One of the greatest achievements of the EU is the freedom of movement between member states offering citizens equal rights in EU member states. EU enlargement and the COVID-19 pandemic allow for a critical test of whether EU citizens are indeed treated equally in practice. We test preferential treatment of EU citizens in two hypothetical choice experiments in Germany at two different time points: in the period before and during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown. Theories of responses to threat suggest that the COVID-19 crisis should increase discrimination against mobile EU citizens. While our findings reveal sizeable discrimination based on nationality and language proficiency of mobile EU citizens, the findings also suggest that, contrary to expectations, discrimination did not increase in the initial COVID-19 crisis period.
AdamCFernández-i-MarínXJamesO, et al. (2021) Differential discrimination against mobile EU citizens: Experimental evidence from bureaucratic choice settings. Journal of European Public Policy28(5): 742–760.
3.
AllenbyGMGinterJL (1995) Using extremes to design products and segment markets. Journal of Marketing Research32(4): 392–403.
4.
AllenbyGMKimJRossiPE (2017) Economic models of choice. In: WierengaBvan der LansR (eds) Handbook of Marketing Decision Models. Cham: Springer, 199–222.
5.
AllportGW (1954) The Nature of Prejudice. Cambridge: Addison Wesley.
6.
AarøeLPetersenMBArceneauxK (2017) The behavioral immune system shapes political intuitions. Why and how individual differences in disgust sensitivity underlie opposition to immigration. American Political Science Review111(02): 277–294.
7.
BakkerBNSchumacherGGothreauC, et al. (2020) Conservatives and liberals have similar physiological responses to threats. Nature Human Behaviour4: 613–621.
8.
BaumgartnerFREppDAShoubK (2018) Suspect Citizens: What 20 Million Traffic Stops Tell us About Policing and Race. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9.
BauteSAbtsKMeulemanB (2019) Public support for European solidarity: Between Euroscepticism and EU agenda preferences?JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies57(3): 533–550.
10.
BlalockHM (1967) Toward A Theory of Minority-Group Relations. New York: Wiley.
11.
BlankTSchmidtP (2003) National identity in a united Germany. Nationalism or patriotism? An empirical test with representative data. Political Psychology24(2): 289–312.
12.
BlumerH (1958) Race prejudice as a sense of group position. The Pacific Sociological Review1(1): 3–7.
13.
BonanadCGarcía-BlasSTarazona-SantabalbinaF, et al. (2020) The effect of age on mortality in patients with COVID-19: A meta-analysis with 611,583 subjects. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association21(7): 915–918.
14.
CorrellJJuddCMParkB, et al. (2010) Measuring prejudice, stereotypes and discrimination. In: DovidioJFHewstoneMGlickPEssesVM (eds) The Sage Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 45–62.
15.
DevakumarDShannonGBhopalSS, et al. (2020) Racism and discrimination in COVID-19 responses. The Lancet395(10231): 1194.
16.
De VriesCHoboltS (2020) Does the pandemic spell the end of populism? Most likely not - here’s why. Washington Post, July 23, 2020.
17.
DovidioJFHewstoneMGlickP, et al. (2010) Prejudice, stereotyping and discrimination: Theoretical and empirical overview. In: DovidioJFHewstoneMGlickPEssesVM (eds) The Sage Handbook of Prejudice, Stereotyping and Discrimination. London: Sage Publications Ltd, 3–28.
18.
FaulknerJSchallerMParkJH, et al. (2004) Evolved disease-avoidance mechanisms and contemporary xenophobic attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations7(4): 333–353.
19.
Fernández-i-Marín X (2016) ggmcmc: Analysis of MCMC samples and Bayesian inference. Journal of Statistical Software 70(9): 1–20.
20.
Garand JC, Xu P and Davis BC (2017) Immigration attitudes and support for the welfare state in the American mass public. American Journal of Political Science 61(1): 146–162.
21.
GelmanA (2008) Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Statistics in Medicine27(15): 2865–2873.
22.
GorodzeiskyASemyonovM (2015) Not only competitive threat but also racial prejudice: Sources of anti-immigrant attitudes in European Societies. International Journal of Public Opinion Research28(3): 331–354.
23.
GreenEGTKringsFStaerkléC, et al. (2010) Keeping the vermin out: Perceived disease threat and ideological orientations as predictors of exclusionary immigration attitudes. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology20(4): 299–316.
24.
HagendoornL (1995) Intergroup biases in multiple group systems: The perception of ethnic hierarchies. European Review of Social Psychology6(1): 199–228.
25.
HainmuellerJHopkinsDJ (2014) Public attitudes toward immigration. Annual Review of Political Science17(1): 225–249.
26.
HainmuellerJHangartnerDYamamotoT (2015) Validating vignette and conjoint survey experiments against real-world behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences112(8): 2395–2400.
27.
HartmanTKStocksTVAMcKayR, et al. (2020) The authoritarian dynamic during the COVID-19 pandemic: Effects on nationalism and anti-immigrant sentiment. Social Psychological and Personality Science: 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1948550620978023
28.
Helbling M and Kriesi H (2014) Why citizens prefer high-over low-skilled immigrants. labor market competition, welfare state, and deservingness. European Sociological Review 30(5): 595–614.
29.
HibbingJRSmithKBAlfordJR (2014) Predisposed. Liberals, Conservatives, and the Biology of Political Differences. New York: Routledge.
30.
HuangJYSedlovskayaAAckermanJM, et al. (2011) Immunising against prejudice. Effects of disease protection on attitudes toward out-groups. Psychological Science22(12): 1550–1556.
31.
InglehartRBakerWE (2000) Modernisation, cultural change and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review65(1): 19–51.
32.
JordanREAdabPChengKK (2020) Covid-19: Risk factors for severe disease and death. BMJ (Clinical Research ed)368: m1198.
33.
KachanoffFBigmanYKapsaskisK, et al. (2020) Measuring realistic and symbolic threats of COVID-19 and their unique impacts on wellbeing and adherence to public health behaviors. Social Psychological and Personality Science12(5): 603–616.
34.
KassirR (2020) Risk of COVID-19 for patients with obesity. Obesity Reviews: An Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity21(6): e13034.
35.
KuntzADavidovESemyonovM (2017) The dynamic relations between economic conditions and anti-immigrant sentiment: A natural experiment in times of the European economic crisis. International Journal of Comparative Sociology58(5): 392–415.
36.
LeeperTJHoboltSBTilleyJ (2020) Measuring subgroup preferences in conjoint experiments. Political Analysis28(2): 207–221.
37.
LegewieJ (2013) Terrorist events and attitudes toward immigrants: A natural experiment. American Journal of Sociology118(5): 1199–1245.
38.
LenkPJDeSarboWSGreenPE, et al. (1996) Hierarchical Bayes conjoint analysis: Recovery of Partworth heterogeneity from reduced experimental designs. Marketing Science15(2): 173–191.
39.
MarcusGENeumanWRMacKuenM (2000) Affective Intelligence and Political Judgment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
40.
McFaddenD (1973) Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: ZarembkaP (ed) Frontiers in Econometrics. New York: Academic Press, 105–142.
41.
PereiraCValaJCosta-LopesR (2010) From prejudice to discrimination. The legitimising role of perceived threat in discrimination against immigrants. European Journal of Social Psychology40(7): 1231–1250.
42.
Pettigrew TF (2016) In pursuit of three theories: authoritarianism, relative deprivation, and intergroup contact. Annual Review of Psychology 67(1): 1–21.
43.
PiccoliL (2020) Coronavirus restrictions on movement may jeopardise the lives of the most vulnerable. Government decisions involve trade-offs and new challenges. The Washington PostApril 5, 2020.
44.
RaoL-LHanRRenX-P, et al. (2011) Disadvantage and prosocial behavior: The effects of the Wenchuan earthquake. Evolution and Human Behavior32(1): 63–69.
45.
RossiPEAllenbyGMMcCullochR (2015) Bayesian Statistics and Marketing. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons.
StephanWGStephanCW (2000) An integrated threat theory of prejudice. In: OskampS (ed) Reducing Preudice and Discrimination. Mahwah, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher, 23–45.
48.
TajfelHTurnerJC (1979) An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In: AustinWGWorchelS (eds) Monterey: The Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations. Brooks/Cole, 33–47.
49.
Thomann E and Rapp C (2018) Who deserves solidarity? Unequal treatment of immigrants in Swiss welfare policy delivery. Policy Studies Journal 46(3): 531–552.
50.
VernbyK (2013) Inclusion and public policy: Evidence from Sweden’s Introduction of noncitizen suffrage. American Journal of Political Science57(1): 15–29.
51.
WhiteAIR (2020) Historical linkages: Epidemic threat, economic risk, and xenophobia. The Lancet395(10232): 1250–1251.
52.
WielerLRexrothUGottschalkR (2020) Emerging COVID-19 success story: Germany’s strong enabling environment. 1–15. Available athttps://ourworldindata.org/covid-exemplar-germany (accessed 15 January 2021).
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
