Planning, 31, 1985-2001.
22.
Stock, E. (2001). Computers for youth: Why it makes sense to focus digital divide efforts on the home. Benton Foundation. Retrieved September 22, 2002, from www.benton.org/DigitalBeat/db022201.html
23.
Weinstein, E. (1960). The self-image of the foster child. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
24.
Woodward, E. H. (2000). Media in the home 2000: The fifth annual survey of parents and children. Philadelphia: Annenberg Public Policy Center, University of Pennsylvania.
