Why do some Europeans support immigration from within the European Union, while rejecting immigration from elsewhere? Acceptance of intra-European Union mobility—even by those who wish to restrict immigration more generally—is important for popular support for the European Union itself. This paper identifies and attempts to explain the preferences of “EU-only inclusionists”: EU nationals who support relatively high levels of immigration, but only from within the European Union. We analyze an underexplored experimental module in the European Social Survey to explore European Union inclusionism in relation to other preference profiles. We find that identification with the European Union helps explain specific support for European Union mobility, while subnational (racial and religious) identities are associated with a preference for European migrants over non-Europeans, but not with specific support for intra-European Union movement.
AzroutRWojcieszakME (2017)
What’s Islam got to do with it? Attitudes toward specific religious and national out-groups, and support for EU policies.European Union Politics18(1): 51–72.
2.
BansakKHainmuellerJHangartnerD (2016)
How economic, humanitarian, and religious concerns shape European attitudes toward asylum seekers.Science354(6309): 217–222.
3.
BeaudonnetLDi MauroD (2012) Support for Europe: Assessing the Complexity of Individual Attitudes. ID 2191447, SSRN Scholarly Paper.
Rochester, NY:
Social Science Research Network. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2191447 (accessed 1 March 2019).
4.
BergJA (2010)
Race, class, gender, and social space: Using an intersectional approach to study immigration attitudes.The Sociological Quarterly51(2): 278–302.
5.
BlinderS (2015)
Imagined immigration: The impact of different meanings of ‘Immigrants’ in public opinion and policy debates in Britain.Political Studies63(1): 80–100.
6.
BogardKLSherrodLR (2008)
Citizenship attitudes and allegiances in diverse youth.Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology14(4): 286–296.
7.
BruterM (2009)
Time bomb? The dynamic effect of news and symbols on the political identity of European citizens. Comparative Political Studies42(12): 1498–1536.
8.
BurnsPGimpelJG (2000)
Economic insecurity, prejudicial stereotypes, and public opinion on immigration policy.Political Science Quarterly115(2): 201–225.
9.
CeobanuAMEscandellX (2010)
Comparative analyses of public attitudes toward immigrants and immigration using multinational survey data: A review of theories and research.Annual Review of Sociology36: 309–328.
CreightonMJSchmidtPZavala‐RojasD (2018) Race, wealth and the masking of opposition to immigrants in the Netherlands. International Migration EarlyView online.
12.
CurtisKA (2014)
Inclusive versus exclusive: A cross-national comparison of the effects of subnational, national, and supranational identity.European Union Politics15(4): 521–546.
13.
DuffyBFrere-SmithT (2014) Perceptions and Reality: Public attitudes to immigration.
London:
Ipsos-MORI Research Institute.
14.
Elsas EJ van, Hakhverdian A and Brug W van der (2016)
United against a common foe? The nature and origins of Euroscepticism among left-wing and right-wing citizens.West European Politics39(6): 1181–1204.
15.
ErisenE (2017)
Seeking refuge in a superordinate group: Non-EU immigration heritage and European identification.European Union Politics18(1): 26–50.
16.
European Social Survey (2014). ESS-7 2014 Documentation Report. Edition 3.2. Bergen, European Social Survey Data Archive, NSD - Norwegian Centre for Research Data for ESS ERIC. doi:10.21338/NSD-ESS7-2014.
17.
FacchiniGMaydaAM (2009)
Does the welfare state affect individual attitudes toward immigrants? Evidence across countries.Review of Economics and Statistics91(2): 295–314.
18.
FavellA (2008)
The new face of east–west migration in Europe.Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies34(5): 701–716.
19.
FligsteinNPolyakovaASandholtzW (2012)
European integration, nationalism and European identity.JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies50(s1): 106–122.
20.
FordR (2008)
Is racial prejudice declining in Britain?The British Journal of Sociology59(4): 609–636.
21.
GabelM (1998)
Public support for European integration: An empirical test of five theories.The Journal of Politics60(2): 333–354.
22.
GeddesAHadj-AbdouL (2016) An unstable equilibrium: Freedom of movement and the welfare state in the European Union. In: Gary P. Freeman and NIkola Mirilovic (eds) Handbook on Migration and Social Policy. Cheltenham, UK: Elgar, pp. 222–238.
23.
GerberASHuberGABiggersDR, et al. (2017)
Self-interest, beliefs, and policy opinions: Understanding how economic beliefs affect immigration policy preferences.Political Research Quarterly70(1): 155–171.
24.
GoodwinMMilazzoC (2017)
Taking back control? Investigating the role of immigration in the 2016 vote for Brexit.The British Journal of Politics and International Relations19(3): 450–464.
25.
GorodzeiskyASemyonovM (2016)
Not only competitive threat but also racial prejudice: Sources of anti-immigrant attitudes in European societies.International Journal of Public Opinion Research28(3): 331–354.
26.
HainmuellerJHiscoxMJ (2010)
Attitudes toward highly skilled and low-skilled immigration: Evidence from a survey experiment.American Political Science Review104(1): 61–84.
27.
HainmuellerJHopkinsDJ (2014)
Public attitudes toward immigration.Annual Review of Political Science17(1): 225–249.
28.
HanmerMJKalkanKO (2013)
Behind the curve: Clarifying the best approach to calculating predicted probabilities and marginal effects from limited dependent variable models.American Journal of Political Science57(1): 263–277.
29.
HoboltSBde VriesCE (2016)
Public support for European integration.Annual Review of Political Science19: 413–432.
30.
HoogheLMarksG (2005)
Calculation, community and cues: Public opinion onEuropean integration. European Union Politics6(4): 419–443.
31.
HoogheLMarksG (2009)
A postfunctionalist theory of European integration: From permissive consensus to constraining dissensus.British Journal of Political Science39(1): 1–23.
32.
HoogheLMarksG (2018)
Cleavage theory meets Europe’s crises: Lipset, Rokkan, and the transnational cleavage.Journal of European Public Policy25(1): 109–135.
33.
JeannetA-M (2018)
Revisiting the labor market competition hypothesis in a comparative perspective: Does retirement affect opinion about immigration?Research & Politics5(3): 2053168018784503.
34.
Kentmen-CinCErisenC (2017)
Anti-immigration attitudes and the opposition to European integration: A critical assessment.European Union Politics18(1): 3–25.
35.
KuhnT (2015) Experiencing European Integration: Transnational Lives and European Identity.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
MaydaAM (2006)
Who is against immigration? A cross-country investigation of individual attitudes toward immigrants.Review of Economics and Statistics88(3): 510–530.
38.
McLarenLJohnsonM (2007)
Resources, group conflict and symbols: Explaining anti-immigration hostility in Britain.Political Studies55(4): 709–732.
39.
McLarenLM (2001)
Immigration and the new politics of inclusion and exclusion in the European Union: The effect of elites and the EU on individual–level opinions regarding European and non–European immigrants.European Journal of Political Research39(1): 81–108.
40.
O’RourkeKHSinnottR (2006)
The determinants of individual attitudes towards immigration.European Journal of Political Economy22(4): 838–861.
41.
PasekJTahkALelkesY, et al. (2009)
Determinants of turnout and candidate choice in the 2008 U.S. Presidential election.Public Opinion Quarterly73(5): 943–994.
42.
PichlerF (2010)
Foundations of anti-immigrant sentiment: The variable nature of perceived group threat across changing European societies, 2002-2006.International Journal of Comparative Sociology51(6): 445–469.
43.
RisseT (2010) A Community of Europeans? Transnational Identities and Public Spheres.
Ithaca, NY:
Cornell University Press.
44.
RuhsM (2017)
Free movement in the European Union: National institutions vs common policies?International Migration55: 22–38.
45.
RuhsM (2018)
Labor immigration policies in high-income countries: Variations across political regimes and varieties of capitalism.The Journal of Legal Studies47(S1): S89–S127.
46.
SpigelmanA (2013)
The depiction of Polish migrants in the United Kingdom by the British press after Poland’s accession to the European Union.International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy33(1/2): 98–113.
47.
SteenbergenMRJonesBS (2002)
Modeling multilevel data structures.American Journal of Political Science46(1): 218–237.
48.
StockemerDNiemannARabenschlagJ, et al. (2018)
Immigration, anti-immigrant attitudes and Eurosceptism: A meta-analysis.French Politics16(3): 328–340.
49.
StrabacZListhaugO (2008)
Anti-Muslim prejudice in Europe: A multilevel analysis of survey data from 30 countries.Social Science Research37(1): 268–286.
50.
TeneyCLacewellOPDe WildeP (2013)
Winners and losers of globalization in Europe: Attitudes and ideologies.European Political Science Review6(4): 575–595.
51.
ValentinoNASorokaSNIyengarS, et al. (2017)
Economic and cultural drivers of immigrant support worldwide. British Journal of Political Science. Epub ahead of print 1 November 2017. DOI: 10.1017/S000712341700031X
52.
ZallerJR (1992) The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion.
New York, NY:
Cambridge University Press.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
