Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

We analyze data from an author-conducted survey of members of the French and German parliaments on European Monetary Union reform preferences. We consider three potential drivers of preferences: nationality, ideology, and personal characteristics. For European Monetary Union policies like Eurobonds, the Fiscal Compact, and the European Central Bank asset purchase program we find a robust difference between parliamentarians of both countries if they belong to the same party family and controlling for individual characteristics. Based on our estimates, however, we predict agreement between German left-wingers and French conservatives even for ideological differences that are smaller than the current difference between the left and the right European party families. Our findings suggest that deeply-rooted national differences do not impose a prohibitive obstacle to a German-French parliamentary consensus on European Monetary Union policies.

Keywords

Comparative politics European Monetary Union reforms elite survey members of national parliament policy preferences

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Alesina

Tabellini

Trebbi

(2017) Is Europe an Optimal Political Area?, National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 23325.

Andor

(2014) Basic European unemployment insurance – The best way forward in strengthening the EMU’s resilience and Europe’s recovery. Intereconomics 49: 184–189.

Aspinwall

(2002) Preferring Europe: Ideology and national preferences on European integration, European Union Politics 3(1): 81–111.

Bergsten

(2012) Why the Euro will survive: Completing the continent's half-built house. Foreign Affairs 91(5): 16–22.

Bénassy-Quéré

Trannoy

Wolff

(2014) Tax harmonization in Europe: Moving forward. Notes du conseil d’analyse économique 4: 1–12.

Blesse

Boyer

Heinemann

, et al. (2017) Intégration européenne et politiques du marché du travail: Quel consensus entre parlementaires français et allemands?. Revue d’économie politique 127(5): 737–759.

Brunnermeier

James

Landau

(2016) The Euro and the Battle of Ideas. Princeton, NJ/Oxford: Princeton University Press.

Bundesverfassungsgericht (2014) Verfassungsbeschwerden und Organstreitverfahren gegen Europäischen Stabilitätsmechanismus und Fiskalpakt erfolglos, Pressemitteilung Nr. 23/2014 vom 18. März 2014, Karlsruhe.

Buti

Carnot

(2012) The EMU debt crisis: Early lessons and reforms. Journal of Common Market Studies 50: 899–911.

10.

Copelovitch

Frieden

Walter

(2016) The political economy of the euro crisis. Comparative Political Studies 49(7): 811–840.

11.

Creel

Hubert

Saraceno

(2012) The European fiscal compact: A counterfactual assessment. Journal of Economic Integration 27(4): 537–563.

12.

De Ville

Berckvens

(2015) What do eurozone academics think about EMU reform? On broad support and German exceptionalism. College of Europe, Brueges Political Research Papers, 41/2015.

13.

Degner

Leuffen

(2019) Franco-German cooperation and the rescuing of the Eurozone. European Union Politics 20(1): 89–108.

14.

Delpla

von Weizsäcker

(2010) The Blue Bond Proposal. Bruegel Policy Brief No 2010/03, May.

15.

Deschouwer

Depauw

(2014) Representing the People. A Survey among Members of Statewide and Sub-state Parliaments. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

16.

Dolls

Fuest

Neumann

, et al. (2018) An unemployment insurance scheme for the euro area? A comparison of different alternatives using micro data. International Tax and Public Finance 25(1): 273–309.

17.

Drudi

Durré

Mongelli

(2012) The interplay of economic reforms and monetary policy: The case of the Eurozone. Journal of Common Market Studies 50: 881–898.

18.

Dullien

(2014) A European Unemployment Benefit Scheme. How to Provide for More Stability in the Euro Zone. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann-Stiftung.

19.

Dyson

(1999) The Franco–German relationship and economic and monetary union: Using Europe to ‘Bind Leviathan’. West European Politics 22(1): 25–44.

20.

European Commission (2017) Reflection Paper on the Deepening of the Economic and Monetary Union, COM (2017) 291 of 31 May, Brussels.

21.

Frieden

Walter

(2019) Analyzing inter-state negotiations in the Eurozone crisis and beyond. European Union Politics 20(1): 134–151.

22.

Gavoille

(2018) Who are the ‘ghost’ MPs? Evidence from the French parliament. European Journal of Political Economy 53: 134–148.

23.

Guiso

Herrera

Morelli

(2016) Cultural differences and institutional integration. Journal of International Economics 99: 97–113.

24.

Hallerberg

Wehner

(2018) When do you get economists as policy makers? British Journal of Political Science 1–13.

25.

Haughwout

(2002) Public infrastructure investments, productivity and welfare in fixed geographic areas. Journal of Public Economics 83(3): 405–428.

26.

Heinemann

Janeba

(2011) Viewing tax policy through party-colored glasses: What German politicians believe. German Economic Review 12: 286–311.

27.

Heinemann

Mohl

Osterloh

(2009) Who’s afraid of an EU tax and why? – Revenue system preferences in the European Parliament. The Review of International Organizations 4(1): 73–99.

28.

Heß

Scheve

Schupp

, et al. (2013) Members of German Federal Parliament more risk loving than general population. SOEP papers 545.

29.

Hix

(2001) Legislative behaviour and party competition in the European Parliament: An application of nominate to the EU. Journal of Common Market Studies 39(4): 663–688.

30.

Hix

Noury

Roland

(2006) Dimensions of politics in the European Parliament. American Journal of Political Science 50(2): 494–511.

31.

Hix

Noury

(2011) After enlargement: Voting patterns in the sixth European Parliament. Legislative Studies Quarterly 34(2): 159–174.

32.

Hodson

(2013) The Eurozone in 2012: ‘Whatever It Takes to Preserve the Euro'? Journal of Common Market Studies, Annual Review 51: 183–200.

33.

Howarth

Quaglia

(2014) The steep road to European Banking Union: Constructing the single resolution mechanism. Journal of Common Market Studies, Annual Review 52: 125–140.

34.

Krotz

Schild

(2013) Shaping Europe: France, Germany, and embedded bilateralism from the Elysée Treaty to twenty-first century politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

35.

Maatsch

(2015) Empowered or disempowered? The role of National Parliaments during the reform of European Economic Governance (No. 15/10), MPIfG Discussion Paper.

36.

Marsh

(2010) The Euro: The Battle for the New Global Currency, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

37.

Schoeller

(2018) The rise and fall of Merkozy: Franco-German bilateralism as a negotiation strategy in eurozone crisis management. Journal of Common Market Studies 56(5): 1019–1035.

38.

Scully

Hix

Farrell

(2012) National or European parliamentarians? Evidence from a new survey of the members of the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies 50(4): 670–683.

39.

Wasserfallen

(2014) Political and economic integration in the EU: The case of failed tax harmonization. Journal of Common Market Studies 52(2): 420–435.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

1.57 MB

European Monetary Union reform preferences of French and German parliamentarians

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material