Against democratic deficits of European Union (EU) governance, recent literature emphasizes the communicative function of national parliaments. Yet, arguments from the broader EU politicization literature have been only rarely applied to public parliamentary debates. This article integrates arguments about supranational authority and partisan competition as key drivers of debates on the EU and tests respective implications by an automated text analysis that retrieves EU references in all 1,393 plenary debates of the German Bundestag during 1991–2013. A panel analysis identifies authority transfers as the strongest predictor for EU salience in the plenary. EU references furthermore increase with supranational policy output, public EU visibility, and a differentiating public opinion. With regard to partisan emphasis, mainstream and particularly governing parties push European issues in the German Bundestag.
AuelK (2006) The Europeanisation of the German Bundestag: Institutional change and informal adaptation. German Politics15(3): 249–268.
2.
AuelK (2007) Democratic Accountability and National Parliaments: Redefining the impact of parliamentary scrutiny in EU affairs. European Law Journal13(4): 487–504.
3.
AuelKRaunioT (2014a) Debating the state of the Union? Comparing parliamentary debates on EU issues in Finland, France, Germany and the United Kingdom. The Journal of Legislative Studies20(1): 13–28.
4.
AuelKRaunioT (2014b) Introduction: Connecting with the electorate? Parliamentary communication in EU affairs. The Journal of Legislative Studies20(1): 1–12.
5.
BailerSSchneiderG (2006) Nash versus Schelling? The importance of constraints in legislative bargaining. In: ThomsonRStokmanFNAchenCHKönigT (eds) The European Union Decides, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 153–177.
BiesenbenderJ (2011) The dynamics of treaty change – measuring the distribution of power in the European Union. European Integration online Papers (EIoP). 15(51–24.
8.
BoomgaardenHVliegenthartRDe VreeseC (2010) News on the move: Exogenous events and news coverage of the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy17(4): 506–526.
9.
BörzelT (2005) Mind the gap! European integration between level and scope. Journal of European Public Policy12(2): 217–236.
10.
BudgeI (1982) Electoral volatility: Issue effects and basic change in 23 post-war democracies. Electoral Studies1(2): 147–168.
11.
CardieCWilkersonJ (2008) Text annotation for political science research. Journal of Information Technology & Politics5(1): 1–6.
12.
CrumB (2007) Party stances in the referendums on the EU constitution. European Union Politics8(1): 61–82.
13.
De WildeP (2011a) Ex ante vs. ex post: The trade-off between partisan conflict and visibility in debating EU policy-formulation in national parliaments. Journal of European Public Policy18(5): 672–689.
14.
De WildeP (2011b) No polity for old politics? A framework for analyzing the politicization of European integration. Journal of European Integration33(5): 559–575.
15.
De Wilde P (2012) Why the early warning mechanism does not alleviate the democratic deficit. OPAL Online Paper Series 2012(6).
16.
De WildeP (2014) The operating logics of national parliaments and mass media in the politicisation of Europe. The Journal of Legislative Studies20(1): 46–61.
17.
De WildePZürnM (2012) Can the politicization of European integration be reversed?Journal of Common Market Studies50(S1): 137–153.
18.
DolezalMEnnser-JedenastikLMüllerW (2014) How parties compete for votes: A test of saliency theory. European Journal of Political Research53(1): 57–76.
19.
EichenbergRCDaltonRJ (2007) Post-Maastricht blues: The transformation of citizen support for European integration, 1973–2004. Acta Politica42(2–3): 128–152.
20.
FranklinMWlezienC (1997) The responsive public: Issue salience, policy change, and preferences for European unification. Journal of Theoretical Politics9(3): 347–363.
21.
GabelM (1998) Public support for European integration: An empirical test of five theories. Journal of Politics60(2): 333–354.
22.
GabelMScheveK (2007) Mixed messages: Party dissent and mass opinion on European integration. European Union Politics8(1): 37–59.
23.
Gattermann K, Högenauer AL and Huff A (2013) National parliaments After Lisbon: Towards mainstreaming of EU affairs? OPAL Online Paper Series 2013(13). Available at: http://www.opal-europe.org/tmp/Opal%20Online%20Paper/13.pdf (accessed 13 August 2014).
24.
Green-PedersenC (2012) A giant fast asleep? Party incentives and the politicisation of European integration. Political Studies60(1): 115–130.
25.
GrimmerJStewartB (2013) Text as data: The promise and pitfalls of automatic content analysis methods for political texts. Political Analysis21(3): 267–297.
26.
HägeF (2011) The European Union policy-making dataset. European Union Politics12(3): 455–477.
27.
HixS (2005) The Political System of the European Union, 2nd ed. Houndsmills, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
28.
HolzhackerR (2002) National parliamentary scrutiny over EU issues. European Union Politics3(4): 459–479.
29.
HoogheLMarksG (2005) Calculation, community and cues: Public opinion on European integration. European Union Politics6(4): 419–443.
30.
HoogheLMarksG (2009) A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus. British Journal of Political Science39(1): 1–23.
31.
Hutter S and Grande E (2014) Politicizing Europe in the national electoral arena: A comparative analysis of five West European countries, 1970–2010. Journal of Common Market Studies. Available at: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcms.12133/abstract (accessed 13 August 2014).
32.
KittelBWinnerH (2005) How reliable is pooled analysis in political economy? The globalization-welfare state nexus revisited. European Journal of Political Research44(2): 269–293.
33.
König T and Mäder L (2009) The myth of 80% and the impact of Europeanisation on German legislation. Arbeitspapier des Mannheimer Zentrums für Europäische Sozialforschung 118. Available at: http://edoc.vifapol.de/opus/volltexte/2011/3437/pdf/wp_118.pdf (accessed 13 August 2014).
34.
KriesiH (2007) The role of European integration in national election campaigns. European Union Politics8(1): 83–108.
35.
Kriesi H, Grande E, Lachat R, et al. Globalization and the transformation of the national political space: Six European countries compared. European Journal of Political Research 45(6): 921–956.
36.
MattilaMRaunioT (2006) Cautious voters – supportive parties. European Union Politics7(4): 427–449.
37.
MiklinE (2014) EU politicisation and national parliaments: Visibility of choices and better aligned ministers?The Journal of Legislative Studies20(1): 78–92.
38.
MonroeBSchrodtP (2008) Introduction to the special issue: The statistical analysis of political text. Political Analysis16(4): 351–355.
39.
PlümperTTroegerVManowP (2005) Panel data analysis in comparative politics: Linking method to theory. European Journal of Political Research44(2): 327–354.
40.
RayL (1999) Measuring party orientations towards European integration: Results from an expert survey. European Journal of Political Research36(2): 283–306.
41.
Rauh C (2012) Politicisation, issue salience, and consumer policies of the European Commission: Does public awareness and contestation of supranational matters increase the responsiveness of Europe’s central agenda-setter? PhD Thesis, Department of Political and Social Sciences, Freie Universität, Berlin.
42.
RauhCZürnM (2014) Zur Politisierung der EU in der Krise. In: HeidenreichM (ed) Krise der europäischen Vergesellschaftung? Soziologische Perspektiven, Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS, pp. 121–148.
43.
RaunioT (2009) National parliaments and European integration: What we know and agenda for future research. The Journal of Legislative Studies15(4): 317–334.
44.
SiebererU (2006) Agenda setting in the German Bundestag: A weak government in a consensus democracy. German Politics15(1): 49–72.
45.
SprungkC (2013) A new type of representative democracy? Reconsidering the role of national parliaments in the European Union. Journal of European Integration35(5): 547–563.
46.
Statham PaulTrenzHJ (2012) The Politicization of Europe: Contesting the Constitution in the Mass Media, Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
47.
SteenbergenMREdwardsEEDe VriesCE (2007) Who’s cueing whom? Mass-elite linkages and the future of European integration. European Union Politics8(1): 13–35.
48.
SteenbergenMMarksG (2007) Evaluating expert judgments. European Journal of Political Research46(3): 347–366.
49.
TzelgovE (2014) Cross-cutting issues, intraparty dissent and party strategy: The issue of European integration in the House of Commons. European Union Politics15(1): 3–23.
50.
UbaKUgglaF (2011) Protest Actions against the European Union, 1992–2007. West European Politics34(2): 384–393.
51.
Van der EijkCFranklinMN (2004) Potential for contestation on European matters at national elections in Europe. In: SteenbergenMRMarksG (eds) European Integration and Political Conflict, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press, pp. 32–50.
52.
VolkensALehmannPMerzN (2014) The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR), Berlin, Germany: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB)Available at: https://manifestoproject.wzb.eu/ (accessed 13 August 2014).
53.
WendlerF (2013) Challenging domestic politics? European debates of national parliaments in France, Germany and the UK. Journal of European Integration35(7): 801–817.
54.
Winzen T (2010) Political integration and national parliaments in Europe. Living Reviews in Democracy 2(1).
55.
WinzenT (2012) National parliamentary control of European Union affairs: A cross-national and longitudinal comparison. West European Politics35(3): 657–672.
56.
WonkaARittbergerB (2013) The ties that bind? Intra-party information exchanges of German MPs in EU multi-level politics. West European Politics37(3): 624–643.
57.
WooldridgeJM (2003) Introductory Econometrics: A Modern ApproachVol. 2, Mason, OH: Thomson South Western.
58.
ZallerJ (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion, Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
59.
ZürnMBinderMEcker-EhrhardtM (2012) International authority and its politicization. International Theory4(1): 69–106.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
