The European Parliament organizes its legislative activities along two chains of delegation to the rapporteurs – one institutional, one partisan. We analyze discretion and agency loss along these chains of delegation from the perspective of party group coordinators who select the rapporteur on behalf of the party group. Do coordinators minimize agency loss towards their national party, their European party group, the committee median or the plenary median when allocating reports? Data from the 2009–2014 legislative term demonstrate that coordinators tend to select rapporteurs who are close to their own national party’s ideal point on the integration dimension. This has important implications for intra-parliamentary and intra-party delegation, party group cohesion and broader policy-making in the European Union.
BakkerRde VriesCEdwardsEet al. (2015)
Measuring party positions in Europe: the Chapel Hill expert survey trend file, 1999–2010. Party Politics21: 143–152.
2.
BenedettoG (2005)
Rapporteurs as legislative entrepreneurs: the dynamics of the codecision procedure in Europe’s Parliament. Journal of European Public Policy12: 67–88.
3.
BrandsmaGJ (2015)
Co-decision after Lisbon: the politics of informal trilogues in European Union lawmaking.European Union Politics16: 300–319.
4.
BressanelliEKoopCRehC (2016)
The impact of informalisation: early agreements and voting cohesion in the European Parliament.European Union Politics17: 91–113.
5.
CostelloRThomsonR (2010)
The policy impact of leadership in committees: rapporteurs’ influence on the European Parliament’s opinions.European Union Politics11: 219–240.
6.
CostelloRThomsonR (2011)
The nexus of bicameralism: rapporteurs’ impact on decision outcomes in the European Union.European Union Politics12: 337–357.
7.
CostelloRThomsonR (2013)
The distribution of power among EU institutions: who wins under codecision and why?Journal of European Public Policy20: 1025–1039.
8.
CoxGWMcCubbinsMD (2007) Legislative Leviathan – Party Government in the House. 2nd ed.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
9.
DanielWT (2013)
When the agent knows better than the principal: the effect of education and seniority on European Parliament rapporteur assignment.Journal of Common Market Studies51: 832–848.
10.
DanielWTThierseS (2018) Individual determinants for the selection of group coordinators in the European Parliament. Journal of Common Market Studies 56: 939–954.
11.
DelreuxTLalouxT (2018)
Concluding early agreements in the EU: a double principal – agent analysis of trilogue negotiations.Journal of Common Market Studies56: 300–317.
12.
European Parliament (2017) Rules of Procedure: 8th Parliamentary Term (January 2017).
Brussels:
The European Parliament.
13.
FarrellHHéritierA (2003)
Formal and informal institutions under codecision: continuous constitution‐building in Europe.Governance16: 577–600.
14.
FarrellHHéritierA (2004)
Interorganizational negotiation and intraorganizational power in shared decision making: early agreements under codecision and their impact on the European Parliament and Council.Comparative Political Studies37: 1184–1212.
15.
FinkeD (2012)
Proposal stage coalition-building in the European Parliament.European Union Politics13: 487–512.
16.
HausemerP (2006)
Participation and political competition in committee report allocation under what conditions do MEPs represent their constituents?European Union Politics7: 505–530.
17.
HéritierARehC (2012)
Codecision and its discontents: intra-organisational politics and institutional reform in the European Parliament.West European Politics35: 1134–1157.
18.
HilbeJM (2014) Modeling Count Data.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
19.
HixS (2002)
Parliamentary behavior with two principals: preferences, parties, and voting in the European Parliament.American Journal of Political Science 46: 688–698.
20.
HixSHøylandB (2013)
Empowerment of the European parliament.Annual Review of Political Science16: 171–189.
21.
HixSNouryAGRolandG (2007) Democratic Politics in the European Parliament.
Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
22.
HøylandB (2006)
Allocation of codecision reports in the fifth European Parliament. European Union Politics7: 30–50.
23.
HurkaS (2013)
Changing the output: the logic of amendment success in the European Parliament’s ENVI Committee.European Union Politics14: 273–296.
24.
HurkaSKaedingM (2012)
Report allocation in the European Parliament after eastern enlargement.Journal of European Public Policy19: 512–529.
25.
HurkaSKaedingMObholzerL (2015)
Learning on the job? EU enlargement and the assignment of (shadow) rapporteurships in the European Parliament.Journal of Common Market Studies53: 1230–1247.
26.
JudgeDEarnshawD (2011)
‘Relais actors’ and co-decision first reading agreements in the European Parliament: the case of the advanced therapies regulation.Journal of European Public Policy18: 53–71.
27.
KaedingM (2004)
Rapporteurship allocation in the European Parliament information or distribution?European Union Politics5: 353–371.
28.
KaedingM (2005)
The world of committee reports: rapporteurship assignment in the European Parliament.Journal of Legislative Studies11: 82–104.
29.
KaedingMObholzerL (2012)
Pulling the strings: party group coordinators in the European Parliament. EIPAScope2012: 13–18.
30.
KoopCRehCBressanelliE (2018)
When politics prevails: parties, elections and loyalty in the European Parliament.European Journal of Political Research57: 563–586.
31.
KrehbielK (1991) Information and Legislative Organization.
Ann Arbor:
University of Michigan Press.
32.
McElroyG (2006)
Committee representation in the European Parliament.European Union Politics7: 5–29.
33.
McElroyGBenoitK (2010)
Party policy and group affiliation in the European Parliament.British Journal of Political Science40: 377–398.
34.
NeuholdC (2001) The ‘Legislative Backbone’ keeping the institution upright? The role of European Parliament Committees in the EU policy-making process. European Integration Online Papers 5: 1–27.
35.
PittellaGVidal-QuadrasAPapastamkosG (2014) Activity report on codecision and conciliation, 14 July 2009 – 30 June 2014 (7th parliamentary term).
Brussels:
The European Parliament.
36.
PolkJRovnyJBakkerRet al. (2017)
Explaining the salience of anti-elitism and reducing political corruption for political parties in Europe with the 2014 Chapel Hill Expert Survey data. Research and Politics4: 1–9.
37.
RasmussenARehC (2013)
The consequences of concluding codecision early: trilogues and intra-institutional bargaining success.Journal of European Public Policy20: 1006–1024.
38.
RehC (2014)
Is informal politics undemocratic? Trilogues, early agreements and the selection model of representation.Journal of European Public Policy21: 822–841.
39.
RehCHéritierABressanelliEet al. (2013)
The informal politics of legislation: explaining secluded decision making in the European Union.Comparative Political Studies46: 1112–1142.
40.
RingeN (2010) Who decides, and how? Preferences, uncertainty, and policy choice in the European Parliament.
Oxford:
Oxford University Press.
41.
RogerLWinzenT (2015)
Party groups and committee negotiations in the European Parliament: outside attention and the anticipation of plenary conflict.Journal of European Public Policy22: 391–408.
42.
SettembriPNeuholdC (2009)
Achieving consensus through committees: does the European Parliament manage?Journal of Common Market Studies47: 127–151.
43.
ShepsleKAWeingastBR (1987)
The institutional foundations of committee power.American Political Science Review81: 85–104.
44.
TsebelisG (1994)
The power of the European Parliament as a conditional agenda setter.American Political Science Review88: 128–142.
45.
WeingastBRMarshallWJ (1988)
The industrial organization of Congress; or, why legislatures, like firms, are not organized as markets.Journal of Political Economy96: 132–163.
46.
WhitakerR (2005)
National parties in the European Parliament: an influence in the committee system?European Union Politics6: 5–28.
47.
YordanovaN (2009)
The rationale behind Committee Assignment in the European Parliament distributive, informational and Partisan perspectives.European Union Politics10: 253–280.
48.
YordanovaN (2011)
Inter-institutional rules and division of power in the European Parliament: allocation of consultation and co-decision reports.West European Politics34: 97–121.
49.
YordanovaN (2013) Organising the European Parliament: The Role of the Committees and their Legislative Influence.
Colchester:
ECPR Press.
50.
YoshinakaAMcElroyGBowlerS (2010)
The appointment of rapporteurs in the European Parliament.Legislative Studies Quarterly35: 457–486.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
