With reference to two different projects examining North American Christianities, this symposium contribution explores opportunities for critique when conducting fieldwork. Drawing from observations made by E. E. Evans-Pritchard, I suggest that critique is most productive when it uses the perspective and position of one’s interlocutors as its point of departure.
DulinJ (2015)
Reversing rupture: Evangelicals’ practice of Jewish rituals and processes of Protestant inclusion.Anthropological Quarterly88: 601–634.
2.
Evans-PritchardEE (1937) Witchcraft, Oracles, and Magic Among the Azande.
Oxford:
Clarendon Press.
3.
FitzgeraldT (2000) The Ideology of Religious Studies.
New York:
Oxford University Press.
4.
Goldstein WS, King R and Boyarin J (2016) Critical theory of religion vs. critical religion. Critical Research on Religion 4(1): 3–7.
5.
KaellH (2016)
Under the law of god: Mimesis and mimetic discipleship among Jewish-affinity Christians. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute22(3): 496–515. Washington, DC.
