The Common Security and Defense Policy of the European Union has recently come to the forefront as a potential force of integration. This study explores the consequences (if any) of such a move, investigating how likely it is for Common Security and Defense Policy to be politicized and become a new area of dissent. The article explores conditions of politicization at three different levels of analysis: (a) the systemic level, where Common Security and Defense Policy position in a bi-dimensional political space (left–right and anti-pro EU) is discussed; (b) the party level, where potentially successful issue entrepreneurs of Common Security and Defense Policy are identified; (c) the individual voter level, where the probabilities of being mobilized by issue entrepreneurs of Common Security and Defense Policy are assessed. Our analysis suggests that although Common Security and Defense Policy is prone to be politicized and right-wing parties are the most likely group to do so, this move may backfire as right-wing voters are less likely to be mobilized on Common Security and Defense Policy compared to their left-wing counterpart. We discuss the implications of these results for the conceptualization of politicization and European integration.
Abou-ChadiTKrauseW (2018) The causal effect of radical right success on mainstream parties’ policy positions: a regression discontinuity approach. British Journal of Political Science. Epub ahead of print 14 June 2018. DOI: 10.1017/S0007123418000029.
2.
BaumMAPotterPBK (2008)
The relationships between mass media, public opinion, and foreign policy: toward a theoretical synthesis.Annual Review of Political Science11: 39–65.
3.
BaunM (2005)
How necessary is a common strategic culture?Oxford Journal on Good Governance2(1): 33–37.
4.
BiavaADrentMHerdGP (2011)
Characterising the EU’s strategic culture: an analytical framework.Journal of Common Market Studies49(6): 1227–1248.
CarminesEGStimsonJA (1986)
On the structure and sequence of issue evolution.American Political Science Review80(3): 901–920.
7.
CladiLLocatelliA (eds) (2016) International Relations Theory and European Security: We Thought We Knew.
London:
Routledge.
8.
CostelloRThomassenJRosemaM (2012)
European Parliament elections and political representation: policy congruence between voters and parties.West European Politics35(6): 1226–1248.
9.
DaltonRJ (1985)
Political parties and political representation: party supporters and party elites in nine nations.Comparative Political Studies18: 267–299.
10.
De VriesCE (2007)
Sleeping giant: fact or fairytale? How European Integration affects national elections. European Union Politics8(3): 363–385.
11.
De VriesCEEdwardsEE (2009)
Taking Europe to its extremes.Party Politics15(1): 5–28.
12.
De WildePLeupoldASchmidtkeH (2016)
The differentiated politicisation of European Governance.West European Politics39(1): 3–22.
13.
DukeS (2016) The common security and defense policy. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia on Politics. Epub ahead of print
November 2016. DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.156.
14.
EichenbergRC (1989) Public Opinion and National security in Western Europe.
London:
MacMillan.
15.
EichenbergRC (2000) NATO and European Security after the Cold War: will European citizens support a common security policy? In: NacosLBShapiroRYIserniaP (eds) Decision Making in a Glass House. Mass Media, Public Opinion, and American and European Foreign Policy in the 21st Century.
Lanham, MD:
Rowman & Littlefield, pp.155–176.
16.
EnelowJMHinichMJ (1984) The Spatial Theory of Voting.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
17.
EvertsP (1998) NATO, the European Community and the United Nations. In: NiedermayerOSinnotR (eds) Public Opinion and Internationalized Governance.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, pp.402–430.
18.
FligsteinN (2008) Euroclash. The EU, European Identity, and the Future of Europe.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
19.
Green-PedersenC (2012)
A giant fast asleep? Party incentives and the politicisation of European Integration.Political Studies60(1): 115–130.
20.
HeinenNKreutzmannA-K (2015) A profile of Europe’s populist parties. Structures, strengths, potential. Deutsche Bank Research. EU Monitor, European Integration, 28 April 2015.
21.
HixS (1999)
Dimensions and alignments in European Union politics: cognitive constraints and partisan responses.European Journal of Political Research35(1): 69–106.
22.
HoboltSBDe VriesCE (2015)
Issue entrepreneurship and multiparty competition.Comparative Political Studies48(9): 1159–1185.
23.
HoboltSBDe VriesCE (2016)
Public support for European Integration.Annual Review of Political Science19(1): 413–432.
24.
HofmannSC (2013) European Security is NATO’s Shadow.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
25.
HoogheLMarksG (2009)
A post-functionalist theory of European Integration: from permissive consensus to constraining dissensus.British Journal of Political Science39(1): 1–23.
26.
HoogheLMarksG (2012) Politicization. In: JonesEMenonAWeatherillS (eds) The Oxford Handbook of the European Union.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, pp.840–853.
27.
HoogheLMarksG (2018) Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage. Journal of European Public Policy. 25(1): 109–135. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1310279.
28.
HoworthJ (2001)
European defence and the changing politics of the European Union: hanging together or hanging separately?Journal of Common Market Studies39(4): 765–789.
29.
IrondelleBMérandFFoucaultM (2015)
Public support for European Defence: does strategic culture matter?European Journal of Political Research54 (2): 363–383.
30.
KriesiHGrandeELachatR, et al. (2008) West European Politics in the Age of Globalization.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
31.
KrotzUMaherR (2011)
International relations theory and the rise of European Foreign and Security Policy.World Politics63(3): 548–579.
32.
MarksGSteenbergenMR (eds) (2004) European Integration and Political Conflict.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
33.
MatlaryJHØsterudØ (2007) Denationalisation of Defence. Convergence and Diversity.
Aldershot:
Ashgate.
34.
MattilaMRaunioT (2012)
Drifting further apart: national parties and their electorates on the EU dimension.West European Politics35(3): 589–606.
35.
MenonA (2013) Defence policy and the logic of high politics. In: GenschelPJachtenfuchsM (eds) Beyond the Regulatory Polity? The European Integration of Core State Powers.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, pp.66–85.
36.
MérandFAngersK (2013) Military integration in Europe. In: GenschelPJachtenfuchsM (eds) Beyond the Regulatory Polity? The European Integration of Core State Powers.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, pp.46–65.
37.
MüllerWCJennyMEckerA (2012) The elites-masses gap in European Integration. In: BestHLengyelGVerzichelliL (eds) The Europe of Elites.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, pp.167–191.
38.
OppermannKHöseA (2007)
Public opinion and the development of the European Security and Defence Policy. European Foreign Affairs Review12(2): 149–167.
39.
RathbunBC (2004) Partisan Interventions. European Party Politics and Peace Enforcement in the Balkans.
Ithaca:
Cornell University Press.
40.
RaunioTWagnerW (2017)
Towards Parliamentarisation of foreign and security policy?West European Politics40(1): 1–19.
41.
RosatoS (2011)
Europe’s troubles. Power politics and the state of the European Project.International Security35(4): 45–86.
42.
SchattschneiderEE (1960) The Semisovereign People. A Realist’s View of Democracy in America.
New York:
Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
43.
SchmitterPC (1969)
Three neo-functional hypotheses about international integration.International Organization23(1): 161–166.
44.
SchoenH (2008)
Identity, instrumental self-interest and institutional evaluations. Explaining public opinion on common European Policies in Foreign Affairs and Defence. European Union Politics9(1): 5–29.
45.
SenningerRWagnerM (2015)
Political parties and the EU in national election campaigns: who talks about Europe, and how?JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies53(6): 1336–1351.
46.
SerranoO (2013) The Domestic Sources of European Foreign Policy. Defence and Enlargement.
Amsterdam:
Amsterdam University Press.
47.
SzczerbiakATaggartP (eds) (2008) Opposing Europe? The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
48.
van der EijkC (2001)
Measuring agreement in ordered rating scales. Quantity and Quality35(3): 325–341.
49.
van der EijkCFranklinM (2004) Potential for contestation on European matters at national elections in Europe. In: MarksGSteenbergenMR (eds) European integration and political conflict.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press, pp.32–50.
50.
van der EijkCFranklinM (2007) the sleeping giant: potential for political mobilization of disaffection in Europe. In: van der BrugWvan der EijkC (eds) European Elections and Domestic Politics: Lessons from the Past and Scenarios for the Future.
Paris:
University of Notre Dame Press, pp.189–208.
51.
WagnerWHerranz-SurrallésAKaarboJ, et al. (2017)
The party politics of legislative‒executive relations in security and defence policy.West European Politics40(1): 20–41.
52.
WeissM (2013) Integrating the acquisition of Leviathan’s swords? The emerging regulation of defence procurement within the EU. In: GenschelPJachtenfuchsM (eds) Beyond the Regulatory Polity? The European Integration of Core State Powers.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press, pp.27–45.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
