This study is motivated by the puzzle of diminishing gains in the European Union budget bargaining for governments with a Eurosceptic domestic audience, even as Euroscepticism is increasingly represented in national legislatures. Engaging literature on fiscal federalism in the European Union and the institutionalist politics of its budgetary process, we argue that European integration diminishes the ability of member states’ governments to leverage Euroscepticism to extract concessions from the European Union budget. This is because Euroscepticism is becoming less exceptional, and greater differentiation in integration reduces the will to reward those seen as systematically less committed to integration. Running panel-corrected standard errors regressions on Operating Budgetary Balances since 1977, we find that in intergovernmental bargaining, domestic popular Euroscepticism is an advantage, but parliamentary Euroscepticism is not.
AksoyD (2010) Who gets what, when and how revisited. European Union Politics11(2): 171–194.
2.
ArmingeonK (2021) Fiscal solidarity: The conditional role of political knowledge. European Union Politics22(1): 133–154.
3.
ArreguiJThomsonR (2014) Domestic adjustment costs, interdependence and dissent in the Council of the European Union. European Journal of Political Research53(4): 692–708.
4.
BailerSMattilaMSchneiderG (2015) Money makes the EU go round: The objective foundations of conflict in the council of ministers. Journal of Common Market Studies53(3): 437–456.
5.
BailerSSchneiderG (2006) Nash versus schelling? In: ThomsonRStokmanFNAchenCHKönigT (eds) The European Union Decides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 153–177.
6.
BechtelMMHainmuellerJMargalitY (2014) Preferences for international redistribution. American Journal of Political Science58(4): 835–856.
7.
BenedettoGHøylandB (2007) The EU annual budgetary procedure. Journal of Common Market Studies45(3): 565–587.
8.
Blom-HansenJ (2005) Principals, agents and the implementation of EU cohesion policy. Journal of European Public Policy12(4): 624–648.
9.
BouvetFDall’erbaS (2010) European Regional structural funds: How large is the influence of politics on the allocation process?Journal of Common Market Studies48(3): 501–528.
10.
CharronN (2016) Explaining the allocation of regional structural funds. European Union Politics17(4): 638–659.
11.
CiorneiIRecchiE (2017) At the source of European solidarity: Assessing the effects of cross-border practices and political attitudes. Journal of Common Market Studies55(3): 468–485.
12.
CitiM (2015) European Union Budget politics: Explaining stability and change in spending allocations. European Union Politics16(2): 260–280.
13.
CrombezCHøylandB (2015) The budgetary procedure in the European Union and the implications of the Treaty of Lisbon. European Union Politics16(1): 67–89.
14.
CrossJP (2013) Everyone’s a winner (almost). European Union Politics14(1): 70–94.
15.
DanajALazányiKBilanS (2018) Euroscepticism and populism in Hungary. Journal of International Studies11(1): 240–247.
16.
De VriesCEHoboltS (2020) Political Entrepreneurs. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
17.
DegnerHLeuffenD (2019) Franco-German cooperation and the rescuing of the Eurozone. European Union Politics20(1): 89–108.
18.
DellmuthLMStoffelMF (2012) Distributive politics and intergovernmental transfers: The local allocation of European Union structural funds. European Union Politics13(3): 413–433.
19.
European Commission (2019) EU Budget 2018. Luxembourg.
20.
FinkeD (2017) Underneath the culture of consensus: Transparency, credible commitments and voting in the council of ministers. European Union Politics18(3): 339–361.
21.
FinkeDBailerS (2019) Crisis bargaining in the European Union: Formal rules or market pressure?European Union Politics20(1): 109–133.
22.
FranchinoFKayserMWratilP (2022) Electoral competitiveness and responsiveness: Rational anticipation in the EU council. Journal of European Public Policy29(1): 42–60.
23.
FranchinoFSegattiP (2019) Public opinion on the eurozone fiscal union: Evidence from survey experiments in Italy. Journal of European Public Policy26(1): 126–148.
24.
FriedenJWalterS (2019) Analyzing inter-state negotiations in the Eurozone crisis and beyond. European Union Politics20(1): 134–151.
25.
GenoveseFSchneiderG (2020) Smoke with fire: Financial crises and the demand for parliamentary oversight in the European Union. Review of International Organizations15(3): 633–665.
26.
GolubJ (2012) How the European Union does not work: National bargaining success in the council of ministers. Journal of European Public Policy19(9): 1294–1315.
27.
GuidiMGuardiancichI (2018) Intergovernmental or supranational integration? A quantitative analysis of pension recommendations in the European SemesterEuropean Union Politics19(4): 684–706.
28.
HägeFM (2017) The scheduling power of the EU council presidency. Journal of European Public Policy24(5): 695–713.
29.
HagemannSBailerSHerzogA (2019) Signals to their parliaments? Governments’ use of votes and policy statements in the EU CouncilJournal of Common Market Studies57(3): 634–650.
30.
HagemannSHoboltSBWratilC (2017) Government responsiveness in the European Union: Evidence from council voting. Comparative Political Studies50(6): 850–876.
31.
HagemannSHøylandB (2008) Parties in the council?Journal of European Public Policy15(8): 1205–1221.
32.
HoboltSWratilC (2020) Contestation and responsiveness in EU council deliberations. Journal of European Public Policy27(3): 362–381.
33.
HosliMOMattilaMUriotM (2011) Voting in the council of the European Union after the 2004 enlargement. Journal of Common Market Studies49(6): 1249–1270.
34.
HugSKönigT (2002) In view of ratification: Governmental preferences and domestic constraints at the Amsterdam intergovernmental conference. International Organization56(2): 447–476.
35.
HuheNNaurinDThomsonR (2018) The evolution of political networks: Evidence from the council of the European Union. European Union Politics19(1): 25–51.
36.
KanthakLSpiesDC (2018) Why support international redistribution?European Union Politics19(1): 97–118.
37.
KauppiHWidgrénM (2004) What determines EU decision making?Economic Policy19(39): 222–266.
38.
KemmerlingABodensteinT (2006) Partisan politics in regional redistribution. European Union Politics7(3): 373–392.
39.
KleiderHStoeckelF (2019) The politics of international redistribution: Explaining public support for fiscal transfers in the EU. European Journal of Political Research58(1): 4–29.
40.
KönigT (2018) Still the century of intergovernmentalism? Partisan ideology, two-level bargains and technocratic governance in the post-maastricht EraJournal of Common Market Studies56(6): 1240–1262.
41.
KönigTJungeD (2011) Conflict resolution in the council by linkage of commission proposals. In: DehousseR (ed) The ‘Community Method’. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.76–88.
42.
LehnerTWasserfallenF (2019) Political conflict in the reform of the Eurozone. European Union Politics20(1): 45–64.
43.
LeruthBLordC (eds) (2017) Differentiated Integration in the European Union. London: Routledge.
44.
LundgrenMBailerSDellmuthLM, et al. (2019) Bargaining success in the reform of the eurozone. European Union Politics20(1): 65–88.
45.
MarianoNSchneiderCJ (2022) Euroscepticism and bargaining success in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy29(1): 61–77.
46.
NovakS (2013) The silence of ministers: Consensus and blame avoidance in the council of the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies51(6): 1091–1107.
47.
OztasBKreppelA (2022) Power or luck?Journal of Common Market Studies. 60(2): 408–426.
48.
PircherBFarjamM (2021) Oppositional voting in the council of the EU between 2010 and 2019: Evidence for differentiated politicisation. European Union Politics22(2): 472–494.
RauhCDe WildeP (2018) The opposition deficit in EU accountability: Evidence from over 20 years of plenary debate in four member states. European Journal of Political Research57(1): 194–216.
51.
RoddenJ (2002) Strength in numbers?European Union Politics3(2): 151–175.
52.
SchimmelfennigF (2015) Liberal intergovernmentalism and the Euro area crisis. Journal of European Public Policy22(2): 177–195.
53.
SchimmelfennigF (2016) A differentiated leap forward: Spillover, path-dependency, and graded membership in European banking regulation. West European Politics39(3): 483–502.
54.
SchimmelfennigFLeuffenDRittbergerB (2015) The European Union as a system of differentiated integration. Journal of European Public Policy22(6): 764–782.
55.
SchimmelfennigFWinzenT (2014) Instrumental and constitutional differentiation in the European Union. Journal of Common Market Studies52(2): 354–370.
56.
SchimmelfennigFWinzenT (2019) Grand theories, differentiated integration. Journal of European Public Policy. 26(8): 1172–1192.
57.
SchimmelfennigFWinzenT (2020) Ever Looser Union?Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58.
SchneiderC (2009) Conflict, Negotiations and EU Enlargement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59.
SchneiderC (2013) Globalizing electoral politics: political competence and distributional bargaining in the European Union. World Politics65(3): 452–490.
60.
SchneiderC (2018) The Responsive Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
61.
SchneiderCJSlantchevBL (2018) The domestic politics of international cooperation: Germany and the European debt crisis. International Organization72(1): 1–31.
62.
SchraffD (2014) Buying turnout or rewarding loyalists?European Union Politics15(2): 277–288.
63.
SeikelD (2016) Flexible austerity and supranational autonomy. The reformed excessive deficit procedure and the asymmetry between liberalization and social regulation in the EU. Journal of Common Market Studies54(6): 1398–1416.
64.
ThomsonR (2011) Resolving Controversy in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
65.
VeenT (2011) The dimensionality and nature of conflict in European Union politics: On the characteristics of intergovernmental decision-making. European Union Politics12(1): 65–86.
66.
VolkensAKrauseWLehmannP, et al. (2018) The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB).
67.
WinzenT (2020) Government Euroscepticism and differentiated integration. Journal of European Public Policy27(12): 1819–1837.
68.
WratilC (2018) Modes of government responsiveness in the European Union: Evidence from council negotiation positions. European Union Politics19(1): 52–74.
69.
WratilC (2019) Territorial representation and the opinion–policy linkage: Evidence from the European Union. American Journal of Political Science63(1): 197–211.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
