This article empirically investigates the impact of globalization on voting behavior. Specifically, combining individual-level data from the first nine waves of the European Social Survey, party-level information from the Comparative Manifesto Project, and country-level data from Eurostat, we study the individual determinants of the vote for trade protectionist parties. Our findings show, firstly, that protectionist parties mainly receive electoral support from less-educated voters, unemployed individuals, and members of labor unions. Secondly, we test the compensation principle using a macro measure of a country's compensation potential and find, contrary to expectations, no significant evidence that a greater potential to mitigate the labor market adjustment costs resulting from economic openness deters the propensity to vote for protectionist parties in national elections.
American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organization (2021) Trade. Available athttps://aflcio.org/issues/trade (accessed on 27 October 2022).
5.
AmitiMReddingSWeinsteinD (2019) The impact of the 2018 tariffs on prices and welfare. Journal of Economic Perspectives33(4): 187–210.
6.
AutorDDornDHansonG (2016) The China shock: Learning from labor-market adjustment to large changes in trade. Annual Review of Economics8: 205–240.
7.
BakerA (2005) Who wants to go global? Consumer tastes and labor markets in a theory of trade policy beliefs. American Journal of Political Science49(4): 924–938.
8.
Ballard-RosaCMalikMScheveK (2021) The economic origins of authoritarian values: Evidence from local trade shocks in the United Kingdom. Comparative Political Studies54(13): 2267–2441.
ClineW (1997) Trade and Income Distribution. Washington DC: Institute for International Economics.
21.
CoendersMScheepersP (1998) Support for ethnic discrimination in the Netherlands, 1979–1993: Effects of period, cohort, and individual characteristics. European Sociological Review14(4): 405–422.
22.
ColantoneIStanigP (2018a) Global competition and brexit. American Political Science Review112(2): 201–218.
23.
ColantoneIStanigP (2018b) The trade origins of economic nationalism: Import competition and voting behavior in Western Europe. American Journal of Political Science62(4): 936–953.
FacchiniGMaydaA (2009) Does the welfare state affect individual attitudes towards immigrants? Evidence across countries. Review of Economics and Statistics91(2): 295–314.
GarrettGMitchellD (2001) Globalization, government spending and taxation. European Journal of Political Research39(2): 145–177.
34.
GelmanA (2008) Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Statistics in Medicine27(15): 2865–2873.
35.
GomilaR (2021) Logistic or linear? Estimating casual effects of experimental treatments on binary outcomes using regression analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General150(4): 700–709.
36.
GoosMManningASalomonsA (2014) Explaining job polarization: Routine-biased technological change and offshoring. American Economic Review104(8): 2509–2526.
37.
GrossmanGHelpmanE (1994) Protection for sale. American Economic Review84(4): 833–885.
HainmuellerJHiscoxM (2006) Learning to love globalization: Education and individual attitudes toward international trade. International Organization60(2): 469–498.
40.
HaysJEhrlichSPeinhardtC (2005) Government spending and public support for trade in the OECD: An empirical test of the embedded liberalism thesis. International Organization59(2): 473–494.
HoboltSDe VriesC (2016) Turning against the union? The impact of the crisis on the eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European parliament elections. Electoral Studies44: 504–514.
43.
HopkinsD (2010) Politicized places: Explaining where and when immigrants provoke local opposition. American Political Science Review104(1): 40–60.
44.
KapsteinE (2000) Winners and losers in the global economy. International Organization54(2): 359–384.
45.
KeeHNeaguCNicitaA (2013) Is protectionism on the rise? Assessing national trade policies during the crisis of 2008. Review of Economics and Statistics95(1): 342–346.
46.
KindlebergerC (1975) The rise of free trade in Western Europe: 1820–1875. Journal of Economic History33(1): 20–55.
47.
KonoDLoveG (2007) Who rides the storm: Political institutions and trade adjustment. Business and Politics9(1): 1–26.
48.
KuziemkoILonguet-Marx, et al. (2023) “Compensate the losers?” Economic policy and partisan realignment in the US. Available at: https://www.nber.org/papers/w31794 (accessed 20 February 2024).
LuttrellC (1978) Imports and jobs: The observed and the unobserved. Review of the Federal Reserve Bank of St Louis60(6): 2–10.
54.
MacManusTSchaurG (2016) The effect of import competition on worker health. Journal of International Economics102: 160–172.
55.
MansfieldEDMutzDC (2009) Support for free trade: Self-interest, sociotropic policies and out-group anxiety. International Organization63(3): 425–457.
56.
MargalitY (2011) Costly jobs: Trade-related layoffs, government compensation, and voting in U.S. Elections. American Political Science Review105(1): 166–188.
57.
MaydaA (2008) Why are people more pro-trade than pro-immigration?Economic Letters101(3): 160–163.
58.
MaydaARodrikD (2005) Why are some people (and countries) more protectionist than others?European Economic Review49(6): 1393–1430.
59.
MillJS (1980) Principios de Economía Política. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.
60.
MilnerH (2021) Voting for populism in Europe: Globalization, technological change, and the extreme right. Comparative Political Studies54(13): 2286–2320.
61.
MilnerHJudkinsB (2004) Partisanship, trade policy, and globalization: Is there a left-right divide on trade policy?International Studies Quarterly49(1): 95–119.
62.
MughanABeanCMcAllisterI (2003) Economic globalization, job insecurity and the populist reaction. Electoral Studies22(4): 617–633.
63.
MughanALacyD (2002) Economic performance, job insecurity and electoral choice. British Journal of Political Science32(3):513–533.
64.
OECD (1985) Costs and Benefits of Protection. Paris: OECD.
WalkerS (2010) Globalization and the welfare state: Testing the micro foundations of the compensation hypothesis. International Studies Quarterly54(2): 403–426.
80.
WallersteinM (1987) Unemployment, collective bargaining, and the demand for protection. American Journal of Political Science31(4): 729–752.
WoodA (1994) North- South Trade, Employment, and Inequality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
