The article attempts to elucidate tensionless ethnography against the backdrop of three contemporary processes: STS ethnography, innovation policies, and the Mode 2 society. An ethnographic approach was utilized to generate the initial problem of the ‘tensionless’, which is continuously resolved by close readings of research literature and documents on innovation policies. Tensionless ethnography is described as a method in which the conceptual objects and attitude are conceived as similar among the ethnographer and the Others. As the academic world of ethnography becomes an assimilated part of the world of policy and industry, it could be argued that we are about to lose a self-reflexive qualitative approach. Therefore, it seems urgent to re-establish an ethnographic world in which we can exercise critical inquires in innovation policy.
AgarM (1987) Speaking of Ethnography.
London:
SAGE.
2.
AgarM (2004)
We have met the Other and we’re all nonlinear: Ethnography as a nonlinear dynamic system.Complexity10(2): 16–24.
3.
AgarM (2013) The Lively Science: Remodelling Human Social Research.
Minneapolis:
Mill City Press.
4.
AkrichMCallonMLatourB (2002a)
The key to success in innovation, Part I: The art of interessement.International Journal of Innovation Management6(2): 187–206.
5.
AkrichMCallonMLatourB (2002b)
The key to success in innovation, Part II: The art of choosing good spokespersons.International Journal of Innovation Management6(2): 207–225.
6.
BerlinerDLambekMShwederRIrvineRAlbertP (2016)
Anthropology and the study of contradictions.Hau: Journal of Ethnographic Theory6(1): 1–27.
7.
BourdieuP (1991) Kultur och kritik.
Uddevalla:
Daidalos.
8.
CallonMBartheYLascoumesP (2011) Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy.
Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
9.
CliffordJMarcusGE (2010 [1986]) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography.
Berkeley:
University of California Press.
Friberg T (2017) From ethnocentrism to policy-centrism. Ethnography and Education. DOI: 10.1080/17457823.2017.1365254
17.
Friberg T (2018) The phenomenon of collaboration in a life science network. Journal of Organizational Ethnography. DOI: 10.1108/JOE-03-2017-0013
18.
Friberg T and Englander M (2019) Taking Policy for Granted in the Context of Scientific Innovation. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 18, 1–7.
19.
GeertzC (1988) Works and Lives.
Cambridge:
Polity.
20.
GeertzC (2000) Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology.
New York:
Basic Books.
21.
GibbonMLimogesCNowotnyHSchwartzmanSScottPTrowM (2010 [1994]) The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies.
London:
SAGE.
22.
GuptaAFergusonJ (1997) Anthropological Locations: Boundaries and Grounds of a Field Science.
Berkeley:
University of California Press.
23.
HeadlandTPikeKHarrisM (eds) (1990) Emics and Etics: The Insider/Outsider Debate.
London:
SAGE.
24.
IngoldT (2007) Lines: A Brief History.
London:
Routledge.
25.
KempinskyPSandredJSjögrenD (2011) Hundra år av erfarenhet – Lärdomar från VINNVÄXT 2001–2011 [Hundred years of experience — Learning from VINNVÄXT 2001-2011]. VINNOVA Rapport: VR 2011:01. Available at: http://www.vinnova.se/upload/EPiStorePDF/vr-11-01.pdf.
26.
LatourB (1990)
Postmodern? No, simply amodern! Steps towards an anthropology of science.Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science21: 145–171.
27.
LatourB (1993) We Have Never Been Modern.
Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press.
LebnerA (2017) Redescribing Relations: Strahernian Conversations on Ethnography, Knowledge and Politics.
New York:
Berghan Books.
30.
LexS (2013) Innovation i Praksis – Omstilling til markedsorientering i Post Danmark [Innovation as praxis – adaption to market orientation in Post Denmark].
Copenhagen:
Academic Books.
31.
MarcusG (1998) Ethnography through Thick and Thin.
Princeton:
Princeton University Press.
32.
MarcusGFischerM (1986) Anthropology as Cultural Critique.
Chicago:
University of Chicago Press.
33.
MolA (2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice.
Durham:
Duke University Press.
34.
Näringsdepartementet (2001/02) En politik för tillväxt och livskraft i hela landet [A policy for growth and vitality throughout the whole nation]. Available at: http://www.regeringen.se/content/1/c4/21/04/e3e0daba.pdf (accessed 20 May 2018).
35.
NowotnyH (2008) Insatiable Curiosity: Innovation in a Fragile Future.
Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press.
36.
NowotnyH (2016) The Cunning of Uncertainty.
Cambridge:
Polity Press.
37.
NowotnyHScottPGibbonsM (2001) Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty.
London:
Polity Press.
SalzmanPC (2002)
On reflexivity.American Anthropologist104(3): 805–813.
41.
ScholteB (1972) Towards reflexive and critical anthropology. In: HymesD (ed.) Reinventing Anthropology.
New York:
Pantheon, 430–457.
42.
SchutzA (1999) Den sociala världens fenomenologi [Phenomenology of the Social World].
Uddevalla:
Daidalos.
43.
StockingWG (1984) Observers Observed: Essays on Ethnographic Fieldwork.
Madison:
University Wisconsin Press.
44.
StrathernM (2000) Audit Culture: Anthropological Studies in Accountability, Ethics and the Academy.
London:
Routledge.
45.
StrathernM (2004) Commons and Borderlands: Working Papers on Interdisciplinarity, Accountability and the Flow of Knowledge.
Oxon:
Sean Kingston Publishing.
46.
StrathernM (2005) Kinship, Law and the Unexpected: Relatives Are Always a Surprise.
Cambridge:
University of Cambridge.
47.
StrathernM (2006)
A community of critics? Thoughts on new knowledge.Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute12(1): 191–209.
48.
StrykerRGonzalezR (2016) Up, Down, and Sideways: Anthropologists Trace the Pathway of Power.
London:
Berghahn Books.
49.
VaabenN (2014) Reconsidering Innovation. Paper presented at Department of Anthropology, University of Copenhagen. September.
Denmark:
Business and Organizational Research Group.
50.
WelzG (2003)
The cultural swirl: Anthropological perspectives on innovation.Global Networks3(3): 255–270.
