Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

What impact do leaders in the European Parliament’s (EP) committees have on the EP’s opinions? This study formulates and tests expectations about the conditions under which rapporteurs influence the EP’s opinions and also about what factors motivate that influence. In line with the informational theory of legislative committees, the most important factor affecting the EP’s opinion is the policy position of the median MEP, not a characteristic of the rapporteur. Nonetheless, the evidence shows that rapporteurs influence the EP’s opinions when legislative proposals are subject to early agreements under the co-decision procedure and when the consultation procedure applies. Rapporteurs’ influence is motivated primarily by national interests, rather than by the interests of their EP party groups.

Keywords

co-decision committees European Parliament rapporteurs

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Benedetto G. ( 2005) Rapporteurs as legislative entrepreneurs: The dynamics of the co-decision procedure in Europe’s parliament. Journal of European Public Policy 12(1): 67-88.

Bueno de Mesquita B. ( 2003) Principles of International Politics: People’s Power, Preferences and Perceptions, 2nd edn. Washington, DC: CQ Press.

Bueno de Mesquita B , Stokman FN (eds) (1994) European Community Decision-making: Models, Applications and Comparisons. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Corbett R. , Jacobs F. , and Shackleton M. ( 2003) The European Parliament, 5th edn. London: John Harper Publishing .

Farrell H. , Héritier A. ( 2004) Interorganizational negotiation and intraorganizational power in shared decision making. Comparative Political Studies 37(10): 1184-1212.

Gilligan TW , Krehbiel K. ( 1989) Asymmetric information and legislative rules with a heterogeneous committee. American Journal of Political Science 33(2): 459-490.

Gilligan TW , Krehbiel K. ( 1990) Organization of informative committees by a rational legislature . American Journal of Political Science 34(2): 531-564.

Hausemer P. ( 2006) Participation and political competition in committee report allocation: Under what conditions do MEPs represent their constituents ? European Union Politics 7(4): 505-530.

Hix S. ( 2005) The Political System of the European Union, 2nd edn. London: Palgrave .

10.

Hix S. , Noury AG , and Roland G. ( 2007) Democratic Politics in the European Parliament . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

11.

Hoyland B. ( 2006) Allocation of co-decision reports in the fifth European Parliament. European Union Politics 7(1): 30-50.

12.

Kaeding M. ( 2004) Rapporteurship allocation in the European Parliament. European Union Politics 5(3): 353-371.

13.

Kardasheva R. (2009) The power to delay: The European Parliament’s influence in the consultation procedure. Journal of Common Market Studies 47(2): 385-409.

14.

King G. , Tomz M. , and Wittenberg J. ( 2000) Making the most of statistical analyses: Improving interpretation and presentation. American Journal of Political Science 44(2): 341-355.

15.

König T. , Lindburg B. , Lechner S. , and Pohlmeier W. ( 2007) Bicameral conflict resolution in the European Union: An empirical analysis of conciliation committee bargains. British Journal of Political Science 37(2): 281-312.

16.

Krehbiel K. ( 1991) Are congressional committees composed of preference outliers ? American Political Science Review 84(1): 149-163.

17.

Kreppel A. ( 2002) The European Parliament and Supranational Party System: A Study in Institutional Development. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.

18.

McDonald MD , Budge I. ( 2005) Elections, Parties, Democracy: Conferring the Median Mandate . Oxford: Oxford University Press .

19.

McElroy G. ( 2006) Committee representation in the European Parliament. European Union Politics 7(1): 5-29.

20.

Mamadouh V. , Raunio T. ( 2003) The committee system: Powers, appointments and report allocation. Journal of Common Market Studies 41(2): 333-351.

21.

Noury AG ( 2002) Ideology, nationality and Euro-Parliamentarians . European Union Politics 3(1): 81-111.

22.

Rasmussen A. ( 2008) Time choices in bicameral bargaining: Evidence from the co-decision legislative procedure of the European Union. Paper presented at the Fourth Pan-European Conference on EU Politics, 26-27 September, Riga.

23.

Raunio T. ( 2000) Losing independence or finally gaining recognition? Contacts between MEPS and national parties. Party Politics 6(2): 211-223.

24.

Scully RM ( 1997) Policy influence and participation in the European Parliament. Legislative Studies Quarterly 22(2): 233-252.

25.

Settembri P. , Neuhold C. (2009) Achieving consensus through committees: Does the European Parliament manage? Journal of Common Market Studies 47(1): 127-151.

26.

Shackleton M. , Raunio T. ( 2003) Co-decision since Amsterdam: A laboratory for institutional innovation and change. Journal of European Public Policy 10(2): 171-187.

27.

Thomson R. ( 2006) Comparison of expert judgements with each other and with information from council documentation. In: Thomson R , Stokman FN , Achen CH , and König T (eds) The European Union Decides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 329-347.

28.

Thomson R. , Hosli M. ( 2006) Who has power in the EU? Journal of Common Market Studies 44(2): 391-417.

29.

Thomson R. , Stokman FN ( 2006) Research design: Measuring actors’ positions, saliences and capabilities. In: Thomson R , Stokman FN , Achen CH , and König T (eds) The European Union Decides. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 25-53.

30.

Whitaker R. ( 2005) National parties in the European Parliament: An influence in the committee system? European Union Politics 6(1): 5-28.

31.

White H. ( 1980) A heteroscedasticity consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test of heteroscedasticity. Econometrica 48(4): 817-818.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.01 MB

0.03 MB

0.00 MB

0.05 MB