Don’t cry for me Britannia: The resilience of the European Union to Brexit

Abstract

We assess the impact of the United Kingdom’s 2016 decision to leave the European Union on the Council of the European Union, where Brexit is likely to have the clearest observable implications. Using concepts and models from the spatial model of politics and network analysis, we formulate and test expectations regarding the effects of Brexit. We examine two of the most prominent datasets on recent decision-making in the European Union, which include data on cooperation networks among member states before and after the 2016 referendum. Our findings identify some of the political challenges that Brexit will bring, but also highlight the factors that are already helping the European Union’s remaining member states to adapt to Brexit.

Keywords

Bargaining,Brexit Council networks legislation

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Achen

(2006) Institutional realism and bargaining models. In: Thomson

Stokman

Achen

, et al. (eds) The European Union Decides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp.86–123.

Armstrong

(2018) Regulatory alignment and diversity after Brexit. Journal of European Public Policy 25(8): 1099–1117.

Bueno de Mesquita

Stokman

(eds) (1994) European Community Decision Making: Models, Applications and Comparisons. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Burt

(2005) Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. New York: Oxford University Press.

Coleman

(1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. The American Journal of Sociology 94: S95–S120.

Crombez

(1996) Legislative procedures in the European Community. British Journal of Political Science 26: 199–228.

Feiock

Scholz

(eds) (2010) Self-Organizing Governance: Collaborative Mechanisms to Mitigate Institutional Collective Action Dilemmas. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gamble

(2018) Taking back control: The political implications of Brexit. Journal of European Public Policy 25(8): 1215–1232.

Häge

Naurin

(2013) The effect of co-decision on Council decision-making: Informalization, politicization, and power. Journal of European Public Policy 20(7): 953–971.

10.

Hunter

(2007) Curved exponential family models for social networks. Social Networks 27: 216–230.

11.

Hayes-Renshaw

Wallace

(2006) The Council of Ministers. 2nd ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

12.

Huhe

Naurin

Thomson

(2018) The evolution of political networks: Evidence from the Council of the European Union. European Union Politics 19(19): 25–51.

13.

Jacobs

(2018) The EU after Brexit: Institutional and Policy Implications. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

14.

Keohane

(1984) After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

15.

Knoke

Pappi

Broadbent

, et al. (1996) Comparing Policy Networks. Labor Politics in the US, Germany and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

16.

Krotz

Schild

(2018) Back to the future? Franco-German bilateralism in Europe’s post-Brexit union. Journal of European Public Policy 25(8): 1174–1193.

17.

Laumann

Knoke

(1987) The Organizational State: Social Choice in National Policy Domains. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

18.

Möller

Oliver

(eds) (2014) The United Kingdom and the European Union: What would a ‘Brexit’ mean for the EU and other states around the world? Berlin: German Council on Foreign Relations (DGAPanalyse 16). Available at: https://dgap.org/en/article/getFullPDF/25763 (accessed 23 September 2019).

19.

Naurin

(2015) Generosity in intergovernmental negotiations: The impact of state power, pooling and socialization in the Council of the EU. European Journal of Political Research 54(4): 726–744.

20.

Naurin

Lindahl

(2010) Out in the cold? Flexible integration and the political status of euro opt-outs. European Union Politics 11(4): 485–509.

21.

Naurin

Markus

Lindahl

(2017) The Cooperation and Negotiations in the Council of the European Union Dataset. Sweden: Centre for European Research at the University of Gothenburg (CERGU).

22.

Oliver

(2016) European and international views of Brexit. Journal of European Public Policy 23(9): 1321–1328.

23.

Putnam

(1993) Making Democracy Work. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

24.

Robins

Pip

Kalish

, et al. (2007) An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks 29: 173–191.

25.

Schneider

Teske

Melissa

, et al. (1997) Institutional arrangements and the creation of social capital: the effects of public school choice. American Political Science Review 91(1): 82–93.

26.

Steenbergen

Siczek

(2017) Better the devil you know? Risk-taking, globalization and populism in Great Britain. European Union Politics 18(1): 119–136.

27.

Steunenberg

(1994) Decision-making under different institutional arrangements: Legislation by the European Community. Journal of Theoretical and Institutional Economics 150: 642–669.

28.

Thomson

(2011) Resolving Controversy in the European Union: Legislative Decision-Making Before and After Enlargement. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

29.

Thomson

Arregui

Leuffen

, et al. (2012) A new dataset on decision-making in the European Union before and after the 2004 and 2007 enlargements (DEUII). Journal of European Public Policy 19 (4): 604–622.

30.

Thomson

Stokman

Achen

, et al. (eds) (2006) The European Union Decides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

31.

Tsebelis

Garrett

(2000) Legislative politics in the European Union. European Union Politics 1(1): 9–36.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.37 MB