Organisations increasingly use the internet and web to communicate with the marketplace. Indeed, the hotel industry seems particularly suited to the use of these technologies. Many sites are not accessible to large segments of the disabled community, however, or to individuals using particular hard and softwares. Identifying the competitive and legal mandates for website accessibility, the study looks at the accessibility of UK-based hotel websites. Utilising the accessibility software, Bobby, as well as making some additional manual accessibility checks, the study finds disappointingly low levels of website accessibility. If organisations want to make more effective use of the web then they need to ensure that their web pages are designed from the outside-in — from the user's perspective.
CravenJ. (2000) ‘Electronic access for all: Awareness in creating accessible web sites for the university library’, Disability and Information Systems in Higher Education (DISinHE). Available at: <http://www.disinhe.ac.uk/library/article.aso?id=34> (Accessed 18.11.02).
5.
DavisJ. J. (2002) ‘Disenfranchising the disabled: The inaccessibility of internet-based health information’, Journal of Health Communication, 7, 355–367.
DholakiaU. M.RegoL. L. (1998) ‘What makes commercial web pages popular?’European Journal of Marketing, 32, 7/8, 724–736.
8.
GrewalI.JoyS.LewisJ.SwalesK.WoodfieldK. (2002) ‘Disabled for life? Attitudes towards, and experiences of, disability in Britain’, National Centre for Social Research on behalf of the Department for Work and Pensions, HMSO.
Jackson-SanbornE.Odess-HarnishK. KerriWarrenN. (2002) ‘Web site accessibility: A study of six genres’, Library Hi Tech, 20, 3, 308–317.
11.
KaydoC. (1999) ‘Improving your visibility on the web’, Sales and Marketing Management, 151, 3, 86.
12.
KellyB. (2002) ‘Web watch: An accessibility analysis of UK university entry points’, Ariadne, 33. Available at: <http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue33/web-watch/> (Accessed 13.11.02).
13.
LillyE. B.Van FleetC. (2000) ‘Wired but not connected: Accessibility of academic library home pages’, The Reference Librarian, 67/68, 5–28.
14.
O'ConnorP.FrewA. J. (2002) ‘The future of hotel electronic distribution’Cornell Hotel and Restaurant Administration Quarterly, 43, 3, 33–45.
15.
RoyM. C.DewitO.AubertB. A. (2001) ‘The impact of interface usability on trust in Web retailers’, Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 11, 5, 388–398.
SchmetzkeA. (2001) ‘Web accessibility at university libraries and library schools’, Library Hi Tech, 19, 1. 35–49.
19.
SloanM. (2001) ‘Web accessibility and the DDA’, The Journal of Information, Law and Technology (JILT), 2. Available at: <http://elj.warwick.ac.uk/jilt/01-02/sloan.htm> (Accessed 25.11.02).
20.
SullivanT.MatsonR. (2000) ‘Barriers to use: Usability and content accessibility on the web's most popular sites’, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Universal Usability, Arlington, Virginia, USA, pp. 139–144.
World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) (2002) ‘Web accessibility initiative — Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0’. Available at w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/ (Accessed 22.11.02).
24.
WilliamsR.RattrayR. (2003) ‘An assessment of web accessibility of UK accountancy firms’, Managerial Auditing Journal, 18, 9, 710–717.
25.
YuH. (2002) ‘Web accessibility and the law: Recommendations for implementation’Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 20, 4, 406–419.
