Was India Right in Not Joining RCEP? A Cost

Abstract

India dropped out of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP)—which included the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) countries, China, South Korea, New Zealand, Japan and Australia—after negotiating for almost seven years in November 2018 on the grounds of national interest and also that free trade agreements (FTAs) did not amount to free trade and led to more trade diversion than trade creation. The cost and benefit of a regional agreement depend on the amount of trade creation with respect to trade diversion (Panagriya, 2000). This study tries to examine India’s concerns and, at the same time, highlights the cost of not joining RCEP. India’s trade deficit with 11 out of the 15 RCEP nations has been a major cause of concern. Unfavourable trade balance, concerns about the impact on dairy sector, economic slowdown, past experience with FTA’s, China factor, data localisation, rules of origin and the experience of ASEAN countries with Sino-FTA have been some of the reasons behind India’s decision to opt out of this mega multilateral agreement. Also, bilateral trade agreements with some RCEP countries such as Japan, Malaysia, Singapore, Thailand and South Korea were operational. A multilateral trade agreement with ASEAN countries was very much in place. So, trade between India and 12 of the RCEP member countries would not have changed much after India’s inclusion in the RCEP. The impact of lower tariffs would have been evident for the remaining three countries: China, Australia and New Zealand. Furthermore, there was fear of a massive surge in imports of manufactures from China and dairy imports from Australia and New Zealand. This study also examines the long-term impact of this decision and if India has missed out on becoming a part of the global value chain and gaining greater market access in the Asia-Pacific region. India’s policy of import substitution and protectionism did not capitulate desired results in the past. Hence, a critical evaluation of India’s decision and some validation on her concerns and fears have been done.

Keywords

RCEP FTA’s trade deficit China trade agreements ASEAN trade liberalisation protectionism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

ADBI. (2019). Different paths to economic integration in Europe & Asia. Asian Development Bank Institute working paper https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/546911/adbi-wp1063.pdf.

Alam

M. I.

(2015). Indo-Asean trade relation: An analysis. Journal of International Economics, 6(1), 792–976.

Antweiler

, Copeland

B. R.

, & Taylor

M. S.

(2001). Is free trade good for the environment? American Economic Review, 91(4), 877–908.

Blake

(2020). How bright are the prospects for UK trade and prosperity post-Brexit? Journal of Self-Governance and Management Economics, 8(1), 7–99.

Chandra

A. C.

(2008). Indonesia and the ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: Nationalists and regional integration strategy. Lexington Books.

Chang

, & Winters

L. A.

(2002). How regional blocs affect excluded countries: The price effects of MERCOSUR. American Economic Review, 92(4), 889–904.

Das

R. U.

(2009). Regional economic integration in South Asia: Prospects and challenges (Discussion paper #157). Research and Information System for Developing Countries.

Fouda

R. A. N.

(2012). Protectionism & free trade: A country’s glory or doom? International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 3(5), 351.

Gould

D. M.

, Ruffin

R. J.

, & Woodbridge

G. L.

(1993, December). The theory and practice of free trade. Economic Review, 1–16.

10.

Grossman

G. M.

, & Krueger

A. B.

(1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement (Working Paper No. 3914). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914

11.

Helpman

(1995). The size of regions. Foerder Institute for Economic Research.

12.

Irwin

D. A.

(1998). Against the tide: An intellectual history of free trade. Princeton University Press.

13.

Jain

(2020a). Revealed comparative advantage index: An analysis of regional comprehensive economic partnership from Indian perspective. Academy of Marketing Studies Journal, 24(4), 1–7.

14.

Jain

(2020b). An empirical study of the impact of exchange rate management on bilateral trade between USA & China. The Empirical Economics Letters, 19(6), 610–612.

15.

Krishna

(2013). Preferential trade agreements and the world trade system: A multilateralist view. In Feenstra

R. C.

, & Taylor

A. M.

(Eds.), Globalization in an age of crisis: Multilateral economic cooperation in the twenty-first century (pp. 131–160). University of Chicago Press.

16.

Krugman

P. R.

(1987). Is free trade passé? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 1(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.1.2.131

17.

Krugman

P. R.

(1993). The narrow and broad arguments for free trade. The American Economic Review, 83(2), 362–366. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9396.1993.tb00009.x

18.

Magee

C. S.

(2003). Endogenous preferential trade agreements: An empirical analysis. Contributions in Economic Analysis & Policy, 2(1), 1–17.

19.

Panagriya

(2000). Preferential trade liberialisation: The traditional theory and new development. Journal of Economic Literature, 38(2), 287–331.

20.

Pomfret

(2019). Different paths to economic integration in Europe and Asia (Working Paper Series No. 1063). Asian Development Bank Institute.

21.

Saraswat

V. K.

, Priya

, & Ghosh

(2018). A note on Free Trade Agreements and their costs. NITI Aayog.

22.

SBI Ecowrap. (2019). Building capabilities must for a fruitful RCEP deal for India (Issue No. 50, FY20).

23.

Solís

, & Katada

S. N.

(2009). Explaining FTA proliferation: A policy diffusion framework. In Solís

, Stallings

, & Katada

S. N.

(Eds.), Competitive Regionalism (pp. 1–24). Palgrave Macmillan.

24.

Sridharan

(1997). India and Southeast Asia in the 1990s. In ISEAS (Ed.), Southeast Asian Affairs 1997 (pp. 46–64). ISEAS Publishing.

25.

Stencel

(2020). Free trade versus fair trade. Denver Journal of International Law & Policy, 36(3), 7.

26.

Subramanian

, & Felman

(2019). India’s great slowdown: What happened? What’s the way out? (Working Paper No. 370). Center for International Development, Harvard University.

27.

Viner

(1950). Full employment at whatever cost. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64(3), 385–407.

28.

Wonnacott

, & Lutz

(1989). Is there a case for free trade areas? Institute of International Economics.

29.

World Bank. (2020). Global economic prospects: Slow growth, policy changes.

Was India Right in Not Joining RCEP? A Cost–Benefit Analysis

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References