This study evaluates the top 100 hotel websites from Web Content Accessibility Guideline 2.0 based on conformance level AA to understand their compliance with the international accessibility standards for disabled people. The study utilizes an automatic online tool - TAW, to check the web accessibility of hotels. The findings demonstrate that the hotel websites have accessibility barriers that prevent disabled people from using the online facility, especially in the guidelines 1.1, 2.4, 4.1, 1.3 and 1.4. Additionally, the study has also discussed various theoretical and practical implications that can help promote inclusive tourism.
Acosta-VargasPAcostaTLuján-MoraS (2018) Challenges to assess accessibility in higher education websites: a comparative study of latin America universities. IEEE Access6: 36500–36508. DOI: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2848978.
2.
AgrawalGDumkaASinghM, et al. (2022) Assessing usability and accessibility of Indian tourism websites for visually impaired. Journal of Sensors2022: 4433013. DOI: 10.1155/2022/4433013.
3.
BuhalisDMichopoulouE (2011) Information-enabled tourism destination marketing: addressing the accessibility market. Current Issues in Tourism14(2): 145–168. DOI: 10.1080/13683501003653361.
4.
Domínguez VilaTAlén GonzálezEDarcyS (2018) Website accessibility in the tourism industry: an analysis of official national tourism organization websites around the world. Disability and Rehabilitation40(24): 2895–2906. DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1362709.
5.
Domínguez VilaTAlén GonzálezEDarcyS (2019) Accessible tourism online resources: a northern European perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism19(2): 140–156. DOI: 10.1080/15022250.2018.1478325.
6.
Domínguez VilaTAlén GonzálezEDarcyS (2020) Accessibility of tourism websites: the level of countries’ commitment. Universal Access in the Information Society19(2): 331–346. DOI: 10.1007/s10209-019-00643-4.
7.
EichhornVMillerGMichopoulouE, et al. (2008) Enabling access to tourism through information schemes?Annals of Tourism Research35(1): 189–210. DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2007.07.005.
EusébioCTeixeiraLTeixeiraP, et al. (2023) The state of web accessibility for tourists with disabilities: a comparative study between different tourism supply agents. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology18(1): 17–29. DOI: 10.1080/17483107.2021.1941313.
10.
InalYRızvanoğluKYesiladaY (2019) Web accessibility in Turkey: awareness, understanding and practices of user experience professionals. Universal Access in the Information Society18(2): 387–398. DOI: 10.1007/s10209-017-0603-3.
11.
IsmailASinghRSibiPS, et al. (2020) Universal accessibility issues: an assessment statement of online travel aggregators’ (OTAs) websites towards accessible tourism. The Communications28(1): 182–217.
12.
LawR (2019) Evaluation of hotel websites: progress and future developments (invited paper for ‘luminaries’ special issue of international journal of hospitality management). International Journal of Hospitality Management76: 2–9. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.06.005.
13.
LewthwaiteS (2014) Web accessibility standards and disability: developing critical perspectives on accessibility. Disability and Rehabilitation36(16): 1375–1383. DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2014.938178.
14.
Máñez-CarvajalCCervera-MéridaJFFernández-PiquerasR (2021) Web accessibility evaluation of top-ranking university web sites in Spain, Chile and Mexico. Universal Access in the Information Society20(1): 179–184. DOI: 10.1007/s10209-019-00702-w.
15.
Martin-FuentesEMostafa-ShaalanSMellinasJP (2021) Accessibility in inclusive tourism? Hotels distributed through online channels. Societies11(2): 34.
16.
ParkKHaJ (2022) Examination of web-accessibility in the restaurant industry. Journal of Foodservice Business Research26(1): 1–20. DOI: 10.1080/15378020.2022.2051403.
17.
ParkKJungS (2022) Designing inclusive websites for people with disabilities as part of an event tourism strategic planning process. Journal of Convention & Event Tourism23(2): 129–153.
18.
ParkKJeonHParkSB (2022) Disability e-inclusion for accessible tourism websites. Current Issues in Tourism. 25(22): 1–8. DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2022.2106195.
19.
QiaoGDingLZhangL, et al. (2022) Accessible tourism: a bibliometric review (2008–2020). Tourism Review77(3): 713–730. DOI: 10.1108/TR-12-2020-0619.
20.
RandleMDolnicarS (2019) Enabling people with impairments to use airbnb. Annals of Tourism Research76: 278–289. DOI: 10.1016/j.annals.2019.04.015.
21.
Rubio-EscuderosLGarcía-AndreuHMichopoulouE, et al. (2021) Perspectives on experiences of tourists with disabilities: implications for their daily lives and for the tourist industry. Tourism Recreation Research: 1–15. DOI: 10.1080/02508281.2021.1981071.
22.
SinghRIsmailA (2020) Easy to read (E2R) and access for all (A4A): a step to determine the understandability and accessibility of websites. Applications in Ubiquitous Computing. Berlin, Germany: Springer, 13–35.
23.
SinghRSibiPS (2020) Evaluation of hotel websites for disabled people: an accessibility approach. Metabolites10(12): 258–271. DOI: 10.34218/IJARET.11.12.2020.031.
24.
SinghRSibiPS (2021) Accessibility and readability of website: an analysis of online travel aggregators (OTAs) of India. E-Review of Tourism Research18(5): 692–716.
25.
SinghRIsmailAPsS, et al. (2020) Compliance of accessibility in tourism websites: a pledge towards disability. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Insights4(3): 263–281. DOI: 10.1108/JHTI-05-2020-0092.
26.
SinghRSibiPSYostE, et al. (2021) Tourism and disability: a bibliometric review. Tourism Recreation Research48(2): 1–17. DOI: 10.1080/02508281.2021.1959768.
27.
SteinMALazarJ (2021) Accessible Technology and the Developing World. London, UK: Oxford University Press.
28.
TeixeiraPEusébioCTeixeiraL (2021) Website accessibility in the hospitality industry: a study in the central region of Portugal. International Journal of Tourism Policy11(3): 222–246.
29.
TeixeiraPEusébioCTeixeiraL (2022) How diverse is hotel website accessibility? A study in the central region of Portugal using web diagnostic tools. Tourism and Hospitality Research22(2): 180–195.
30.
TingPHWangSTBauDY, et al. (2013) Website evaluation of the top 100 hotels using advanced content analysis and eMICA model. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly54(3): 284–293. DOI: 10.1177/1938965512471892.
WilliamsRRattrayRGrimesA (2007) Online accessibility and information needs of disabled tourists: a three country hotel sector analysis. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research8(2): 157–171.
