This editorial discusses the place of critique at different stages in research and writing. It evokes Foucault’s conception of critique as transformative and draws from the symposium in this issue examining the role of critique in anthropology to shift the conversation to the question of when critique occurs. The editorial advocates for the notion of critique as a competency that is dependent upon context.
ButlerJ (2002) What is critique? An essay on Foucault’s virtue. In: IngramD (ed) The Political: Readings in Continental PhilosophyLondon:
Basil Blackwell, pp.212–228.
2.
FoucaultM (2007) What is critique? In: LotringerS (ed) The Politics of Truth.
New York:
Semiotext(e), pp.41–81.
3.
GoldsteinWSKingR andBoyarinJ (2016)
Critical theory of religion vs. critical religion. Critical Research on Religion4(1): 3–7.
4.
GoldsteinWSKingR andBoyarinJ (2017)
On a balanced critique: (Or on the limits of critique). Critical Research on Religion5(1): 3–8.
5.
McCarthyBK (2002) Writing about ‘the other’, revisited. In: SpickardJVLandresJS andMcGuireMB (eds) Personal Knowledge and Beyond: Reshaping the Ethnography of Religion.
New York:
New York University Press, pp.127–133.
6.
PrattML (1986) Fieldwork in common places. In: CliffordJ andMarcusGE (eds) Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography.
Berkeley:
University of California Press, pp.27–50.
7.
WatersM (dir) (2004) Mean Girls.
Hollywood:
Paramount Pictures.
